By on January 16, 2008

mao-citroen.jpgAmerica ad agencies aren't the only auto industry suppliers suffering from foot-in-mouth disease. Reuters reports that a Spanish Citroen ad has triggered quite a furor in China. The poster shows Chairman Mao looking down at a Citroen hatchback. The copy proclaims, "It's true, we are leaders, but at Citroen the revolution never stops. We are once more going to put in motion all the machinery of our technological ability, in order to repeat in 2008 the successes obtained in previous years." The picture of Mao is similar to one in Tianamen Square, with the the People's Republic founder's mouth distorted and squinting eyes. Once the ad hit the internet, the shit hit the fan. Chinese web slingers felt the ad was "not only insulting [to] Chairman Mao, but the whole Chinese nation… where Mao is greatly revered." Citroen immediately pulled the ad and issued an apology. What effect the faux pas will have on Citroen's Chinese sales remains to be seen.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

17 Comments on “Citroen’s Mao Mix Infuriates the Chinese...”


  • avatar
    BlisterInTheSun

    Mao is revered?

    This psychopath was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of innocent Chinese – and that’s in PEACETIME!!

    Thumbs-down to Citroen for even considering a picture of history’s greatest murderer. Maybe they should try and market to their own population using a cartoon where Klaus Barbie demonstrates how many Jews you can stuff into the back of their latest hatchback.

  • avatar
    quasimondo

    On a side note, I think that’s the first non-ugly Citroen I’ve ever seen.

  • avatar
    Nemphre

    Yeah, it looks like a CRX. If it wasn’t a Citroen I’d be interested.

  • avatar

    I’m surprised Citroen didn’t run a series of the ads including Stalin and Sihanouk to make sure that Citroen got noticed in Russia and Cambodia as well.
    Seriously, Citroen should know better.

  • avatar
    CarnotCycle

    Seeing this, I can only imagine the Hitler-Volkswagen or Tojo-Mitsubishi possibilities for ads in truly poor taste.

  • avatar
    NeonCat93

    Mao is cuddly like Che is. Since we never fought a popular war against him (Korea doesn’t count, too indirect) it’s easy to overlook his being a mass-murderer. Besides, as far as the people of China (who have been subjected to his personality cult since at least 1949) are concerned, he kicked the Japanese out, united the country and dragged it into the 20th century: to make an omelet, you have to break a few eggs.

    As for his use in the ad, Mao has a much better recognition factor than Tojo or Sihanouk, probably better than Stalin.

  • avatar
    allythom

    Mitsubishi did have the Lancer Evolution VI Zero Fighter special edition.

  • avatar
    Virtual Insanity

    Does CarnotCycle’s post constitute Godwin’s Law?

  • avatar
    CarnotCycle

    Virtual Insanity,

    I don’t my reference does. Given the Mao + Car connection if you think about it with Hitler and Volkswagen seems like a natural train of thought, especially in the context of the history of automobiles, in this instance than a devolution of some kind in the discussion itself.

  • avatar
    jazbo123

    Rule #1 as you embrace a market economy – Get used to annoying ads, and for God’s Mao’s sake get a sense of humor.

  • avatar
    Wulv

    Wow, a huge uproar? From the country that filters the net so brutally? Who are the people that actually see the ad? The only people allowed to see the ad probably work for the Chinese government.

  • avatar
    BlisterInTheSun

    The only people allowed to see the ad probably work for the Chinese government.

    Good point

  • avatar
    starlightmica

    Ah, extreme political incorrectness in advertising. Going in the other direction:

    1) A few years ago, the Taiwanese Kuomintang party used Hitler in a campaign ad, comparing him to the then-president and member of the other party.

    2) Even further back, another Taiwanese ad promoting German made space heaters featured a cartoon Hitler declaring war on the “Cold Front”.

    Needless to say, both were pulled quickly after public outcry.

  • avatar

    i liked the economist‘s piece on the great chairman …

  • avatar
    Lumbergh21

    1) A few years ago, the Taiwanese Kuomintang party used Hitler in a campaign ad, comparing him to the then-president and member of the other party.

    You’d never see that sort of politics in the good old US of A, though. ;-)

  • avatar
    BlisterInTheSun

    RE: bloodnok

    Great article – I read Chang & Halliday’s book last summer. Great quote from the Economist piece:

    “Perhaps for the struggling executive, this is the single most important lesson: if you can’t do anything right, do a lot. The more you have going on, the longer it will take for its disastrous consequences to become clear.”

    There’s a great explanation for MB’s strategic planning over at GM.

  • avatar
    marknyn

    The difference between Mao and Hitler was one of intent. Most of the deaths attributed to Mao were a result of bad policy decisions and perhaps pig-headedness- there was no intent to cause massive suffering , whereas for Hitler extermination was the name of the game.
    When Mao took over the average life expectancy was 35. In 1978, two years after he died it was 68 (partly due to a barefoot doctor system initiated by him) – so he probably SAVED many more lives than the deaths he was supposedly responsible for. The positives and negatives of Mao’s rule is something for the Chinese people to decide about. Knowing many Chinese people both in China and overseas, it is quite obvious that Mao is still widely revered – especially in the poorer rural areas. And it is definitely something that the current leadership does not encourage, as to many Maoists the China of today has completely abandoned what is to them pure socialism. In fact pro-Mao demonstrators have been jailed quite recently. http://www.monthlyreview.org/0105commentary.htm

    Regardless of the rights and wrongs of it, a signficant proportion, probably a good majority of Chinese still revere Mao. Citroen made a MARKETING blunder to start off with. That they have apologized has nothing to do with truckling to the Chinese communists – it just makes sense if you want to include Chinese among your customers.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber