By on September 25, 2008

John Mizroch is, of course, pro-E85 to a fault. According to FarmWeek, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy told participants at a Indianapolis renewable energy conference that the nine billion gallons of ethanol “brought online to date” have saved consumers nationwide a “not-insignificant” 25 cents in per-gallon gasoline costs. And that’s just for starters. “I don’t personally believe it [corn-based ethanol] has added significantly to the price of food commodities. I think our industry could sustain up to the limits of the RFS.” (For those of you who don’t keep track of Uncle Sam’s every market distortion, that’s the federally-mandated 21b gallons of bio-fuels by 2022 Renewable Fuel Standard.) Yes, BUT– Mizroch admitted that DOE research now focuses on emerging fuel feedstocks, with “virtually no work in corn ethanol.” In other words, you got the ball rolling farmer John. We’ll take it from here. “Many of the players in the current industry are critical to the success of the future cellulosic, non-foodstock industry,” Mizroch asserted to FarmWeek. But not all or even most, we note. Well, not until the farm lobby gets involved, anyway.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “E85 Boondoggle of the Day: DOE Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Cans Corn...”


  • avatar
    menno

    Isn’t he conveniently forgetting the U.S. taxpayer’s unwilling “contribution” of some 70 cents per gallon for ethanol (7 cents per gallon on E10, 59.5 cents per gallon on E85)?

    In Plain English, our current taxation system is called Extortion With Menaces.

  • avatar
    joeaverage

    Never a better time to go electric and get rid of this background of lobbyists and special interests. Make your own fuel with your roof.

  • avatar
    joeaverage

    Oh and how much does Archer-Midlands-Daniels figure into this program and the lobbying?

  • avatar
    blindfaith

    The US road system was taxation without our consent. US folks never requested or desired to have this road system built with 100% of US tax dollars.

    The road system kills millions of dogs, cats, deer and other endangered animals included US citizens. If this polluting device were stopped. we could live a long healthy reduced taxed life span without all the stresses and strains of these unwanted taxes for ethanol.

    PS. Try drinking gasoline instead of ethanol

  • avatar
    blindfaith

    !!!! Help I drank the gas

  • avatar
    Kevin

    I think we should bail out the Ethanol industry, and then bail out everyone harmed by the ethanol industry bailout.

  • avatar
    blindfaith

    Isn’t he conveniently forgetting the U.S. taxpayer’s unwilling “contribution” of some 70 cents per gallon for ethanol (7 cents per gallon on E10, 59.5 cents per gallon on E85)?

    The ethanol is necessary to replace a natural gas ingredient that was ruining our underground water supply. The Oil companies lobbied unsuccessfully to be protected from liability from the poisoning of our wells by a lighter than water molecule create from their gas additive to oxygenate their gasoline to meet EPA standards. Luckily, congress did the right decision and did not waive their liability. So we now have an ETHALOL additive.

    Congress did the right decision???? when???

  • avatar
    Engineer

    Note how curiously the scumb… politician phrased it: I don’t personally believe it [corn-based ethanol] has added significantly to the price of food commodities. (emphasis added) He is entitled to his opinion, of couse. But I note that a World Bank report blamed biofuels for 75% of the steep increase in food prices. With all due respect Mr. Acting Assistant Secretary, your opinion is not worth a bucket of warm pi.. spit.

    In other news, politicians have voted to keep a $1/gal tax credit for biodiesel made from food, but deny the credit for green diesel made from waste fats…

    Better start saving for that Thanksgiving Turkey…

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber