By on January 13, 2009

After a weekend of concept-touting and audacious hoping, Detroit is praying that the bitter taste of bailout beggary will be cleansed by the redemptive powers of PR. From the sight of hundreds of rallying GM workers to a lineup of future concepts, the North American International Auto Show played host to a number of highly-managed media messages aimed at convincing skeptics that it’s no longer such a lonely world for American automakers. But the emphasis on public relations highlights how far Detroit still has to go, and fails to mask the desperate need for, well, bankruptcy. And while cheerleaders for a largely-imagined Detroit renaissance hold on to that feeling, time marches remorselessly on.

The unifying theme of Detroit’s campaign for hearts and minds: a throwback to the good old days. Back when city boys were the plucky, working class heart of the nation. “Detroit: not a town of quitters,” is how the Freep‘s Sarah A Webster frames the argument, Webster posits that a car wash billboard on Woodward Ave– which reads “never give up”– exemplifies this civic pride. “For all I know,” writes Webster, “it’s been up there for years.” Which is a major part of the problem. Detroit’s automakers have been in savage decline for so long that most Americans don’t even know what they would come back to become.

Webster notes that she “quite ironically” first noticed the sign’s long-running message of not quitting “on Dec. 12, the morning after the U.S. Senate voted against lending Detroit’s automakers the $14 billion they sought to survive the global economic downturn.” At that dark hour, the sign on Woodward shone like a beacon of hope to Webster after “Congress had just voted to turn the lights out on the Motor City.” As a “darkest moment before sunrise” though, this hardly inspires the kind of faith and sympathy that Detroit is clearly looking for. It simply highlights the new reality of Detroit as an oversized, reality-ignoring, bailout-begging hype machine.

Motown’s plucky, blue-collar image overhaul depends on prodding Americans to reach back to a decades-old model of a successful, competitive Detroit. To pull off its Lazarus risen act, Detroit must also hide the fact that the road to redemption doesn’t lead through River Rouge or Hamtramack. It comes in the form of government checks. And this causes internal discord, cognitive dissonance and a renewed emphasis on style over substance.

Should Chrysler not be “stung” by GMAC’s extra $6b worth of TARP loving? After all, if one American automaker can have its self-destructive incentive binges underwritten by the government, shouldn’t they all? Besides, if Chrysler can convince no less than the LA Times‘ Dan Neil that its 200C concept is a “real-world car” and that it “will be available in two years” (actual car courtesy of Nissan), isn’t that good enough for some know-nothing congressmen?

With Obama’s vast stimulus under debate in the new congress, the Detroit Auto Show was not a showcase of the consumer-driven products that the once-big three can put on the showroom floor. It was a message to lawmakers that Detroit could fulfill their politically-driven goals as long as the checks keep coming. And the transition from a consumer-driven culture in Detroit (if such a thing ever existed) to a politically-driven one shouldn’t be difficult.

GM, Chrysler and Ford executives are forever bemoaning the American consumer’s ignorance of their product’s self-evident desirability. And the oft-touted “perception gap” is much easier to tackle among easily-influenced subsidy check signers in DC than it is among financially struggling Americans.

AdAge reports that a $50m effort to revamp the image of American automakers in the minds of consumers is failing to gain traction, despite David E. Davis’ midwifery and the blessing of Lee Iaccoca. Ford is especially trying to distance itself from these efforts, rightly believing that associating itself with the PR efforts of tax money-guzzlers is counterproductive, at least in terms of consumer opinion.

Now that GM and Chrysler are on the dole, they can not deny that they have lost their way. As TTAC’s Ken Elias wrote this morning, decades of denial can only be swept away with a quick admission of guilt and a plausible vision of a brilliant future. But Detroit chases feelings of nostalgia and futurism while remaining stuck in a dismal and seemingly eternal present.

Detroit has singularly failed to understand that the classic American narratives of rebirth and redemption begins with a dark night of the soul– not a trip to DC to ask Santa for a multi-billion dollar bailout. A bankruptcy reorganization would not only have given GM and Chrysler the tools to transform themselves, it would have given Americans a reason to cheer for new underdog brands, freed from their toxic legacies.

Instead, Detroit is trying to conjure up sympathy by ignoring the rules, begging for money and selling a future they know is out of reach without more handouts. And even, one must now conclude, with them.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

17 Comments on “Editorial: Don’t Stop Believing...”


  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    Interesting. Maybe if they take the other piece about truth and honesty to heart (GM Deathwatch 227), and stop believing in lies it would be better for them.

    TINSTAAFL!

  • avatar
    no_slushbox

    A huge bailout backlash is going to build, and it will put GM and Chrysler (if it unfortunately still exists) through BK. The Detroit automakers arrogantly feel that they are accountable to nobody; but House of Representatives terms are only 2 years long.

    However that’s 2 more years of incompetent management making multi-million dollar salaries, bond holders receiving full interest payments and company destroying UAW workers living better than the people that have to pay to bail them out.

    And that’s what the stakeholders in the Detroit automakers care about; simply extending their unsustainable lifestyles as long as possible. Not the future of the US auto industry.

    That said, so far Ford has avoided going on welfare. You probably should not buy a new car in this economy, but if you are going to buy a new big-3 car buy a Ford. The government is trying to undermine Ford by providing subsidized financing to its failed competitors, so Ford needs all the help it can get.

  • avatar
    RedStapler

    By going on the dole GM and Chrysler have also alienated a decent segment of their conservative pickup truck driving customer base. I suspect many will go to Ford.

  • avatar
    GoHuskers

    ‘And that’s what the stakeholders in the Detroit automakers care about; simply extending their unsustainable lifestyles as long as possible. Not the future of the US auto industry.”

    I agree completely. And this corrupt logic could be extended to much of Wall Street, CEOs, and the Congress.

  • avatar
    ermalm

    My crystal ball…..Obama’s financial stimulus package will include billions to create green future aka green cars. All the billions needed to keep the UAW and domestics in business for at least next two years. (This is part of the 3 million jobs saved/created!)

    A full-blown government subsidized green machine manufacturer, with a small side business of consumer-driven product.

  • avatar
    Geotpf

    If Obama’s stimulus package merely consists of building lots of bridges and roads and schools and stuff that everybody except the biggest Ayn Rand worshipper agrees that the government should do, that alone will help the Detroit Three. Construction companies given big public works projects need to buy lots of pickups, and they ain’t buying them all from Toyota and Nissan.

  • avatar
    CarnotCycle

    My crystal ball…..Obama’s financial stimulus package will include billions to create green future aka green cars. All the billions needed to keep the UAW and domestics in business for at least next two years. (This is part of the 3 million jobs saved/created!)

    A full-blown government subsidized green machine manufacturer, with a small side business of consumer-driven product.

    I see something similar to what you indicate here. Some kind of twisted version of Amtrak or the Post Office, but it makes things…for sale, where there’s other options. Eventually, all mail trucks will be GMC’s, all FBI blah-cars will be Buicks, etc. Caddies will still be nice, and probably gas-hogs, too. Those cars are for the politicians, and like the corporate fleet of jets over at Andrews AFB, those are never second-rate.

    I found all the criticism of the Bailing CEO’s coming down to D.C. from the likes of Congressmen to be just a tad kettles-calling-pots-black. After Nancy was made Speaker, she fought with the bureaucracy and won so as to “upgrade” the Speaker’s plane from the plebian Gulfstream (VC-something in Air Force land) allowed the previous Speaker to a the Government’s VIP version of a Boeing 757. Apparently she “needed” it to accommodate all the six-figure sycophants that accompany her between her mansion in San Francisco and her tony Georgetown digs in D.C. Gotta love it.

  • avatar
    ravenchris

    GoHuskers, endeavor not to vote for incumbent campaigners.

  • avatar
    like.a.kite

    no_slushbox: The government is trying to undermine Ford

    You’re sure about that, are you?

  • avatar
    mtypex

    If the government subsidized Ford, they’d demand resurrection of the Tempo/Topaz line.

  • avatar
    snafu

    Knee jerk. they don’t cheer when its going good. You gotta cheer all the time. Blasphemy, a blast 4 you.

  • avatar
    brush

    cant find the right spot for this news
    http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/718902/ford-to-axe-credit-arm-160-jobs-lost perhaps somebody can move it to the correct location. I like the line about mitsubishi and toyota.

  • avatar
    rtz

    That auto bailout was a huge waste of money. They are going to spend that money and still be in the same situation that money was supposed to get them out of.

    The bank bailout even more so. They blew that money the first day. Poof. It was all gone just like that. Evaporated into thin air.

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    rtz,

    Last news report I had seen on the Bank bailout was that the book value of loans and equity was worth about 78% of the money spent.

    I am against all these bailouts, but let’s try to keep the facts straight.

  • avatar
    RogerB34

    ‘And that’s what the stakeholders in the Detroit automakers care about; simply extending their unsustainable lifestyles as long as possible. Not the future of the US auto industry.”

    Major part: Congress will bailout UAW for $70 per hour wages. Done deal. Payoff.

    Separate is bailout of subprime deadbeats and debtors. Also bailout of Mortgage Backed Securities by – Look in the mirror.

  • avatar
    scartooth

    Whats going to back lash is the AMERICAN people now that they have woke up to the fact that foreign businesses only take jobs away from America. Now that they are realizing the impact foreign Automakers and foreign companies will fall. These foreign businesses have punished Americans for far to long with their poisoned goods and tainted sub par products. President Obama knows whats been going on in this country and transparency will end the Foreign payoffs, and with new rules and regulations and with universal fair trade practices and the reduction in sales in this country will bankrupt these foreign businesses as they are trying to do to American businesses. What comes around goes around

  • avatar
    scartooth

    In my opinion the only people that buy foreign products have serious disorders. For one they are ignorant to the fact that by buying foreign products they send their monies out of the country thereby eliminating jobs in the USA. They also dont realize or dont care that they are subsidizing child labor and unregulated pollution that is generated in these countries. They also dont realize or dont care that the food product they purchase from these countries go virtually unchecked and what the label says is not what they get. From lead tainted toys to poisoned pet foods to unregulted fishing of all species,fish,whales,lobsters,shrimp. They deplete the oceans with no regard to anyone or anything except the dollar. Here in the USA we have laws and our businesses adhere to those laws in order to keep our people healthy and we have laws so we dont overfish the oceans and we have laws to keep people from exploiting child labor and we have laws governing pollution from leaving our factories and these cost our companies money and therby increasing the costs of AMERICAN products. This is why we had TARIFFS and these reasons are why we used to sanction governments that agreed with these policies. We need true leadership in our Government again and we need to sweep the flor clean of corrupt politicians and WE as AMERICANS need to buy AMERICAN MADE PRODUCTS.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber