By on September 28, 2007

beijingbus03bqt.jpgUp until now, The People's Republic of China taxed vehicles based on weight and through tolls. (You didn't think Chinese motorists were tax-free did you?) Now they're eliminating tolls and other road taxes in favor of a fuel tax. Apparently this radical idea will mean that people who drive more will pay more and those who drive less will pay less. The China Car Times isn't over the moon about the cutting edge concept. While they repeat Beijing's claim that the new system will push car companies into developing "other alternative fuel cars," they also believe "the driver gets pinched in the pocket and has to take public transport… Clearly the Mandarins in Beijing have not taken public transport in China in the last decade and the last place I'd like to be on a Monday morning is on a packed diesel fume spewing bus with my nose pushed firmly in someones arm pit." The tax takes effect next March.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

4 Comments on “China to Tax Fuel...”


  • avatar
    fallout11

    Once again, the Chinese show why their civilization has existed, intact, for 5000 years. Imagine, a taxation system that actually encouraged the use of public transportation and discouraged private, single-passenger commuting……

  • avatar
    beken

    ” this has sent a collective shock down the backs of 1.3 billion people who really dont want to pay tax.” This sounds almost democratic.

    Have you ever ridden the a transit bus in China? The transit buses we have here in N. America feel almost like Limos in comparison. I don’t know where you got that picture, but the last time I visited China and rode a transit bus (in Guanzhou), I had to be pushed in by a “bus stuffer” and was quite amazed the bus didn’t tip over whenever it pulled in and out of a bus stop.

    Maybe the tax will also fund better transit.

  • avatar
    RobertSD

    I dare U.S. politicians to get off their inefficient CAFE high and start talking about a gas tax. It would be much more economically efficient and would get people into smaller cars by changing demand and not supply (always the wrong thing to change in the equation).

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber