By on May 23, 2008

striker.jpgAnother Friday, another bombshell from The General. Yes, once again, GM waits until the markets head-off for the Hamptons before revealing some bad news. Last time, out it was Rick Wagoner's $14.4m annual pay packet– which was good news for Mr. Wagoner and his heirs, bad news for management accountability. This time it's GM's SEC filing re: the cost of the American Axle strike. And there it is: $2.82b. Automotive News [sub] breaks it down this way: "GM estimated that it suffered a $1.8 billion impact in the second quarter alone. That's on top of $800 million from lost production during the first quarter and another $215 million in assistance GM offered to American Axle to finance employee buy-downs and buyouts." Two-hundred-and-fifteen? Hey, what's $15m between friends? Anyway, the total damage makes the cost of the United Auto Workers (UAW) strikes at two GM plants seem like a bargain, at just $200m. Yesterday, we totally missed that Standard & Poor's upped GM to a "B" rating, five levels below investment grade. Reuters reported "The outlook on GM remains negative, meaning a rating cut is still possible. The risk of a downgrade would increase if GM's lower-than-expected U.S. light-vehicle sales through 2009 result in pushing the company's liquidity toward 'undesirable levels,.'" And the next day, a Friday, GM reveals the hit. Huh.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

7 Comments on “GM: American Axle Strike Cost $2.82b...”


  • avatar
    NickR

    Honestly, at this point the numbers are so vast they are lost on me. How any company can sustain this is beyond me. That being said, I guess there’s a difference between an accounting loss and a cash flow loss.

  • avatar

    At least we know how the next quarterly earning will be phrased: “Excluding one-time costs…”

  • avatar
    50merc

    NickR said, “How any company can sustain this is beyond me.”

    As any accountant can explain, they lose money on every vehicle; it’s the volume that keeps them in business.

    Another possibility is that GM is following a brilliant strategic plan drawn up by that famous management expert, Madman Muntz. Hey, don’t laugh–Madman actually made money in the car biz.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    Is that because they were not able to add to their inventories of unsold Tahoes and Yukons?

  • avatar
    Skooter

    You mean the strike actually cost GM? Hard to believe. And they said 215 million in assistance instead of rounding the number down? Wow.

  • avatar
    holydonut

    I wonder if they are including a valuation for the higher warranty costs they plan on incurring when the irate workers return to the line to make those axles.

  • avatar
    CarShark

    @Skooter:

    Why downplay the HUGE effect that could have on a company? That’s $2.82 billion less they could spend on new products or new facilities or a good marketing campaign.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber