By on January 22, 2009

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

21 Comments on “GM Turns Its Back on Its SUVs and Pickups...”


  • avatar
    86er

    I don’t mean to rain on anyone’s parade, but it was those truck and SUV sales (read: profits, albeit less now) that allowed GM to develop all these shiny new SUV-looking non-SUVs.

  • avatar
    John R

    “…bought SUVs to accommodate our families…”

    HA! Self image is a hell of a thing, too. If accommodating people were the primary prerequisite Chrysis might not be in such bad shape. I’ve seen more people fit in a Quest than I’ve seen in an Expedition.

  • avatar

    John R. beat me too it. Yes, if they had been looking for lots of space, rather than their (apparently missing) masculinity, they would have bought minivans.

    And call these new replacements for SUVs what they are: station wagons. (That marketing name is another symptom that people are seeking self image, and not practicality.)

  • avatar
    26theone

    yeah makes alot of sense. Top 2 vehicles sold in 2008:

    1) Ford F-150
    2) Chevy Silverado

  • avatar
    roadracer

    Those of us who tow trailers don’t have much use for minivans; it’s not all image.

  • avatar

    Yeah, right.

    Even now more people want to buy the Silverado from GM than anything else. They obviously cannot completely abandon trucks or SUVs as those are the types of vehicles Americans want to buy from them the most.

    What they need to stop doing is releasing an endless amount of them under multiple brands. Like the upcoming GMC Terrain, and the Cadillac SRX, and the Saturn Outlook (as good as it is) and other more niche SUVS at weak brands that are unlikely to sell well at all.

  • avatar
    Hank

    John R, I agree. My inlaws’ Suburban holds no more than my minivan, and I get all the same gear on board and get 20% better mpg. As a bonus, I can also navigate the stadium parking lot without a tug boat & lines.

  • avatar
    dgduris

    Three thoughts:

    1. Horses for courses.

    2. Did GM introduce anything in Detroit that they will actually make before they go belly-up?

    3. GM, welcome to the cross-over era. But you’re a little late. The Outback has been around for quite some time now.

  • avatar
    KixStart

    roadracer: “Those of us who tow trailers don’t have much use for minivans; it’s not all image.”

    My minivan is rated to tow 3500lbs. I doubt I could accomodate two or three horses in a covered trailer but a sailboat or fishing boat I would actually be willing to buy would fit into that and renting a U-Haul and moving a kid from one end of the state to another is certainly within its capability.

    I know a couple people who bought Suburbans, etc, so that they could tow something big, when the need arose… like they when they finally bought that big power boat or whatever. They never did buy the big boat but they still had to make the payments and fill the tank.

  • avatar

    I know a couple people who bought Suburbans, etc, so that they could tow something big, when the need arose… like they when they finally bought that big power boat or whatever. They never did buy the big boat but they still had to make the payments and fill the tank.

    Heard that one many times. People buy for what they “might someday” do but never do it.

    John

  • avatar
    threeer

    Does this mean I can find a killer deal on a standard cab/standard bed Silverado now to haul my crap two states over for my new job? My 2006 Fusion just won’t hold a bed!

  • avatar
    jimmy2x

    Yes, if they had been looking for lots of space, rather than their (apparently missing) masculinity, they would have bought minivans.

    Isn’t it about time to abandon the “small penis” crap. Most cars are bought with some sort of self-image in mind. Thus it has always been, otherwise, everyone would drive Civics, Corollas, and mini-vans. Does anyone really “need” an LS400, Porsche, or virtually any “sports-car”?

    I see nothing wrong with folks buying what they want. Its their money after all.

  • avatar
    montgomery burns

    I love the guy talking about aerodynamics in front of the flat plate front end. “Well we put an airdam on it…”

  • avatar

    Extra space with carlike stance and MPG’s? Has everyone forgotten what station wagons were? Oh right I forgot, they’re DOA and apparently SW’s an insult for some people.

  • avatar
    jkross22

    @jimmy2x:

    “I see nothing wrong with folks buying what they want. Its their money after all.”

    No, it’s their money until the government says it’s their money.

  • avatar
    rochskier

    @ SirRoxo:

    There is indeed a large, moneyed segment of the population with a seemingly pathological hatred of the station wagon or anything resembling one.

    Unless you raise the wagon 4 or 5 inches.

    And call it an “ESS-YUU-VEE”!

  • avatar
    dgduris

    or an Outback.

  • avatar
    BuzzDog

    @jimmy2x: I see nothing wrong with folks buying what they want. Its their money after all.

    Then how come I can’t buy any EU-market or JDM-market model I desire, or for that matter, a new vehicle without pollution controls and safety features?

    I’m all for free markets, but the argument that “people should be able to buy whatever they want” has more holes in it than the bed of a mid-80’s pickup that’s spent its life in the upper Midwest.

  • avatar
    jimmy2x

    I’m all for free markets, but the argument that “people should be able to buy whatever they want” has more holes in it than the bed of a mid-80’s pickup that’s spent its life in the upper Midwest.

    Pleeze – I made no reference to grey market or vehicles not up to current safety standards. I just get tired of the current “herd mentality” that pile on people for owning vehicles that somehow have been determined to be either politically incorrect or penis enhancers.

  • avatar
    geeber

    BuzzDog: Then how come I can’t buy any EU-market or JDM-market model I desire, or for that matter, a new vehicle without pollution controls and safety features?

    You should be directing your ire at the federal government, which forbids the importation of those vehicles, not GM or SUV owners.

  • avatar
    BuzzDog

    No ire here, and no disagreement. Just pointing out that we need to look at all sides of public policy decisions. After all, CAFE was largely responsible for the increased popularity of truck-based vehicles.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber