By on July 16, 2008

 Korea's Kia has released photos of its Soul. To herald the U.S. arrival of its new citycar– which looks to have the Chevy's Aveo Beat– Kia's announced the Soul's engine lineup. Globally, the Soul will offer three powerplants. Yanks are denied the 1.6-liter turbodiesel with 128 horsepower. We get to choose from either a 1.6-liter, 124-horse four (the new NA class leader) or a 2.0-liter with an unspecified amount of power. The fuel economy– which RF would call "mission critical"– has not yet been rated by the EPA. Although the new car's based on the Rio platform, Kia promises that the Soul "won't drive like a mailbox." Return to sender? Let's just hope Kia's Soul has more eponymousness than its other efforts, which tend to put inhabitants in econobox Hell. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

12 Comments on “Kia Soul Engines Announced...”


  • avatar
    lewissalem

    What great timing for Kia.

    GM on the other hand:

    – The Chevrolet Beat is one of three small car concepts introduced in April 2007 at NY Auto Show.

    – http://www.vote4chevrolet.com is launched encouraging car enthusiasts to vote on which of three concepts is their favorite. This website is still live today.

    – The Beat receives the majority of votes on the website for the car GM should build. “Excitement” builds.

    – July 2008, gas prices are hovering around $4.00 per gallon.

    – July 15th, Bob Lutz announces that the US market will not get the Beat due to crash standards. They didn’t even intend it to be offered to the domestic market. Then why was the car shown in NY? Why not Geneva?

    I’m beginning to think that they deserve to fail.

  • avatar
    brettc

    I had no idea that the vote4chevrolet site was still around. I remember voting in 2007. There have been a total of 1.9 million votes. Don’t you think that would make GM get off their ass and get at least one of them ready for sale ASAP? Nevermind, we all know the answer to that…

    The Soul looks like an interesting car, but it’s too bad about the lack of a diesel. Maybe the 1.6 will have decent economy numbers though.

  • avatar
    shaker

    Definitely has the Fit in its sights; but the upgraded Fit (this fall) might trump the Soul.
    Still, bring ’em on (sorry GB), maybe this will poke GM in the ass hard enough to put some engineering (rather than marketing) into the Beat.

  • avatar
    MrDot

    It looks like what the next xB should have been before Toyota made it big, fat, and thirsty.

  • avatar
    SupaMan

    Looks interesting. That 2.0 they’re talking about could be the 140hp 2.0 from the Elantra/Spectra platform. In either case, it should be somewhat of a scorcher for such a little car.

  • avatar
    NickR

    lewissalem, when the book about GMs demise is written your post can be one small, but critical chapter. It really encapsulates everything they do wrong…bungled marketing and atrocious product planning. That announcement about the Beat was the end of the line for me…that whole saga was more about deception than it was marketing. We were all just Beating off.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    “has not yet been rated by the EPA”

    The EPA does not do fuel economy testing. The EPA publishes the procedure, but companies and/or their hired testing labs do the actual measurement.

  • avatar
    Seth L

    There’s still the one-two punch of horrible buying experience (the local kia dealer is just despicable), and brutal depreciation.

    Buy one secondhand.

  • avatar
    matt

    i wonder if they intended the pun with the name….

  • avatar
    willbodine

    I still say it would go over better as a “Kia Seoul”

  • avatar

    Hmmm, now i’m no kia fan (who is?) but i like the looks of that one. Scion rip off of course and who knows what the MPG may be of the better engine, probably iffy considering it’s well…Kia.

    I do like that exterior though.

  • avatar
    gibbleth

    I may buy one, Kia reputation be damned. Now, the wife owned a Kia Sepphia or whatever crapbox it was. Ever since then she won’t even consider a Kia. Be a hard sell, but that thing may be worth it. Either that or way more money for a dinky Mazda.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber