By on May 16, 2008

7988-1970-dodge-challenger.jpgI'm the first to admit, I'm not the biggest fan of drag racing. Yes, I intellectually understand how powerful, nifty and skilled everyone involved in the sport is. But I'm just not a fan. However — and a big however — I do love the technology that goes into and comes out of drag racing. More power, stronger components and lighter weight. Guess what? Chrysler is about to make all my dreams come true. Motor Authority is describing the Challenger drag racing kit as a throwback to the Hemi Dart and Barracuda packages of decades gone by. Specifically, what do you get? A lighter chassis. This is the big one, as the Challenger SRT-8 weighs more than a 1970 New Yorker. No, really. Internet speculation is claiming the chassis will be 800 pounds less fat. Which is (or isn't) huge. Draggers will also get lots of engine choices (duh), the possibility of a manual transmission, better brakes, seats, cooling, a working hood scoop and a lift off composite hood. The drag racing package is aimed at both pros and amateurs, is currently being vetted by the NHRA (National Hot Rod Association) to sanction the kit for competition use. I can smell the top fuel now. And the pomade.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “Lock Up Your Pink Slips: Dodge Greenlights Drag Race Challenger...”


  • avatar
    lprocter1982

    So why don’t they use the lighter chassis in the production vehicles? I mean, any fuel savings is good, right?

  • avatar
    quasimondo

    Lighter chassis probably won’t be street legal after they’ve removed all of the impact protection, etc.

  • avatar
    GS650G

    It’s probably not missing much impact protection, however sound insulation adds weight. Using carbon fiber or other high tech materials is expensive and difficult to incorporate in a production run, that could make up the bulk of it. We will have to weight (pun intended) and see.

  • avatar
    Alex Rodriguez

    Of course, Allpar has full coverage on this vehicle, Mopar fans have known about it for nearly a year. It is pretty sweet.

    http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/super-stock-challenger.html

  • avatar
    DragDog

    Weight reduction for drag racing invariably involves removing functionality unrelated to the race or replacing cheap/heavy materials with light/expensive ones.

    A first pass at WR usually involves removing the AC system, heating system, stereo, all passenger seats, carpet and headliner, sound deadening material, spare tire and jack, interior bits (console, power plugs, visors, etc), airbags, emissions systems, windshield wipers, miscellaneous accessories (cruise, power locks, etc), and relocating the battery to the trunk. Chassis bracing may be removed but a roll cage is added, which adds rigidity but can be uncomfortable to move around. The next step is dropping power steering and power brakes. Fiberglass body panels reduce weight but shatter on impact so a fender-bender becomes very expensive. Replacing iron engine components with aluminum helps a lot too. None of these things cut very much individually but in aggregate it really adds up.

    However I doubt very many retail customers would tolerate a vehicle missing all those “essential” features. Which is why Chrysler doesn’t do this to every Challenger.

  • avatar
    blowfish

    Racing Sunday, selling Monday.
    It has been imbedded in the culture as much as right to bear arm.
    Starting up the racing divsion wont costs Chryslerbus all that much but stir up the racing and trickle down to the average joe.
    If Chrysler want another go again this is the way.
    The Hemi engines are stronger than a S*it brickhouse.

  • avatar

    Ford has been doing this for awhile as well. You can purchase the super-light, super-road racing Mustang FR500S from them. But it will cost ya.

    There’s a Drag-Pak option coming for street legal, run of the mill Challenger R/T and SRT8s as well that includes 3.92 rear gears. That should make the cars a beast from a dig.

  • avatar

    Odds are the Drag Pack’d Challenger won’t come with an expensive warranty, either. Or $2.99 a gallon gas.

    I would say this version should come in at thousands less than the R/T, but we all know that Chrysler needs $$$ and people will dig deep for one of these.

  • avatar
    Airhen

    Makes me wish I had the garage space, a tow vehicle, a reason, oh, and the extra money to buy one! And how about my own personal track. Yes, that would be cool. :)

  • avatar
    golden2husky

    Sounds like one to buy and stash for Barrett Jackson 2040….

  • avatar
    rudiger

    Sajeev Mehta: “I would say this version should come in at thousands less than the R/T, but we all know that Chrysler needs $$$ and people will dig deep for one of these.”I wouldn’t bet on the price being less than an R/T. Manufacturers have a bad habit of charging exhorbitant sums for anything ‘limited’ or ‘special’, even if they’re actually much cheaper to build. Porsche used to have a lighter ‘Club Sport’ 993 that lacked A/C and a radio, yet was over $10k more than an RPO car.

    With a limited production run (there were only a total of around 100 Hemi-Darts and ‘Cudas built in 1968, and they were expensive, stripped, dragstrip-only cars, too), I would imagine any true Super-Stock Challenger will fall into the same high-price category.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber