By on May 13, 2008

ford_model_t_henry_1w.jpgHow else are we supposed to spin this? The Detroit News reports that Ford engineering veep Paul Mascarenas has announced an "international campaign (?) with five universities to develop a car that is simple, lightweight, practical and priced below $7,000." Something like, I dunno, the Tata Nano? Of for God's sake, you say, stop picking on these guys. The Model T redux is part of that national transportation week weak deal, and a laudable effort to encourage and reward young engineering talent. What's this then? Mascarenas says the program, which will award an $25k to the winning university, is more than an academic exercise. "The Model T has assured its place in history; perhaps 100 years from now, someone will be standing here honoring one of these cars." Which cars? The cars they haven't built? Or the cars that Ford won't be building? Or the ones Ford will be building, after all the paperwork's been signed. Meanwhile, GM's global sales veep has a thing or two to say about the whole past – future thing. "GM is venturing into the future with some ambitious plans, a solid determination, as we launch into our second century," John Middlebrook intoned. "We believe strongly about what we will deliver." For what they are to deliver, may the federal bankruptcy court make us truly thankful. Amen. [thanks to MgoBLUE for the link] 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “Ford Can’t Reinvent the Model T; GM Moving Fordward...”


  • avatar
    danms6

    I wouldn’t consider buying the current Focus new if it cost $7k, where do you go from there?

  • avatar
    Scottie

    What are the five schools?

  • avatar
    Busbodger

    Considering the Focus next time… Relative’s car hasn’t been bad.

  • avatar
    TEXN3

    @Scottie: The other universities participating in the competition are: Aachen University in Cologne, Germany; Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, Calif.; Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; and Lawrence Technological University in Southfield.

    It’s in the article.

    The Focus is NOT a bad car at all, and a very viable cheap and solid alternative to the japanese crowd and much better than a Cobalt (sat in a new rental SS, interior was terrible).

    I’d like to see a new version of a Model T, a perfect second city runabout that can be serviced by myself or at the local Ford dealer. And I want to be able to climb logging roads with it too.

  • avatar
    Raskolnikov

    That sub $7000 car can be bought today: its called a 2001 Corolla/Prism.

  • avatar
    menno

    I kind of got a clue that Tata was going to go big-time when I read (a few years ago) that the Tata conglomerate was worth about 500% as much as the entire General Motors Corporation.

    Ford won’t ever do a Model T replacement because you cannot bring back the past. It’s now someone else’s turn to be the basic transportation provider.

    Because a $7000 car is a damn sight more expensive than a $2500 car when your annual wage is maybe $1500. As in, nearly affordable compared to not a chance of a snowball in hell.

  • avatar
    Kevin

    That sub $7000 car can be bought today: its called a 2001 Corolla/Prism.

    There’s an idea. Seven-year-old cars are always cheaper; why don’t they just build a cheap car with 7-year-old parts and materials?

    See that’s the kind of out-of-the-box thinking they need in Detroit!

  • avatar
    50merc

    Kevin asked, “Seven-year-old cars are always cheaper; why don’t they just build a cheap car with 7-year-old parts and materials?”

    Darned if I know why Detroit doesn’t do this. After all, they’ve already demonstrated that building cars with 20-year-old platforms or 30-year-old engines is a winning strategy.

  • avatar
    Raskolnikov

    Kevin

    the point was apparently lost on you. The financially savvy among us should not be interested in purchasing new cars when perfectly good pre-loved (and depreciated) cars are out there.
    Would you seriously consider buying and putting your kids in a car that cost $7K?

    Not me.

  • avatar
    Dangerous Dave

    A $7k car would need a $6k option package to supply all the creature comforts people demand today. Remember the model T was a plain jane car with one objective – point “a to point b” and built in a day when just owning a car was a big step up from a horse and carriage. People have become used to things like a/c, automatic transmissions, power windows and seats, items once reserved for luxury cars. Today they are standard equipment on many econoboxes. I don’t see a market for a “stripper”

  • avatar

    Talked to a Ford Salesman at local Trade show, he told me that Ford of Canada will import the European Focus for sale in Canada within two years, he agrees that its better than the one here now?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber