By on June 13, 2008

bilde2.jpgWhen the going gets tough, the tough amp-up the ads. As the Detroit News reports, that's certainly the philosophy behind GM and Toyota's increased ad spend. In the teeth of the perfect storm (or dead calm) afflicting new car and truck sales, the automakers upped their first quarter ad budget by 13 and 8.4 percent respectively. That's a not-inconsiderable additional $535m for The General and $291m for the world's largest automaker. On the uh-oh side, cash-strapped Chrysler decreased their ad spend by a full 42 percent (-$186 million) while Ford sliced their ad outlay by 31 percent (-$292m). Ford mouthpiece Jim Cain provided the necessary piercing glimpse into the obvious: "The economy and vehicle sales do affect total spending." However, the DetN points out that "Ad expenses also fluctuate depending on when the Dearborn, Michigan-based company is introducing new and redesigned models." So the fact that Ford's launching the Flex in the first quarter means… what? Meanwhile, once again, Chrysler says… nothing.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

13 Comments on “Chyrsler, Ford Cut Ad Spend; GM, ToMoCo Up the Ante...”


  • avatar
    jaje

    I always see the D2.8 as companies whose major products are Press Releases and dividends. Just the other night I saw a commerical of the Explorer touting it’s environmental benefits or the Lincoln new suv with birds chirping in the background.

  • avatar

    There was a large meeting of UAW and Ford management this morning June 13th in Detroit! Does anyone know what was going on there?

  • avatar
    detroit1701

    I really liked the GM ad campaign that used that old song “Vehicle” by Ides of March. It really encapsulates, in some odd way, the essence of american cars.

    I’m a friendly stranger in a black sedan
    Won’t you hop inside my car.
    I got pictures, got candy
    I’m a loveable man
    And I can take you to the nearest star.
    I’m your vehicle baby
    I’ll take you anywhere you wanna go.

  • avatar
    seoultrain

    I’ve been watching the NBA Playoffs, and I’m so damn sick of that GMC guy. They must have his commercials on 4-6 times per hour. Does those commercials actually generate sales? Why even bother spending the money to promote GMC? dumb.

    On the other hand, that new MKS spaceship commercial is amazing. Looks great in HD, and if you’ve got a subwoofer, sounds great, too. Definitely got my heart pumping.

  • avatar
    Juniper

    Yo editor!
    check the spelling.

  • avatar
    Juniper

    The Honda add with the naked guys in the Balloon basket is too much for me.

  • avatar
    TEXN3

    I don’t Juniper, I’ve seen Chrysler spell it that way on vehicles. Same with Cryhsler…maybe that was the owner crying after he bought his Cirrus sedan.

  • avatar
    Juniper

    TEXN3
    You don’t what?

  • avatar
    umterp85

    Lets also not confuse total ad spend with advertsing effectivness. TIVO / DVR has taken a real toll on effectiveness of TV media buys. So…less spending on TV (the most expensive ad medium)does not necessarily mean the ad message is not reaching the target consumer….online, print, grassroots stuf can be just as effective as TV sometimes..or at least augment TV’s broad scale capabilities.

  • avatar
    dwford

    Bet Ford was saving their money for the 3rd qtr launches of the F150, Flex and MKS. Why beat dead horses?

    Oh, they did waste $millions on those damn Hybrid ads, though.

  • avatar
    RobertSD

    RF, you need to check the writing in this article. Those figures are not changes in spend, they are total spend. Ford is launching the Flex in Q2/Q3, not in Q1, so Ford’s ad dollars would not have shown in Q1. More importantly, given that Ford and Toyota pretty much matched each other in sales, it looks like they are both more efficient with their dollars than GM (some of that is probably the Malibu launch).

    What I’m really interested to see is the effects of Ford’s Drive One campaign (which launched just inside of Q2). Normally, I would have expected large increases in Ford spend, but with their new model of advertising, it may have actually been flat.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    I’d hazard that, unless they’re going to be spending a smaller ad budget in a smarter fashion, this is something that Ford really ought not to reduce. Product recognition is a real problem for them.

    GM, on the other hand, can turn down the bluster any time they like. Except for the Pontiac “IS CAR” videogame sport, which was genius.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    GM has such a jumble of products and brands that no amount of extra spending is going to move the needle. Heck, they are paying Rush Limbaugh to pitch the Tahoe Hybrid and European Saturn Astra on his show. No lie, the actually pay Rush to call it a European Astra. Wow, talk about using the wrong pitchman to sell the wrong products. If they really must use Rush, they should be having him tell his listeners to prove they are Red Blooded Americans by buying the biggest, baddest GMC truck or Hummer than can afford.

    Those guys and gals in GM marketing are simply brain dead. Look how the big G6 give away on Oprah worked, or the placement of the Camaro in Transformers years before you can buy the car. Then there was the Malibu ad blitz before good supplies of the car were in dealerships.

    Freaking idiots, pure and simple.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber