Find Reviews by Make:
Justin: prepare to be amazed. It works! Twice! In a row!
11 Comments on “Ferrari California Folding Roof Inaction. I mean, In Action...”
Read all comments
Latest Car Reviews view all
Latest Product Reviews view all
Recent Comments
- Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
- theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
- A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
- Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
- Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...
Car Reviews By Make view all
New Car Research
Who We Are
- Tim Healey
Managing Editor - Matt Posky
News and Social Media Contributor - Timothy Cain
Sales Analyst - Murilee Martin
Junkyard Finds Author - Matthew Guy
Contributor - Chris Tonn
Contributor
- Adam Tonge
- Bozi Tatarevic
- Corey Lewis
- Jo Borras
- Mark Baruth
- Ronnie Schreiber
That looks pretty sweet, IMHO.
Well there you have it. The MX-5 PRHT is faster than a Ferrari California.
I think 15 seconds is about the right length of time to savour every second of attention!
I don’t see what the big deal is. You can get that on the VW Eos.
Doesn’t this look a little computer generated to anyone else. Maybe its me.
Well, that actually looks quite good for once. At least when the top is up it LOOKS like a coupe, unlike some other hard top convertibles (lookin’ at you G6 and VW Eos) that look like they have extra junk in the rear.
Wow that was a really cool looking. Still think the added weight is a waste of time for a Ferrari. For the posers that don’t really buy them for the performance just the snob appeal.
No thanks. I’ll take the Alfa 8C spider. Even if I had to curse in Italian and wrestle with its top for 15 minutes.
–chuck
http://chuck.goolsbee.org
John R,
That’s definitely computer generated.
It’s a little scary how much the rear flips out during that operation. Looks like you’d want a couple feet of clearance.
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/003a_ferraricalifornia.jpg
I don’t see what the big deal is. You can get that on the VW Eos.
Yeah, but can the Eos go from zero to 60 in, say, 4 seconds flat?