By on June 28, 2008

bilde6.jpgHa! So close, yet so far. American Axle CEO Dick Dauch's '07 paycheck– $5.55m salary and a $8.5m bonus– doesn't quite eclipse GM CEO Rick Wagoner's $14.4m compensation. But hey, what's $350k between friends? And, it must be said, that's a lot of money– even if Dauch did break– sorry, "settle" a three-month strike by cutting half of AA's 3,650 member unionized workforce, instituting a two-tier wage system (lowering newbie wages by roughly 50 percent) and "convincing" GM to kick-in $215m to pay for bailouts. As AA's independent compensation committee put it, the bonus "took into account the company's strong financial performance in 2007, the structural transformation achieved under our new labor agreements with the UAW and… Dauch's leadership role in these negotiations." There, that sounds better. Neither the UAW nor American Axle's president (Dauch's son, appointed post-strike) were available for comment. Meanwhile, well done to The Detroit News for not totaling the CEO's compensation for their headline. There's only such much shock and awe Motown can take these days. (P.S. Isn't it amazing how all this big bucks salary stuff comes out during the weekend?)

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

12 Comments on “American Axle CEO Dick Dauch Pockets $14.05m for ’07...”


  • avatar
    Orian

    Well, at least his company made a profit, correct?
    Wagoner can’t claim the same.

  • avatar
    carguy622

    Regardless of whether the company makes a profit or not, I feel that the discrepancy between what a CEO and average worker of a company gets paid is far too great. The wealth in this country is being distributed poorly and we’re losing the middle class. After all, the top 1% of the nation’s citizens have more wealth the the bottom 99%.

  • avatar
    adonasetb

    They’re all going to go belly-up so what’s the big deal? Just shows that both Management and the Union are hell-bent for destruction – they won’t be missed.

  • avatar
    jaje

    He snookered Wagoner into throwing in $215m – that can easily pay all of his salary and then some.

  • avatar
    naif

    do not worry folks, when big business is finished creating havoc with the middle class it will start on the lower class. remember ” trickle down”.

  • avatar
    Justin Berkowitz

    Bonus? He gets a bonus?

    Newsflash: they’re going to go out of business if/when GM goes out of business.

    The arrogance is astonishing.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    It makes me violently ill to see all these executives being paid so well for killing off the US’ manufacturing infrastructure and doing their best to kick working people out of the middle class.

    Of course it is the executives deciding how much they will get paid and they have an army of well dressed consultants to dress it up … just like Enron did.

    The moral fabric of large American businesses has mostly been torn to shreds. “I’ve got mine, up yours” seems to be the watchword.

  • avatar
    quasimondo

    Blame the unions. They always ask for too much!

  • avatar
    guyincognito

    Actually, I think Dauch did a pretty good job this year. Faced with a stubborn union, he stuck to his guns and got the contract the company needed to lower future overhead costs and got some money from GM, and transferred manufacturing to lower cost countries in the process. At the very least you can say he was working aggressively to control costs. What did Rick Wagoner do?

  • avatar
    Lumbergh21

    While not “happy” with how much he made this year, at least Dick’s company made money. Can the same be said for Rick?

  • avatar
    shaker

    Dick’s company could have made $10 million more, if Dick only made 4 million dollars last year.
    Think of the COMPANY, Dick!

    33 years as a working citizen, and I’m still working on my first million — may death not claim me until I’m in the $1 mil club.

  • avatar
    skygreenleopard

    “They’re all going to go belly-up so what’s the big deal? Just shows that both Management and the Union are hell-bent for destruction – they won’t be missed.”

    Yes, but the unions fought to A) not lose their jobs, and B) not lose half of their salaries in case they won item A). They lost both battles.

    The executives, on the other hand, will make out with tens of millions each every year (think about it – that’s hundreds of millions over a lifetime, or even a few decades). They’ll also be hired at another tanking company and make the same money next year.

    Don’t compare the intentions of unions to men who sacrifice America’s jobs and welfare at their own expense.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber