By on February 13, 2008

131_0604_05_z1966_1977_ford_broncopiston.jpgFile this one under "no good deed goes unpunished." Boston.com reports that Ford donated four piston assembly patents to The National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization (NISTAC), took a $27m tax deduction, licensed the technology back from NISTAC, terminated the agreement, and then continued using the patents paying nobody nothing. One potential issue: does NISTAC own the patents? It claims it's the "replacement" organization for Mid-American Commercial Corp, which received the original dontation. As you might imagine, all this philanthropy went down before Ford hocked its future to stay in business. Ford made the piston patent donation back in 2000– and 44 more besides, on seven separate occasions, to institutions including the University of Michigan and the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “Ford Sued Over Donated Patents...”


  • avatar
    franz

    I would have thought that the legal office would be the last non-core business Ford would divest. Who made this flaming agreement to donate the patent and not have some kind of allowance for the donor to use the technology for free – perpetually? I mean, come on…would the tax break have been that much less?

  • avatar
    Bytor

    Good deed? It sounds more like Ford pocketed $27M, from “giving it away” (read sold) and decided to not pay to keep using what was no longer theirs.

  • avatar
    jfsvo

    bytor, how does “a $27m tax deduction” equate to Ford pocketing $27M?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_deduction

  • avatar
    Blunozer

    Ahhh… U.S. Patent Law.

    A lovely morass of lawyers, beaurocrats, and soul-sucking technobabble.

    I’m sure this will clear up in no time.

  • avatar

    Can anyone now use those patents royalty free or only Ford?

  • avatar
    franz

    Sherman,

    My understanding, from reading the article, is that nobody – not even Ford – may use this patent royalty-free.

    That’s what seems so strange. Ford came up with this idea, patented it, then gave the patent away (OK, Ford gets a tax deduction in exchange for the gift). Ford is no longer permitted to implement the idea unless it continually pays a fee to the current patent-holder.

    I can’t understand why Ford didn’t give the patent away in exchange for royalty-free use. Ford could have given further gifts to the Institute (for more tax deductions) instead of royalties, and retained free use of the idea THAT THEY THEMSELVES invested in to develop and realize.

  • avatar

    So, nobody’s gonna say it?

    Indian Giver!!!*

    *no offense intended towards Native Americans or actual Indians.

  • avatar
    andy777

    I’d love to be the fly on the wall as the IRS decides to look at the $27 million price tag Ford put on those patents.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber