When does art become a public menace? According to Toronto police, when it's driven on city streets. Canada.com reports Dean Baldwin was pulled over whilst "driving" artist Michel de Broin's Shared Propulsion Car (SPC). The vehicle in question is a 1986 Buick Regal that's been stripped of engine, transmission and suspension (it uses votive candles to meet the Canadian requirement for daytime running lights). In case you're wondering, the pedal-powered Buick is part of a solo exhibition at the Mercer Union art gallery. No matter. Baldwin has been charged with driving an unsafe vehicle. It isn't the first time the art car has caught the attention of the po-po. In Montreal, the art car went all of two blocks before it was pulled over. However, it went unchallenged (and probably unnoticed) when it appeared in New York City. When Baldwin's case comes up, de Broin said he plans to have the car towed to court. After winning the case, he'll "drive it away 'slowly' and 'freely'."
[You can see the Shared Propulsion Car in action on YouTube]
Yabba-dabba-do?
Too cool. Funny that in nyc no cops bothered them as they pedaled around for 3 hours.
I wonder how they’ll try to argue it’s unsafe. As far as I can tell, no specific regulations apply to this other than the requirement to display a slow-moving vehicle sign. (It has too many wheels to count as a bicycle in Ontario law.)
Probably nobody noticed it because in New York City because it did not go any slower than traffic…. which potentially speaks volumes about the speed of New York traffic, doesn’t it?
(Of course, I’m using “speed” in as a euphamism for “something other than standing still”). As in, a Snail is “speedier” than a dead rabbit.
I’m still baffled as to why they chose a Buick regal. Perhaps for structural integrity? (anyone…anyone?)
OK, it is really stupid, but why is it “ART”?
The cop was a pr;&k. I have no idea why the thing should be deemed unsafe. It is no doubt annoying, but it is not a motor vehicle and is probably as safe as anything on the street including baby prams.
I’m still baffled as to why they chose a Buick regal. Perhaps for structural integrity? (anyone…anyone?)
Because a lighter car would take the challenge out of the project? Besides, when restored, these are sharp looking cars.
Well, I’ve got a Buick Regal, but I got it for the V6 3.8, not for pedaling. I’ve had three cars with the 3.8 and it has always run like a champ. I think they’ve phased it out, though.
Here’s something that would have been a lot easier to pedal – a Fiat 500 made into an EV. The first photo is the best because the model is so tall she makes the 500 look like a toy:
http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/3275?nocomments
http://www.eurozev.org/English.htm
well that beats the town. Put a big smile on my face. Looking at the profile, with the feet on the ground, shades of the Flintstones. The reaction of the policeman… some people get rigid as they age. They don’t know how to deal with that which fails to conform to the norm.
As for why a Buick Regal? Why not? Although I might have chosen a K-car for this, uh, exercise. Or maybe an old Rambler American.
This “Shared Propulsion Car” isn’t really a new idea. Yugo produced thousands of examples years ago. The main difference is de Broin included pedals.