By on February 20, 2008

dsc00153.jpgLil' Abner once featured a car that ran on smog. Unfortunately it needed fossil fuel cars to provide enough smog for fuel. The New York Times reports F. Jeffrey Martin and William L. Kubic Jr. are proposing Green Freedom, a scheme, err, concept, to remove carbon dioxide from the air and turn it back into methanol, gasoline or jet fuel. "Everything in the concept has been built, is operating or has a close cousin that is operating," claims Dr. Martin. But (there's always a but) the process requires a great deal of energy. Producing 750,000 gallons of smog-based gasoline a day would require a a $5 billion conversion plant. Oh, and a dedicated nuclear power plant. The process would only be profitable when refined gasoline hits $4.60 a gallon (been to Europe lately?). Venture capitalists will be lining up for this one.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

4 Comments on “Thar’s Gold in Them Thar Greenhouse Gases...”


  • avatar
    guyincognito

    Finally! Now we can suck all of that toxic C02 from the environment and save the world!

  • avatar
    NICKNICK

    yeah, cause we totally don’t want any CO2 out there.

    i’ve been wondering how i could suffocate all those trees.

  • avatar
    Lumbergh21

    As P.T. Barnum reportedly said, there’s one born every minute.

  • avatar
    SunnyvaleCA

    “profitable when refined gasoline hits $4.60 a gallon (been to Europe lately?)”

    Ah, but Europe gasoline prices are mostly just taxes. Use the rule (here for the USA) that $1/barrel oil increase means 2.5 cents gallon of gasoline increase. If we are currently about $3 nationally then we would need $1.60 increase, which means $1.60 / 0.025 = $64 barrel increase. That would put oil at about $160/barrel.

    Of course the whole thing is silly. If you are going to build a new nuclear plant, you could instead tear down a coal-burning electricity plant. That would have way more effect on carbon dioxide.

    Still, nice to see people are working at many different angles with respect to the dual threats of global warming and fossil fuel depletion.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber