By on December 2, 2008

In addition to my robust obsession with cars, I’m also very much a fan of new technology. Be it computers, cell phones, wristwatches that wash dishes, or high-powered laser staplers, I’m interested. To keep up to date (especially since I am more of a gadget window shopper), I’m a frequent visitor at a number of the gadget blogs on the web. You might be surprised (though probably not) at the similar themes between these gadget blogs and their commenters with the car blogging community. I’ve got nine of ’em.

1. Endless supply of leaked images of upcoming products. The images are usually low quality, blurry, low resolution, and supposedly from a distant country. They are frequently accused of being fakes or photochops. Usually destroy most of the hype by bludgeoning readers with boredom and frustration.

Cars: Sports cars, including but not limited to the Nissan GT-R, Chevy Camaro, and Dodge Challenger.
Gadgets: Every phone, computer, and Apple product.
Bonus!: Comments that are marginally related, blanket views of the brand (I hate Chevy).

2. Circular Outsourcing Debate. Invariably a “site of manufacture” issue arises, leading to a meandering and unresolvable debate about any commerce taking place outside of the U.S. Often leads to jingoistic — even borderline bigoted — comments about other countries.

Cars: “Buy GM, Ford, or Chrysler, or watch your children starve.”
Gadgets: “I hate call centers where the workers have a hint of an accent.”

3. New major technology is the great Satan. The world’s problems, from hunger to ethnic cleansing, pale in comparison to what really matters: manufacturers are cramming a new system down my throat and I will expend huge sums of money and effort to avoid it. Workarounds, regardless of the difficulty and risk, are welcomed.

Cars: iDrive, other nav systems
Gadgets: Windows Vista

4. Readers claim to have identified the best brand in the industry. They further state that they intend only to buy this brand, describe their flawless ownership experience of the brand’s products, longevity, overall value, and general joie de vivre.

Cars: BMW
Gadgets: Apple

5. Readers hate this brand, and its customers, who the readers would take delight in turning cannibal on, given the opportunity. What’s more, their products are overpriced, the customer service is horrendous, the quality is poor, and devotees of this brand are foolish zombies that deserve to be dropped out of a helicopter, naked, into the Canadian wilderness.

Cars: BMW
Gadgets: Apple

6. News About Alternative Energy Idea/Program/Product/Research

Cars: Nuclear is the answer
Gadgets: Nuclear is the answer

7. The bad price patrol. These are commenters for whom no product, ever, will be cheap enough. It’s not necessarily that they can’t afford something (in fact, many will point out that they could afford to buy whatever car/gadget they want, ten times over, in cash), but whatever the retail price is, that’s absurd. They will conclude by either sarcastically thanking the seller or by repeating that they plant to stick with whatever comparable product they currently have.

Cars: “They want $15,000 for that new 800 horsepower sports car that gets 50 mpg? What a rip off. I’ll just have a Honda Fit, thank you. Or stay with my 1983 Peugeot 505 wagon. And keep in mind, I’m not poor. I almost bought a Maybach instead of my Peugeot.”
Gadgets: “Wait wait, the service is an ADDITIONAL $3/month? And the device doesn’t have Draft-N wireless? What kind of 1983-reminiscent joke is that? I’ll just stick with my Nokia N95.”

8. “I refuse to answer the question because this is bullshit.”

Cars: What should Alan Mulally drive to DC? Screw Alan Mulally, his Lexus, his company, and every POS that Ford makes.
Gadgets:
How would you improve X product? Use a sledgehammer to turn it into powder.

9. Dealbreakers. These are issues around which people are willing to completely alter their purchase. It’s not always that they refuse to buy something because it emits toxic fumes. Rather, there is a feature that is absolutely non-negotiable. Such people often like to trumpet “No _____, no buy” to show their steadfast resolve.

Cars: Stick
Gadgets: DRM-Free/or Linux capability

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “Nine Similarities Between Car Blogs and Gadget Blogs...”


  • avatar
    AKM

    Dedfinitely recognized myself in a few of those…Thanks for the laugh, justin.

    And yes, Apple sucks. Great hardware, horrendous software. I hate Apple zombies. BMW is different: great cars, but too often people driving them have no idea of what they have in their hands, and care only about the propeller badge.

  • avatar
    JSForbes

    What about dumb lists?

  • avatar

    Justin’s implementing the Top 9. But why stop there? It could be the Top 8.

    5-minute abs?? You can’t get a good cardio workout in only 5 minutes!

    Or maybe it should be 11. Because 11 is louder than 10.

    Forgive me – I’m loopy with horrendous November sales news today.

    Thanks for the break from the insanity Justin.

  • avatar
    jems86

    “3. New major technology is the great Satan. The world’s problems, from hunger to ethnic cleansing, pale in comparison to what really matters: manufacturers are cramming a new system down my throat and I will expend huge sums of money and effort to avoid it. Workarounds, regardless of the difficulty and risk, are welcomed.
    Cars: iDrive, other nav systems
    Gadgets: Windows Vista”

    jajajaja This is a very good example of what I believe about stupid Vista.

    “6. News About Alternative Energy Idea/Program/Product/Research
    Cars: Nuclear is the answer
    Gadgets: Nuclear is the answer”

    Considering the latest development in batteries’ technologies the answer is (for both): Fuel Cells!!

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    Oh god, was that funny. Especially the N95 comment, mostly because I’ve heard it.

    I believe #9 Cars should read “Diesel, wagon, stick”.

  • avatar

    This is why I enjoy Firefox + Greasemonkey so that I can display=none the ID tags that display the comments. It’s the only way to survive an Autoblog experience. Or Anandtech.

    In non-dork terms, I turn comments off. Everywhere.

  • avatar
    Martin Schwoerer

    Anybody who posts anything about the 6000 SUX is a friend of mine.

  • avatar
    Jonny Lieberman

    Except that windows Vista IS the great satan

  • avatar
    Justin Berkowitz

    @Jonny Lieberman:

    I wouldn’t know. I only have Apple computers because the clever ads on TV told me to buy them.

  • avatar
    dolometh

    that 6000SUX pic just provided me with hours of meandering websurfing – thank you!

  • avatar
    Riz

    But … will it blend?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber