By on October 22, 2007

a123_in_prius.jpg"'People who took interest in electric vehicles are showing interest in plug-in' vehicles, Mr. Asakura said, through a translator. 'But my wife does not accept charging [the vehicle] every day.'" Speaking to The Wall Street Journal in Tokyo, Toyota's hybrid vehicle system-engineering division's project manager poured a torrent of cold water on GM's belief that their plug-in hybrid Hail Mary Volt will be practical, affordable, desirable, reliable or doable. Other than that… Toyota says its exploring plug-in possibilities using its existing nickel-metal hydride battery-powered Prius. An undisclosed number of Prii are headed for two undisclosed California universities for testing. Oh, and Toyota will also look at lithium-ion technology for their Synergy Drive system, in accordance with an undisclosed timetable. In any event (or lack thereof), Toyota's NOT down with GM's plan to build a car that motors around on battery power alone, then switches to internal combustion. If Toyota develops plug-in hybrids, they plan on powering the car on electricity for short bursts, alternating with power from the gasoline engine. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “Toyota Hybrid Boss’ Wife Nixes Plug-in Hybrids...”


  • avatar
    radimus

    People might get down on Mrs. Asakura for this, but legions of apartment dwellers and people who must park their cars on the street will likely agree with her. Plug-in hybrids do them little good.

  • avatar
    shaker

    radimus is correct; the “plug-in” feature maybe should be an option, as many can’t utilize it.

  • avatar
    jkross22

    Consumer demand will drive this. The Pious proved there are enough people willing to plunk down the dollars to wear the Eco-badge. Who am I (or Mrs. Asakura) to poo-poo someone’s desire to stick it to the Saudis, our eternal friends?

  • avatar
    foobar

    Has Toyota ever presented a sensible argument against making plug-in charging (plus a bigger battery pack) an added-cost option on the Prius? Their refusal to do it just seems mulishly stubborn at this point. Whether the “fat spot” in the market is $10K extra for the option, $3K, or $1K, there are at least some customers who’d buy in at any of those price points, no significant downside for Toyota that I can see, and it’s a major green-marketing brownie point whether there’s much added profit in it or not.

  • avatar
    whatdoiknow1

    People might get down on Mrs. Asakura for this, but legions of apartment dwellers and people who must park their cars on the street will likely agree with her. Plug-in hybrids do them little good.

    Nevermind just the Hybrids, GM have never understood Car/Urban culture. That is just one of the reason they have a very hard time selling vehicles to over 50% of the population in their home market.

  • avatar
    SunnyvaleCA

    Plugging in the vehicle might be impossible for apartment dwellers, but that doesn’t really matter. The vehicle doesn’t have to be a viable option for 100% of consumers. As for “fast charging”: the vehicles can be recharged in as little as 30 seconds! That’s 15 seconds to plug in at night and 15 seconds to unplug in the morning–much faster than a gas station refill. :-)

  • avatar
    f8

    Plug-ins would be a niche market anyhow. If there’s a viable way to work plug-ins into current society, it would be by offering traditional hybrids with plug-in capabilities, not a standalone plug-in

  • avatar
    Steven Lang

    You can easily make the point that hybrid technology is already marketed towards a niche. However, I see absolutely no validation whatsoever that plug-in hybrids would be unpopular in today’s marketplace. In fact it would seem quite the opposite would be true.

    Consider the following…

    We already use vehicles for numerous short trips during the weekends. A plug-in would fit quite nicely with that commuting pattern.

    There are also plenty of folks who travel 20 miles or less to their workplace. Again, a plug-in hybrid would offer minimal cost in that situation.

    Finally, there is THAT issue of politics. A lot of by-products of oil dependency are starting to take a toll on humanity. War, environmental damage, pseudo-religious nutjobs, and the neverending saber rattling that jacks up oil prices and squeezes the common man’s finances are all in play. Personally, I’d rather be supporting Germany at this time of year than the Sultans, Sheiks, Mullahs, and multi-national conglomerates who seem to be the primary beneficiaries of our current oil dependency.

    If GM is willing to put their resources to the upcoming plug-in Volt, I say they should be commended for it. We little people need all the help we can get. I’ve also got the feeling that by 2009 we’ll have to reconsider our energy policy and start altering our transportation infrastructure in as dramatic a fashion as was done in the 1950’s and 1960’s.

    With billions of people clamoring for a little automotive freedom of their own energy alternatives seem to be a necessity and a certainty.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber