By on January 28, 2009

The last time we heard that GM’s new Flint engine plant was canceled, we listed it as a Volt Birth Watch. After all, Flint was supposed to produce 1.4 liter four-cylinder engines for Volt range-extender duty as well as for the Cruze and siblings (in turbo form). But as we noted then, GM insists that Volt and Cruze will go ahead as planned regardless of whether the Flint plant is built. How? By importing 1.4s from Austria, according to MLive. But are imported engines included in those old “unprofitable at $40k” Volt cost estimates? We’d guess not. In any case, ABC reports that Flint conctracts have been canceled, and GM just ain’t sweating these details. Volts will have engines come 2010, and damn the german accent. And massive unprofitability. And already-approved tax credits. And patriotic subtext.  So really, this is just another “GM manages to pee on its own leg” post. The Volt is just fine, thanks for asking.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

14 Comments on “On Again-Off Again Flint Engine Plant Off Again...”


  • avatar
    Geotpf

    Does GM cancel and approve everything at least twice? You get whiplash watching their announcements and then their announcements of their cancellation of their previous announcement and then their uncancellation of their cancellation of their previous announcement and then their cancellation of the uncancellation of their cancellation of their previous announcement.

  • avatar
    NN

    Korean batteries, Euro engine, American tax dollars.

  • avatar
    mtypex

    @ NN: It’s truly a ‘global’ endeavor!

  • avatar
    Bunter1

    NN-Wait until they start shipping the bodies from Korea!

    Bunter

  • avatar
    Robbie

    NN, Bunter: GM should not be blamed for trying to find the best and cheapest parts anywhere they can. The alternative is producing an even more unprofitable vehicle with domestic parts only.

  • avatar
    mytruth

    She should have stuck with acting.

    Politics aside, you can bet the same numbers (transport costs, labor costs, tax credits, federal loans…) are being crunched 10 times a day, 10 different ways along the river. Whoever gets closest to 2 + 2 = 3 wins, until someone else gets closer. Bye for now, see you soon Flint Engine.

  • avatar
    Bunter1

    Robbie-I don’t blame them for that at all.

    I do blame them for doing it while they wave a flag in my face and have their hand in my wallet.

    That’s all.

    Bunter

  • avatar
    bluecon

    Very difficult and a long lead time to build an engine plant from scratch. They would be building the tooling and lines right now if they wanted to launch in 2008. And soon they would be starting the install and they need to build a building right now if they are not using existing.

    And us Canadians would liketo take this opportunity to thankyou Americans for taking Governor Granholm off our hands.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    Austrian engine.
    Korean batteries.
    American Innovation!

    “And us Canadians would liketo take this opportunity to thank you Americans for taking Governor Granholm off our hands.”

    She sure has an interesting resume. Former “The Dating Game” contestant, “Miss San Carlos” winner and failed actress. Wikipedia sure can be entertaining:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_Granholm

  • avatar
    akear

    German Platform
    Korean batteries
    European designed engine
    European built engine
    German chief engineer

    Sounds like an American De-evolution. (Put a devo group picture here.)

    At least in the depression American designed and engineered their own cars.

    Anything stinks…………

  • avatar
    rdodger

    Flint has a fairly new engine plant next to the site of where the Volt engine was/is planning to be built. Why can’t GM save some money and convert it over?

  • avatar
    njoneer

    Complete. Lack of. Leadership.

    There is no forward-looking vision. No leader to set a target and require the company to hit the target. GM mangement only reacts to outside circumstances, late. And then second- (and third-) guesses every decision.

  • avatar
    Luther

    Wretched little parasites, ain’t she?..She reminds me of Baghdad Bob.

  • avatar
    jerry weber

    Remember all of this blovating is on a car yet to be produced at a price point nearly twice it’s competitors. Americans don’t trust: GM to actually build the thing in quantity, Stand behind the vehicle in quality and promotion, improve the vehcile with model updates, go the distance by still be building it in 10 years. In other words, make this a good investment that depreciates at a normal rate. Too many have already moved past GM and will not look back to any more of their “game changers”.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber