By on April 18, 2008

service_image.jpgWhen I lived in the UK, any and all deliveries of big ticket items were [not] made in "six to eight weeks." In the carmaker spin game, almost everything that isn't happening now is due in 2010. Until, of course, 2010. When it'll be 2011 or 2012. Anyway, according to Chrysler's executive vice president of North American sales, the automaker will unveil its first standalone service center on that fabled date. Lest the company reveal any pertinent info or commit to a particular plan, Steven Landry followed his boss' lead in revealing what the Brits call sweet FA. "Chrysler is in discussion with 'under 10' retailers about the strategy, he says. Landry would not detail which markets or dealerships are involved in the talks… 'In some cases where one dealer is buying another one in a situation where there are not enough service stalls the buying dealership will be able to use the other dealership service stalls as a stand-alone service center,' Landry says. 'You need to have the right number of stalls.' Props to Autoblog's Michael Harley for using this quote to finish with the appropriate bathroom humor. "Funny, any woman at a professional sporting event could have told you that." Ba-doom-boom. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

7 Comments on “Chrysler Standalone Service Centers by 2010. Maybe....”


  • avatar
    Matthew Danda

    I would easily put up with a sub-standard car if I could trust the manufacturers service department. Even the local Toyota dealers haven’t won my trust. So if Chrysler can implement a strategy to radically improve service, then by golly they might actually sell some cars.

  • avatar
    jthorner

    ‘You need to have the right number of stalls.’

    And if the products are Chryslers you need a lot of them! Remote service only locations have been tried from time to time by dealers, but they are a bad idea for two reasons:

    1) Efficiency. Now you need two parts inventories, two sets of rarely used equipment and special tools, two sets of managers and so on. You also tie up extra real estate and end up keeping one or two vehicles and drivers on the road every day shuttling back and forth between the locations.

    2) Lack of sales opportunities. You want the customers who are in for service and repairs to be exposed to the opportunity to buy something newer. When my dad was a car salesman years ago he very often would sell cars to service customers who were waiting to pick up their car and/or just discovered that the cost of fixing the old one were more than they wanted to spend on it.

  • avatar
    windswords

    This idea is beign considered since many of the dealers are going to consolidate into Chryler/Jeep/Dodge dealers (project Genesis). But that will mean less service outlets for the customers. And the convenient location of the dealer to do warranty and other repairs is important to many.

    The answer to not having the chance to go in for service but come out with a new car is simple. Have a very small showroom with a few select models and info for the customers. Provide them with all the contact info they need to whatever the closest dealer is. With WiFi access many customers could set up an appointment for a test drive or even negotiate the price and place an order while they wait.

  • avatar
    seabrjim

    Does this include warranty work? Cause we all know chrysler loves to deny warranty coverage for a plethora of reasons. Would kinda make the shops pointless.

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    I would think the best thing about these shops would be to make dealerships less attractive to keep open. If you are trying your best to get those guys to close their doors, taking away the service dollars could really speed up the process.

  • avatar
    jthorner

    It seems to me that the problem of oversaturated dealerships means that dealer A and dealer B are in relatively close proximity and that combining the operations, perhaps in a new facility located midway between the old A & B makes sense. Chysler argued that the problem was “enough bays” and didn’t make a convenience argument. If you really want to improve customer convenience, improve the (&*)&*)(& product to reduce the need for repairs!

    The micro-showroom idea is a non-starter because you need selection and a good PROFESSIONAL sales staff to really make it work. Which brings up another point, the generally low quality of salespeople. Why the industry spends so much money on advertising to get potential customers in the door and then unleashes a herd of largely rotten salespeople on them has long mystified me.

  • avatar
    davey49

    Honda makes some of the best product in the industry AND they have some of the busiest service businesses you’ll ever see. The professional looking and acting personnel make people want to bring their cars in for service there.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber