Speaking at the Morgan Stanley Global Automotive Conference in New York, Ford CEO Alan Mulally confident predicted that Ford's global rationalization (i.e. same vehicles, different wrappers) will allow the embattled automaker to make money on its small cars in the American market (providing they sell enough of them). The AP [via The Houston Chronicle] reports that Big Al told the assembled throngs he'd been surprised (surprised I tell you) by the complexity of Ford's assembly process. "For instance, the Lincoln Navigator large sport utility vehicle had 128 possible console combinations," roughly one per customer [kidding, I think]. Since taking the reins, Ford has reduced complexity by "up to 80 percent" on "some" models. "You can imagine what that means to the cost structure worldwide," he told the analysts, who tend to prefer hard numbers to vague assurances. Still, Mulally confidently predicted– well "hopes"– his employer will equip 500k vehicles per year with EcoBoost engines by 2013. "It's absolutely going to be a competitive advantage," Mulally asserted. Meanwhile, FoMoCo's CEO conceded that "Ford's market share in trucks and sport utility vehicles has slipped recently, which he attributed to competition." So now you tell us.
Find Reviews by Make:
Read all comments
It sounds like a refreshingly open and candid discussion. Seems like he has a handle on the actions being taken.
Oh, by the way they sold 24,000 Navigators in 2007. That on top of the 90.000 Expeditions is a lot of cash flow. But with higher gas prices 2008 will be a lot lower.
the Lincoln Navigator large sport utility vehicle had 128 possible console combinations,” roughly one per customer [kidding, I think]
I love this site!
John
The new Fiesta will be assembled in Mexico. Between the low-cost assembly site, and global rationalization of this platform, it is entirely plausible that Ford will make money on this car.
My dad worked at the Mercury plant in the late 1950’s and the plant manager essentially had the boys pull out parts and put them on the floor, then called the engineering boys from HQ to come on over.
There were something like 128 variations on exhaust systems, which was driving the workmen in the plant absolutely nutzoid (and driving quality through the sub-basement because of errors). He read them the riot act – nearly the impossible deal since they clearly outranked him.
The guys in the plant were all smiles as the boffins in engineering pared down the variations to something like 16.
Some things never change.
During a very recent job interview I asked how many variations there are for the F150 instrument panel – between colors, entertainment systems, SAT/NAV, climate control systems, trim levels, etc. The production manager responded “Ummm – millions. No one knows for sure.”
Gas didnt just go up last week. How much profit was generated by the 24,000 navs and 90,000 expeditions? I am willing to bet they were sold with very little profit. I looked at a full size pickup last april and they offered $5,000 off the sticker of $29,500 before I even asked the out the door price! No, I didnt buy the silverado, I kept my 4 cylinder colorado.
“..500,000 units by 2013..” Who here thinks Ford will be in business in 2013?
“…how many variations there are for the F150 instrument panel – between colors, entertainment systems, … The production manager responded “Ummm – millions. No one knows for sure.”
Reminds me of when I started my first job in the industry at a Honda dealer in the 1970’s. If you wanted to buy a (then-remarkable) first generation Honda Accord, you answered only 3 questions:
— stick or automatic?
— with or without air conditioning?
— what color would you like?
You could spend an hour filling out the option sheet for the Oldsmobiles sold in the same dealership.
With Mulally leading the way? I’m pretty confident they will still be around in 2013 and with a much better line-up than most of their competitors.
Making money on small cars is not some distant wish either. The Focus is a great example of how quickly things are changing at Ford. Right now, discounts on 2008 Focus to retail customers are about 1/3-1/2 less across the nation than last year and overall net pricing is up (they didn’t specify). Its rental sales are down probably 60% this year (a guess based on information from monthly sales calls). Its corporate numbers are flat-ish. Retail was up 35% through February. To top it off, the cost of producing a Focus has been reduced by sourcing some parts from countries other than Canada and the U.S. The Focus used to be a $3-4k drain per vehicle sold. It’s probably down to less than half that.
Still a loss-maker, but imagine if it were produced in Mexico. Or, imagine if it were the C1 Focus. That would respectively lower cost or raise net pricing and help the bottom line. But more importantly, this is the kind of thing that Ford is working on – that they had to address. Whether you like the new Focus or not, it will likely create a $200-300 million change in net profits this year without any buyouts, layoffs, new work rules, overhead reductions, moving the assembly to Mexico, etc. etc. And that’s how you run a business. And it’s good to see that Ford finally gets it.
It isn’t engineering’s job to control complexity across vehicle systems. Engineers optimize their system for the requirements it must meet. The change control board and project management should be managing vehicle complexity and part sharing across platforms and marketing shouldn’t be allowed to introduce needless option packages. If Mullaly is getting control of that process, which has been decidedly out of control, it would be great for Ford. Still I don’t think Ford can make a profit in North America on small cars.
All the domestics have been option happy for quite some time. Honda takes it to the other extreme, you can get 3-4 versions of each model (not counting the Si or Hybrid) with different levels of bells & whistles.
Same conversation on the modern version of the Accord (now the “Civic” since the Fit is the Civic and the Accord has bloated to Buick barge proportions) is: Stripped, Ok, Nice and Loaded.
Ford had a good competitive offering with the Focus that they allowed to get stale.