By on October 18, 2008

Vigilantes painted “SCAM” on the pavement in large, white letters near a speed camera in Potomac, Maryland. The sign serves as a warning to approaching drivers that the automated ticketing machine on the side of River Road is active. WUSA television used a helicopter to capture a unique perspective on the warning. Montgomery County jurisdictions are notorious for issuing as many speed citations as possible using ticket quotas, even though the practice is banned under state law. The county program generated $7.2m worth of tickets last year. The village of Chevy Chase used cameras to nearly double its entire budget, spending a significant amount that was promised for “public safety” instead on “beautification improvements.” The latest incident marks an increase in the number of anti-camera incidents in the US. Just two months ago, vigilantes struck four speed cameras in Gaithersburg.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

13 Comments on “Maryland Vigilantes Protest Speed Camera...”


  • avatar
    CTFrank

    Anyone who destroys or otherwise disables one of those Revenue Generating Devices (they are absolutely NOT “safety” devices) should be given an award.

  • avatar
    newcarscostalot

    Score one for CTFrank! I agree.

  • avatar
    vento97

    Somewhere, George Orwell is smiling…

  • avatar
    1996MEdition

    If you drive the posted speed, the cameras suddenly become useless as revenue generators…..

  • avatar
    steveo5556

    I live about 2 miles from Potomac, MD.
    Just some information about the county/area:
    – River Road is 55mph until that speed camera where it goes down to 35mph because of a shopping area
    – Montgomery County is one of the richest personal incomes per capita in the USA, and all the cops are tough here and try to get your money
    – Our county has speed vans, speed vans are mini vans parked on neighborhood streets and streets with a speed limit of 35mph or less. The speed vans have speed cameras inside them.

    http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/25/2553.asp

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/24/AR2007082400967.html

  • avatar
    dhanson865

    @1996MEdition

    35mph or less is not a fuel efficient or time efficient speed for most vehicles and most drivers.

    Also keep in mind that 36 mph is just as ticketable as 55mph when the speed camera is involved

    Good luck finding people that will agree to drive below 35mph on a big street.

  • avatar
    cgd

    1996, you’re right, but if everyone suddenly started complying with 35, they’d probably lower it to 25 in the name of “safety,” er, revenue.

  • avatar
    AG

    They should at the very least make it harder for insurance companies to raise rates due to speeding tickets.

  • avatar
    Morea

    By the way, the mobile speed cameras in Montgomery County are in mini vans that are marked with traffic cones and large painted signs on the vans themselves, you’d have to be deaf, dumb, and blind not to see one coming up on the road. If you get caught by one you clearly are not paying attention!

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    They should at the very least make it harder for insurance companies to raise rates due to speeding tickets.

    I don’t think that camera offenses affect your insurance or criminal record anywhere I’ve heard them implemented. They’re the moving version of a parking ticket: they follow the vehicle, not the driver or owner.

  • avatar
    vento97

    I sent this article to a co-worker who lives in Montgomery County (originally from Arizona). His reply was as follows:

    “In Arizona, irate drivers blast away at speed cameras with pistols and shotguns…”

    Needless to say, I was rolling over in laughter…

  • avatar
    vento97

    1986MEdition:
    If you drive the posted speed, the cameras suddenly become useless as revenue generators…..

    I like the Arizona solution better…:)

  • avatar

    How hard would it be to get a national speed and red light camera ban in this country?

    I think there are enough people concerned with privacy, and enough data to prove that these revenue generating schemes are accident factories or worse, and have nothing to do with safety.

    You’d probably have to wage a state-by-state grassroots war to pry the greedy politicians out of the pockets they are already into, but I don’t know that there’s any cost too high not to end up like England.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber