By on December 29, 2008

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “Does Size Matter?...”


  • avatar
    Michael Ayoub

    Ask Lotus!

  • avatar
    holydonut

    Last I checked there is still a market for 7 – passenger SUVs. You could make the argument that there are too many vehicles in that segment at this time, but that’s the fault of the business plan for every automaker that currently operates in North America.

  • avatar
    BMW325I

    Just shows how inflated the prices are on a Cadillac. How about Gm shows the most fuel efficient Mini.

  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    Their marketing department should be sacked immediately. Does anyone know who it is??

    What possible research is telling them to strengthen the association of Cadillac with GM? How long have these campaigns been running?

  • avatar
    improvement_needed

    love the voice over:

    … buy for ~ 55k
    get a total value ~ 15k

    seems about right!!!

  • avatar

    Big, bold, powerful, and a comfortable ride. The CTS isn’t a real Cadillac in the classic sense, the Escalade is.

    Cadillac used to sell cars that embodied all those qualities and people bought them. Then they started messing with them, shrinking them, and neutering them. When the Escalade arrived it more than anything it recalled the golden era when Cadillacs were the above and people bought it.

    Why can’t GM apply the classic Cadillac formula to a car? Oh right, they’re too busy gutting Cadillac with alphabet soup names, making the cars smaller and cheaper to collide with Chevrolet and they can’t afford to build a real Cadillac aside from this car anymore.

    Such a shame.

  • avatar
    Hank

    Escalade = Sucker

    Every time. Just a tarted up Tahoe looking for a fool to spend an extra $20,000+ on a big tacky badge.

  • avatar
    John R

    “Why can’t GM apply the classic Cadillac formula to a car?”

    Because a lot of people don’t buy that brand of milk anymore. We live in an ageist society, unfortunately, and there was a time (perhaps still today) when those who were young and affluent wouldn’t be caught dead in a Caddy. That’s what their grandparents drove.

    You can’t throw a rock without hitting an Infiniti G or M or a BMW 3 or 5. GM needed a car to earnestly compete in the luxury sedan segment and the Catera & STS were simply not on people’s radar. Don’t even mention SAAD.

    Getting back to the commercial. Here we go again. Once more on to the breach of insulting the consumer’s intelligence, GM marketing department! A MINI Cooper S convertible, really? Next they’ll be telling me that it has better mileage than this Subaru*

    (*WRX STI model shown)

    I watched that mess while watching the Eagles’ game. The only reason I laughed harder at the game was because the Dallas Cowbums got what they deserve, a massacre.

  • avatar
    allegro con moto-car

    Since when did GM and their premier car brand resort to toilet bowl marketing?

    They hype an EPA 20 MPG city on a HYBRID vehicle, then they tell you at what price the non-hybrid can be purchased for.

    Switch-and-bait marketing approved by the morally corrupt Wagner. Now we know what the corporate culture at GM is all about.

    GM needs a cleansing that can only be performed with a bankruptcy procedure. ‘Nuf said.

  • avatar
    200k-min

    This whole “surprised” ad campaign by GM is further proof that nobody is cross shopping their products.

    I’m sure GM has some department in Ren Cen that discovered most people don’t have a clue what GM has to offer, told marketing, who dreamed up this ridiculout ad campaign to “lure” people onto their lots.

    Only problem is, nobody is going to buy an Escalade over a Lexus because of MPG’s. Nobody is visiting those GM lots because they have an image problem, and touting MPG’s isn’t going to correct that. John R hit the nail on the head, nobody is buying GM’s brand of milk anymore.

  • avatar
    ZoomZoom

    improvement_needed :

    love the voice over:
    … buy for ~ 55k
    get a total value ~ 15k
    seems about right!!!

    Yes, I did that double-take, too!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber