By on January 8, 2009

You can sort of understand why Nissan decided to pull out of the Detroit Auto Show, er North American International Auto Show. For carmakers, these are the worst of times and the worst of times. But The New York Times reports that Nissan went on to strong-arm their Detroit area dealers into staying home as well. The locals had come up with a plan to staff a Nissan show presence on their own dime. Corporate’s stated reason for weaseling-out back of NAIAS in November: they had “no major new products to show.” And furthermore “the current economic conditions will impact the shows’ marketing effectiveness.” Nissan used those same reasons to back out of the Chicago Auto Show. But wait, it gets stranger. Nissan spokesdude Brian Bockman said that Chicago is back on after corporate “worked with our Chicago-area dealers and came up with a good creative solution that we could maintain a presence while still having an eye toward the challenging market out there.” One function of these regional auto shows: get potential customers out looking at the goods and falling in love. In fact, Nissan’s Detroit area dealers are pretty chapped about missing the shot at their traditional post auto show sales up-tick. The question is: why it is great for the Chicago dealers to put on a presence, but not OK for Detroit’s already challenged Nissan dealers to do the same? Could it be that Nissan corporate a stick it to all things Detroit agenda? Does Chicago’s home town status for the new President-elect have something to do with this? Damn strange. Any Nissan insiders care to share the real story?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

7 Comments on “Nissan Asks Dealers to Skip Detroit Auto Show...”


  • avatar
    bleach

    Well, the Chicago show has been more of a giant showroom gallery than an auto show with new product reveals and concept car spectacles.

  • avatar
    truthbetold37

    Michigan is just not a big market for Nissan. California and Tennessee (obviously) are the biggest US markets.

    The Detroit show doesn’t give the bang for the buck that Chicago would.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    “Michigan is just not a big market for Nissan.”

    OK, but why arm-twist the dealers there into not participating? I understand Nissan proper skipping Detroit, but telling their supposedly independent dealers not to … what gives?

  • avatar

    There are a few things in play here. Chicago has always been focused on selling cars and I’m pretty sure that the dealer reps at the show during the public days can take orders for cars. So in Chicago, it really hurts not to display. In Detroit, at least for the time being, DADA, the show organizers doesn’t allow anything to be sold retail on the show floor, not even t-shirts, certainly not cars. This may change because Cobo may get status as a sales tax free zone but meanwhile there’s less downside to not displaying in Detroit.

    Another factor is that the car companies are going to show off how coarse their hair shirts are. They’re terrified of news articles about wining and dining reporters or any perceived extravagance at the NAIAS. NAIAS is still the 800 lb gorilla of North American car shows. This year there are 5500 journalists in Detroit. Chicago might get 1/4 of that. So Detroit’s under a microscope. I think Nissan alluded to all this with “the current economic conditions will impact the shows’ marketing effectiveness.” In other words, show attendees and media will see the display as a waste of money.

    Maybe we’ve reached the point where any advertising and promotion by car companies has some kind of backlash. A brave new world where traditional marketing is no longer effective.

  • avatar
    Viceroy_Fizzlebottom

    I’m just glad Nissan decided to stay in the Chicago Auto Show. I would’ve been very disappointed not being able to see the new Z in person this year

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    OK, but why arm-twist the dealers there into not participating?

    Control.

    The Chicago operation will have corporate involvement, the Detroit one would not. Nissan doesn’t want a Nissan-branded, but not Nissan-run, presence at Detroit, and since they won’t spend the money, they won’t get a say.

  • avatar
    TaurusGT500

    psarhjinian : OK, but why arm-twist the dealers there into not participating? Control.

    Big shows are really two shows. The first is the corporate-reveal-new-model-media-dog-and-pony-shrimpfest. Nissan and others made business decisions to pull out of Detroit …fair enough.

    The other show the public days where it’s basically a huge showroom under one roof of all most of the brands for sale in the US.

    That’s a week+ of the unwashed masses pawing the sheetmetal. The corporate suits are long gone. This is the dealer part of the show.

    Psarhjinian nailed it in that the kibosh must be a corporate control thing. (“Ya know… our crazy dealers… you never know what they’re going to do or say”.)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber