By on November 5, 2007

pinto.jpgMy first car was a Ford. As was my second. And my third. They were all hand-me-down Ford Pinto station wagons. And I owned all of them in the space of one year. By the time these machines were under my care, they had around 60k teenage miles on the clock. At the risk of flattering my eventual driving skills, the transfer was a bit like giving an aspiring classical pianist Jerry Lee Lewis' old piano. But I loved my Pintos. Not just because they gave me my freedom (a.k.a. a place to smoke dope and exchange bodily fluids), but also because, well, they were cars. The thing of it is, back in the day, everyone knew what a Ford was: a cheap car. You didn't buy a Ford because you wanted to. You bought it because you had to. Don't get me wrong: there was no dishonor in that. There was working class pride involved. As you know, tempus fugited. Now that the Explorer is lost in the wilderness, I reckon the F-150 is the only Ford vehicle that keeps faith with that blue collar ethos. Even a Fusion is too… fancy. I know, I know; there have been plenty of fancy Fords. But not as many as there have been plain old Fords. Can the Blue Oval rekindle a friendship with America's economy-minded car buyers? I don't know. But as far as Ford having a feeling for the common guy's taste in cars, as a former Pinto owner, I've got one thing to say: there's another myth exploded. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

7 Comments on “Daily Podcast: Maybe Next Time...”


  • avatar
    86er

    Now that the Explorer is lost in the wilderness, I reckon the F-150 is the only Ford vehicle that keeps faith with that blue collar ethos. Even a Fusion is too… fancy. I know, I know; there have been plenty of fancy Fords. But not as many as there have been plain old Fords. Can the Blue Oval rekindle a friendship with America's economy-minded car buyers? I think the Crown Vic/LTD used to keep the faith with blue-collar people too. My father was as blue-collar as they come, a labourer at a Case IH dealership, and owned a Marquis back in the 80s. Many people think these were "luxury" cars, but they really weren't. They were just a basic, no-nonsense car that you could work on yourself. Besides, you used to be able to get these cars fairly basic, with hubcaps and cloth seats, but still endowed with all the popular options of the time. They weren't ridiculously expensive back then either. ($44 K CDN for a Marquis! Come on!)

  • avatar
    86er

    I know, I know; there have been plenty of fancy Fords. But not as many as there have been plain old Fords.

    Plenty indeed. Custom 500s, basic straight-six Fairlanes and Falcons were ubiquitous at one time. Ford just made a basic car that resonated better, arguably, than the Biscaynes and unconventional Corvairs.

    Mind you, back then if you wanted a stripper car with a hot V-8, just check a box. Nowadays, where’s my $25 K CDN Crown Vic or my $25 K CDN Impala with a V8?

  • avatar
    taxman100

    Since the Crown Vic went bye-bye (not really, you can still buy them for 2008 if you know the fleet manager, but that is another story), you can get a base Grand Marquis for around $19,000.

    Other than that, Ford is trying mightily to be a brand for women and rather prissy men, but most brands have been so watered down, most of the market is amorphously undistinguishable.

    My father bought nothing but Fords for 50 years (I learned to drive in a 76 Maverick with nothing but an automatic and AM radio), but I find the modern Ford Motor Company to be completely aggrevating in just about everything they do.

  • avatar
    Vance Blankenbaker

    Can the Blue Oval rekindle a friendship with America's economy-minded car buyers?em> Cars have become so reliable that it makes more economic sense for many working-class folks to buy more car for less– "pre-owned." Why buy a new, base-model sardine-can when you can spend the same money on a more comfortable, luxurious model several years old? For many blue collar consumers, the new car market is either out-of-reach or a value compromise that's ultimately not worth it.

  • avatar
    draggin

    Love your quote about us all knowing what a ford was, cheap transportation.

    As my buddy Todd says ” The only reason to BUY a FORD is because it is all you CAN A-Ford!

    Did i mention my 2004 Thunderbird is a 40K POS?
    yea, i did…..

  • avatar
    benders

    I wish I would’ve read this before posting under the Deathwatch but I’ll say it again.

    In the parking lot of the USW plant where I work, there are maybe 10 Ford cars (not including trucks) in a sea of a few hundred of the General’s cheapest.

    That being said, Ford, Mazda, and Subaru make the only cars I want to buy. Scratch that, cars I want that I can afford.

  • avatar
    fallout11

    The Ranger still keeps that faith, for a bit longer yet. See lots of well-worn and still rolling ones with scratched up beds and/or small business logos on the side (often trades).

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber