By on November 4, 2008

GM Inside News (GMI) is reporting that the next gen Cadillac SRX– an “all new”  badge-engineered Saturn Vue if there ever was one (was there?)– and the new Chevy Equinox– a fuel-cell powered CUV if there never was one (was there?)– will both be blessed with GM’s new 3.0-liter direct-injected High-Feature V6. And what’s one of them, you ask? GMI reckons its a 250hp, uh, engine. Although our good friends over at Autoblog are happy to disregard GMI’s info-strictures (“Those were RUMORS though and they are very old rumors”), they’re happy to peg the new motor’s mileage at just under 30mpg (highway?). Should GM make it to that most magical of model years (2010), the Caddy CUV will also have a larger engine option (the CTS’ 3.6-liter V6, not a V8) and the Equinox will have a more CAFE-compliant po-folks 2.3-liter four, good for… moving the CUV from place to place.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

15 Comments on “Cadillac SRX and Chevy Equinox Get New 3.0-liter Direct-Injected High-Feature V6...”


  • avatar
    Justin Berkowitz

    The 2.3 raises a small question mark, only because as far as I know GM’s current 4-cylinder lineup is made up of 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4 liter engines.

  • avatar

    Wooooweee, 250 hp from 3.0L. Those wily engineers at GM are almost up to modern levels of power to displacement. Almost.

  • avatar
    1169hp

    JEC:
    Really. I’m not trying to be a smart ass, but what are other mainsteam makers naturally aspirated 3.0 ltr. engines making? 250hp sounds respectable.

    Just wondering.

  • avatar

    Any further details on the 3.0? All-new, or derived from the existing 2.8 and 3.6?

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    Does this mean that the Saturn Vue, Saab 9-4, Chevy Equinox, Pontiac Torrent (G7? G9?) and inevitable Buick and GMC variants will get the same engine?

  • avatar

    It’s derived from the current 3.6L.

  • avatar

    “High-feature” probably means DOHC and four valves per cylinder, possibly with (gasp) direct ignition and variable valve timing, things that GM still considers bleeding-edge technology.

  • avatar
    dastanley

    1.) Is this new engine vaporware like the Volt or does it actually exist?

    2.) Who cares? Will it make the vehicles in question better vehicles? Increase their resale value? Save GM?

    GM Inside News is just putting out anything to get non-TTAC readers into the showrooms. TTAC readers know better.

  • avatar
    Geo. Levecque

    What ever happened to the China sourced V6 engine for the Equinox! Decided it didnt fit anymore?

  • avatar
    fallout11

    This may be it, Geo Levecque.

  • avatar

    1169 – This is the first American motor that makes respectable naturally aspirated hp per litre. It’s been a long time coming, when everyone else around the world has had this kind of hp/litre for years. It doesn’t excuse the plethora of underpowered and oversized mills that the big three have been foisting on the public, particularly their sixes (Ford can’t squeeze more than 200 hp from 4.0L in the Mustang?). Even the V8s, while not bad engines, are hardly impressive for their power figures when you compare power to displacement. We broke the 100hp/litre mark many years ago, the American auto makers are still playing catchup.

  • avatar
    1169hp

    JEC:
    10-4 on all of that.

    I’d like to see the aforementioned 3.0 ltr. placed in the Malibu with a proper six speed manual. I’m probably in dream land though. This is of course if GM exists long enough to make a progressive decision like that.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    This is the first American motor that makes respectable naturally aspirated hp per litre. It’s been a long time coming, when everyone else around the world has had this kind of hp/litre for years.

    Who cares about hp/L, it’s all about hp/cam!

  • avatar
    KixStart

    I hope Pontiac, GMC and Buick will get versions of this. I’d hate to see them suffering for lack of first-class badge-engineered product.

  • avatar
    scrubnick

    The 3.0L V6 in my Stealth made at the end of 1990 makes 222hp. It took 18 years to get 30 more hp?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber