By on October 27, 2008

From the land of speed cameras and license points comes news that a new generation of GPS satellite navigation systems could be the Next Big Nanny to take all the fun out of driving. The Times reports that TomTom and Navteq are developing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) which will take GPS far beyond its current navigation-only capabilities… with dismaying results. The new systems will reportedly tell motorists when to change gear, at what speed to take a corner and even how to drive more economically, while providing 3-D navigation and refined destination-seeking capabilities. Needless to say, the prospect of having a computer yell at you for taking corners too fast on a windy mountain road is hardly the stuff of gearhead daydreams, but as usual a higher power is at play here. Navigation system makers have been dealing with the legal reprecussions of uncritical reliance on GPS systems, such as the woman who got her SL500 stuck in mud when her sat/nav told her that a ford over the river Sence was navigable. By issuing constant feedback about driving style and possible damage to the car’s internals while improving the three-dimensional mapping, these firms hope to prevent future lawsuits. And annoy the hell out of anyone who happens to enjoy the occasional spirited drive.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “Sat/Nav Turned Nanny?...”


  • avatar
    Matthew Danda

    One more step toward fully automated cars. Then driving will be like riding horses: at one time a necessity, but now merely a hobby.

    On the flip side, though, there are a lot of times when I really don’t want to be in control of the car. When trapped in stop-and-go traffic on the Monday morning commute, for example. Better to let the GPS drive the car so I can read the paper.

  • avatar
    crc

    People who rely soley on nav systems and use zero common sense deserve to get their SL500 stuck in mud. These deuschebags continue to ruin driving for the rest of us.

  • avatar
    ComfortablyNumb

    I’m going to start working on the “sport mode” software flash that tells you how to get there FASTER…like your very own WRC copilot!

  • avatar

    How about improved apex lines on corners, maximum hold speed on cloverleafs, etc?

    I’d be happy if they just focused on getting real-time traffic more mainstreamed, rather than wasting time on all the namby-pamby stuff.

  • avatar
    highrpm

    It would be cool if these things could be turned off and on, like an Auto Pilot.

    ON for rush hour and the commute so you could watch the news or get more sleep on the ride in.

    OFF for track days and the occassional burst on an empty back road.

    If all they do is watch you as ticket-bait, then forget it.

  • avatar
    miked

    And to think, I pulled the fuse on the “Shift” light in my old Saab. That didn’t even yell at me, just put up a silly little light that told me to shift about 1000 revs to early.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    There are times (like the fiftieth late-evening drive back on Ontario’s highway 7 from Ottawa to Peterborough: no coffee shops, same scenery, not a lot of other cars on the road) where I’ve sorely wished for an autopilot.

    Driver involvement’s nice, but if I have to do the drives I’ve been doing much more often, the next car I get will have laser cruise, blind spot detection, lane-departure warning and, importantly, a “you’re falling asleep, nitwit!” system. I’m not bad at picking up on the early stages of fatigue, but I worry for the day my judgement lapses.

    At least the Fit’s seats can be folded into an (awfully uncomfortable) bed. That helps. Sorta.

  • avatar
    Areitu

    This reminds me of that pod thing Tom Cruise leaps out of, on Minority Report.

    How about offering driving and map-reading lessons? Unless cars are going 270mph on average, I don’t see why so many computer aided devices are needed.

  • avatar
    AG

    If I want to be told how to travel, I wouldn’t be driving the vehicle myself!

  • avatar
    bleach

    I don’t see how this wouldn’t drastically INCREASE their liability. How many people will be claiming their car told them to accelerate despite the car stopped in front of them?

    psarhjinian,
    Man, I hear you on that. Sounds a lot like a stretch on 35 through Oklahoma I used to take. I must have started drifting off around 6am once when I was alerted by another car honking. We both got off at the next exit where I apologized and thanked the guy. He was laughing because he’d been woken up an hour earlier doing the same. My radio was always on the rest of the times.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber