By on August 17, 2008

Thinking inside the Box. (courtesy dallasnews.com)Terry's one of the good guys: a plain-speaking auto reviewer/ranter for the Dallas Morning News [full version via The Washington Post] who never loses sight of the common man. Well, at least not until he's behind the wheel of a death car muscle car. And then he's gone baby gone! Despite the fact that the V8-lovin' Lone Star scribe's feeling the heat over global warming, it's one of those cold, dead hands deals. "I know that my days as an unrepentant gearhead may be numbered. Sky-high gas prices, global warming, urban sprawl, maybe even the "oil war" in Iraq, are all being piled on cars. Yet despite the growing drumbeat against them, the allegations that they're melting glaciers and maiming thousands, the claim that we're choking on them, the fear that they're our worst national addiction, I love them dearly." What follows is a poetic paean to profligate petrol consumption. Box ultimately argues against those who argue against gas-guzzling-for-fun thus: I'm a climate killer, you're a hypocrite; I'll stop when you stop. As if. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

9 Comments on “Terry Box: No Surrender!...”


  • avatar
    bluecon

    The Earth is cooling and the Arctic ice is much greater in 2008 than 2007. Soon the Globaloney Warming con job will start to be shown as the scam it was. Of course Algore will still get to keep his Nobel prize and the tens of millions he made off the scam while he continues with his King Kong size carbon footprint.

  • avatar
    hwyhobo

    I don’t care about global warming, cooling, or whatever the religion of the left is at the moment. Earth went through much bigger changes on its own.

    What I care about is dependency on the the nutjobs in the Middle East. Every time we pay for gas, we donate money to Al Qaida.

  • avatar
    rob

    It’s important that we each do our part, global warming or not. I essentially agree with hwyhobo’s second paragraph.

    A “reasonable” push for efficiency in our autos (and daily lives) is a good thing. What I’m not a fan of is the corresponding BS that has infected the green/environmental movement. Example: LS600h … great, a huge luxury car that gets the mileage of a Yukon Hybrid. Hmm, another example: Yukon Hybrid.

  • avatar

    Remember racefans, Global Warming is a Crock of ****.

  • avatar
    Dr. D

    bluecon,
    you are so correct, global warming seems to be the largest delicatessen known to mankind. Everything is fine folks, it is the way it is supposed to be.

  • avatar
    Dr Lemming

    The following link offers an indepth scientific discussion of the issue. I invite folks to share their views with some pretty high-powered specialists.

    http://www.realclimate.org/

  • avatar
    y2kdcar

    Let’s give credit where credit is due. Al Gore didn’t invent the Internet, but he did invent global warming. :-)

  • avatar
    RFortier1796

    All I know about Global Warming is back in college, we had a nice forum about it. The head of the Political Science department (and my advisor as I was a poli sci major) argued that global warming was a huge problem and we must do something to stop it. The head of the science department argued that there was no conclusive proof, the earth has gone through this sort of change before industry existed, and that it needed to stop being politicized. I was going to change my major after that…

  • avatar
    Busbodger

    I don’t see what the problem is about Global Warming. We adjust to more efficient devices that consume less energy and last longer. If we are wrong and global warming never comes then we are still better off than today. If the global warming crew is right then maybe we can change our society in time to save ourselves.

    That said I’m not a supporter of the theory. I AM a supporter of being more efficient and solving the tangible problems first like feeding the hungry around the world. No reason a child needs to be born into squallor and die before they are ten. Let’s quit supporting multi-millionare athletes/movie stars/politicians and work on bringing safety and prosperity (relative term – food on the table and a roof over their heads) to the world’s poorest.

    I think naysayers want things to just continue the way they are now – use as much as can be pumped. I worry that the origin of those attitudes lie with those who will profit from things staying the way it has been for the past 100 years. “We won’t quit pumping oil no matter what because I’m getting rich from it…”

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber