By on October 8, 2008


Paris 2008: The Girls

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

16 Comments on “Sexist Anachronism or Aesthetic Embellishment?...”


  • avatar
    USAFMech

    Yes. A thousand times Yes.

    The Estoque girl looked like she wanted to knee me in the junk and she wanted me to like it. Somehow, I think I would’ve let her.

  • avatar
    arapaima

    Most of those ladies were not too high on the attractive list. Too thin for my personal tastes.

  • avatar

    somehow I have a really hard time appreciating women who don’t look like they have a brain in their head or a personality. And yes, they are way too thin. Totally plastic.

  • avatar
    guyincognito

    So sexist!!! How could men want to look at attractive women? Men need to get over this evil, sexist attraction to women!

  • avatar
    quasimondo

    Yeah guys. Stop looking at these attractive women! Focus on the cars, the cars!

  • avatar
    srclontz

    Are the two mutually exclusive?

  • avatar

    There were cars in that video? I guess I need to watch it again.

    –chuck

  • avatar
    cgd

    OK, a woman’s perspective here. Got no problem with guys looking at attractive ladies as if they come with the cars you buy, but um, don’t women buy cars too? Where are the hunky dude eye candies for us? I have no problem as such with this–as a straight female, it merely does nothing for me!

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    The only issue I have, really, is that the videography contrived to make what were some otherwise attractive women into, well, I’m not sure. Bad angles, bad composition, bad lighting, several “learn to pan” moments” and a lot of “dear god, buy a steadycam!”.

    Most of all: you do not shoot the head and track down. Ever. Men or women, it doesn’t matter, the person’s face is the closer. Always. Panning head->body->legs just kills the anticipation and romanticism of the shot. It takes what should be an lovely introduction into something that looks like a family vacation video.

    Eurotrash Hits ’98 playing in the background is just icing on the cake, really…

    Sexism? Well, probably, yes. I’d say no if there was a male model or two, but you can’t fault their catering to the audience. Of course, there’s the argument that you’re not growing your audience, either.

  • avatar
    Pig_Iron

    I was used to auto show bimbos who opened the hood of Porsches only to be surprised to find a trunk. It was so routine it stopped being fun to mess with them.

    To Ford’s credit, the women who staffed the GT display in Detroit, the year it came out, were versed in operation and basic but accurate technical specs. They were so professional, I was embaressed by my original condescending attitude.

    They were older too; I’d say late 30s, early 40s, but you couldn’t tell unless up close. I left knowing more about the vehicle, and feeling bad that they had to get all tarted up to do job that they were more than capable of.

    I haven’t met any that capable since. I have noticed boy-toys in glee club black slacks and sweater vests, that know no more about the vehicles than the female models.

    When you’re not allowed to look under the hood, or sit in a Golf or Focus without the permission of some agency bimbo/himbo, there’s no point in going to shows anymore.

  • avatar
    golden2husky

    Girls and cars are like the Fourth of July and fireworks. But I must add, why are so many models so damn skeletal? Shesh, hit the weight room at the gym and put some mass on that body..

  • avatar
    aakash

    personally Cars turn me on more than women……..sorry ladies.

    given both r high maintenance…..but at least your car does not demand attention 24×7 and aint jealous of other cars :P

  • avatar
    thalter

    Enough already of the streetfire.net videos. None of them are particularly interesting or newsworthy.

  • avatar
    Dr Lemming

    Sure, sex sells cars. Always has, always will. That’s why it is utterly fascinating when a car brand takes a different route in its marketing, e.g., VW’s beetle campaign of the 1960s, which as I recall was decidedly bimboless.

  • avatar
    AllStingNoBling

    Well, I guess I’ll be the one to say it, but…

    What else are they good for? Really.

  • avatar
    Airhen

    Great looking women and cars always go together. What red blooded American man doesn’t like a hot woman in his passenger seat?

    And I don’t mind a thin woman at all. My wife works out a lot to keep her figure which isn’t easy in our fat society. ;)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber