“The film ‘Flash of Genius’ chronicles the life story of Bob Kearns, who asserted that he invented the intermittent windshield wiper and sued Ford, Chrysler and other automakers for patent infringement. While films like ‘Flash of Genius’ are made for entertainment purposes, the facts are often less dramatic.
Bob Kearns as well as hundreds of engineers from many companies, including Ford, helped develop the intermittent wiper as part of an evolution of existing automotive and electronic components.
While there are inaccuracies in the film, Ford sees no value in re-hashing the history of a legal case that was resolved in court almost 20 years ago, when a jury ruled that Ford did not willfully violate Mr. Kearns’ patent.
Today, Ford continues to make engineering and design breakthroughs in areas such as fuel efficiency, safety and smart technology, and is proud of its 100-year legacy of innovation in automotive technology.”
Even if this ends up as a PR disaster, it won’t be as big as “Who Killed The Electric Car”. You can quote me on that.
I can tell you from personal experience, that if you’re lucky, you’ll get a plaque with a copy of the patent on the item you invented for the automotive industry and that’s about it – again if you’re lucky.
Lawyers have done a lot to stifle innovation and invention. People don’t give their best work if they know they’ll be denied credit and reward in return.
its rather interesting to see Ford squirm a little about this. They know some people will take it seriously and think even to this day that their company might still be “crooked”.
I’m going to see this movie; it doesn’t look like a blockbuster for sure but as a car guy, why not?
ferrarimanf355 –
That’s only because the intermittent wiper is infinitely more practical than the electric car…
I thought Lucas invented the intermittent wiper….I know all my MG’s wiper’s worked intermittently.
1996MEdition :
I thought Lucas invented the intermittent wiper….I know all my MG’s wiper’s worked intermittently.
:D
Was the patent on the actual design of the electronics or on the idea of wipers that pause for a couple of seconds. I can understand the former, but not the latter.
I’ll be surprised if this movie grosses $5 million. Shouldn’t be much of a fallout, if any, for Ford.
Cavendel, You must be kidding!
In the ad for the flick now showing on TV, the inventor is offered a $30 million settlement, and refuses it because Ford won’t apologize. That is the single dumbest thing I ever heard of. No wonder he died broke and bitter. Take the money and run, always. Cash is the ultimate token of love.
Robert Schwartz,
Judging from what I’ve read about the movie, a big part of the story is that he became obsessed with the case, and in the end, he “won” but it cost him his family and a big chunk of his life, and he never really enjoyed his victory. So refusing the $30 million settlement was to be expected, based on his obsession (assuming this is accurate).
The following are some snippets from this really good article http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/02/25/005398.html
“I don’t think the goal was the magnitude of the money,” Kearns said when the Ford case was ended. “What I saw (as) my role was to defend the patent system. If I don’t go further, there really isn’t
a patent system.”
U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn, who presided over five of Kearns’ trials, said Kearns was frustrated because he wanted to be a major manufacturer.
“He was feisty, determined and he established the fact that he made a contribution to the auto industry that was unique,” Cohn said. “His zeal got ahead of his judgment.”
Maureen Kearns said her father’s home was filled with legal files. After a point, she said, “his life was simply this battle.”