Latest auto news, reviews, editorials, and podcasts

By on January 9, 2009

From menno: “My Prius is now down to about 30 miles per gallon on E10 (real MPG, not on the computer – it’s showing 38.5 mpg). 130 miles on the trip meter and over 4 gallons used – you do the math. Just for the sake of comparison, before the loss of real gasoline, I was averaging 44 mpg (real calculations and on the car computer) in the winter, and about 50 in spring and fall, and 48 in the summer. This was with both the 2005 Prius and the 2008, over 48,000 miles on the 2005 and now having 21,000 miles on the 2008. Don’t know if the continuous E10 has made the difference between the computer MPG and calculated MPG, but there is essentially no point in having a Prius anymore. The Prius sucks ethanol tainted fuel like a drunk at a free bar. My wife’s (way) less expensive to buy, more comfortable, zoomier, roomier and nicer Sonata averages MPG in the low-mid 20’s in the winter, 26-27 in spring, summer and fall, and did 32.2 mpg on a 5000 mile trip on expressways and in mountains. As soon as gas prices hit $3.00 a gallon I’m putting the Prius up for sale. Recently, the last gas stations in the area stopped selling 100% gasoline (it was BP). The resulting MPG loss was immediate.” And he’s not the only one who’s turning his back on E10…

(Read More…)

By on January 9, 2009

By on January 9, 2009

Yes, it’s that time again. Time for the Paris – Dakar Rally (a.k.a. “the most dangerous race in the world”), where large trucks, cars and motorcycles drive as fast they possibly can across the African continent. Oops. Sorry. It’s the Dakar rally now, ’cause it’s taking place in South America, even though Dakar (Senegal) is, you know, in Africa. Last year, the race was cancelled due to “terrorist threats.” The fact that the race features a bunch of Europeans tear-assing across open territory– occasionally mowing down innocent bystanders (called “spectators” by race organizers)– might have a little something to do with it. About.com glibly reports that “A total of 48 deaths among competitors have been recorded since the rally began. Spectators have also been injured and killed either by competitors or their support vehicles.” In any case, the South American version has claimed its first victim: French motorcyclist Pascal Terry. The Canberra Times reports: “”Officially the result of the autopsy revealed that the French pilot Terry died of pulmonary edema… which produced cardio-respiratory failure,” Julio Acosta, chief of the department of operations of the La Pampa province police, said.” No word– yet– on any “spectator” ksi’s.

By on January 9, 2009

As the city of Fairfax prepares next week to become the first in Virginia to resume the use of red light cameras, the history of a county intersection offers an important lesson regarding the area’s first experiment with photo ticketing. Of the thirteen intersections where red light cameras were used in Fairfax County, only the intersection Route 50/Lee-Jackson Highway and Fair Ridge Drive reported a significant accident reduction, according to figures provided in a 2007 report by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) (see page 75). It is also a location where the length of the yellow signal was both shortened and lengthened, providing a rare glimpse into the real world effects of each change.

(Read More…)

By on January 9, 2009

60 Minutes nearly killed Audi in North America. After “Unintended Acceleration in the Audi 5000” aired in 1986, Audi sales dropped from 74k sales a year in 1986 to less than 12k by 1991. Sales remained constant until 1996, when Audi debuted a car that would finally tackle the BMW 3-series and the Mercedes C-Class […]

By on January 9, 2009

From: GM Dealership Employee Discount <GM_Dealership_Employee_Discount@email.generalmotors.bfi0.com>
Subject: A remarkable loyalty offer for GM owners
To: XXXXX@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 6:19 PM

Loyalty works both ways.
To show how much we appreciate your continued business, we’re offering this special purchase opportunity — exclusively to our best customers:

Up to $3,000 Owner Loyalty Bonus Cash1 on almost every new GM vehicle now through February 2, 2009. You can combine your Owner Loyalty Bonus Cash with your GM Dealership Employee Discount2 and most current incentives, including special GMAC financing on select vehicles. So, if you or someone in your household owns or leases a 1999 or newer model year GM vehicle, now’s the perfect time to buy.

See the attached flyer to learn some surprising facts about today’s GM vehicles and for a full listing of the many models that are eligible for this offer.

To learn more, log on to gmded.com.

Don’t delay.
Hurry in to your GM Dealer before February 2, 2009, to take advantage of your Owner Loyalty Bonus Cash. Remember, this special offer can be combined with your dealership employee discount2 and most current incentives, including special GMAC financing on select vehicles.

By on January 9, 2009

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. WAS is being filed from Beijing this week, from Berlin next week.

Volkswagen makes its million in China: When Winfried Vahland, VW’s honcho in China, stuck to his guns and a 1m sales target months ago, people rolled their eyes. Well, he made it, Automobilwoche (sub) reports. VW sold 844,491 units in China, Audi contributed119,598, newcomer Skoda sold 59,284 – a total of 1,023,373 units. Growth for 2008 was 12.5 percent, above market trend. With this result, and the slight plus in the home market, VW could be the overall winner for 2008.

Audi sells a million worldwide: Audi defied gravity, motor malaise, and assorted other ailments, and closed out the year 2008 with a plus of 4.1 percent worldwide, for a total of 1,003,400 four-ringed units sold throughout the world. In Asia/Pacific, Audi sold 15.6 percent more for the year. Outlook for 2009 is even better, because in the disastrous December 2008, Audi sold 17.4 percent more than in the same month a year before.

SAIC lets Ssangyong fail: Ssangyong Motor Co. has filed for court receivership after if had failed to secure necessary funds to continue operations, the Nikkei (sub) reports. Ssangyong Motor is 51.3 percent owned by China’s SAIC. They only wanted to help if the unions would make significant concessions. Now they may have to. Ssangyong Motor’s board Friday called on management and the company’s union to closely cooperate on voluntary retirement, paid leave, wage cuts and a halt to certain benefits. Commenting on the filing, Ssangyong union spokesman Choi Hyung-gil said: “The decision is very disappointing. We will discuss how to react.”

(Read More…)

By on January 9, 2009

GM has responded to yesterday’s story “revealing” that no one wants to buy the Saab brand. The fact that the denial is off the record [via AFP] tells you that either A) The General is involved in delicate, top-secret negotiation to transfer ownership of the Swedish near-luxury brand to a third party or B) they’re lying. The off-the-record comment from “one GM official familiar with the proceedings” smacks of B: “It’s still early in the process. It’s going to take some time.” Which is the one thing– well one of many things– that GM doesn’t have. Meanwhile, Chrysler is also involved in a smoke and mirrors campaign as part of its ongoing and increasingly incredible effort to convince the world that it’s an ongoing and credible commercial enterprise. Ahead of the don’t call it the Detroit Auto Show, Chrysler product development chief Frank Klegon is talking-up the possibility of building a car-based lifestyle truck. It’s a fiction so boneheaded that even The Detroit News was impolite enough to mention that GM had just abandoned said genre (G8 ST RIP), and that Honda’s Ridgeline is a flop. In fact, scribe Alisa Priddle does a yeoman’s job proving that Klegon is lost in space. “This is a segment where many automakers have recognized there isn’t enough volume for all of the players to invest in their own platform, and there is a lot of sharing going on.” And that’s as good as it gets…

(Read More…)

By on January 9, 2009

By on January 8, 2009

GM has placed HUMMER and Saab under “strategic review.” Which is a fancy way of saying if they could afford to kill them, they would. But thanks to 50 states’ worth of dealer-lovin’ franchise laws and a pile of cash that looks a lot like an asteroid impact crater, they can’t. So they’d like to sell them. But thanks to a global auto industry meltdown– worldwide production is well below 50 percent of capacity– they can’t. So… nothing. Well, your tax dollars hard at work. And soon, Sweden’s. Meanwhile, Automotive News [AN, sub] is confirming common sense, quoting sources familiar with people who know someone who may or may not be involved with the sale but since there isn’t going to be one do we really need to Deep Throat this thing oh what the Hell. To their credit, AN got the HUMMER-Saab-Cadillac channel’s spinmeister to reveal the corporation’s plans for their zombies, now that U.S. taxpayers have a direct stake in their fortunes. Just kidding. “Joanne Krell, a spokeswoman for GM’s Hummer-Saab-Cadillac sales channel, declined to discuss efforts to sell Saab. ‘We are not commenting on the details of the strategic review,’ she said. ‘As soon as we have some details to report, we will.'” As for Ford’s Volvo, everyone and their mother told The Blue Oval Boyz to sell the brand even before the crash of ’07. When Alan Mulally took the reins from Billy Ford, the ex-Boeing exec said no ‘friggin’ way. By the time he admitted to yes way, he couldn’t even get ten-foot poll marks on the brand [see: above]. It’s got to the point where Volvo’s grounded their press fleet. HUMMER, Saab, Volvo, Buick, Saturn, Pontiac, Mercury, Lincoln, GMC– can’t live with ’em, can’t live with ’em.

By on January 8, 2009

The Detroit News reveals that page 60 of the Loan and Security Agreement between GM and the U.S. Treasury Department commits GM and Chrysler to a Catch-22. “They would be in default of federal short-term loans if the United Auto Workers [UAW] or another union engaged in a strike or work stoppage.” At the same time, the loan agreement requires GM and Chrysler to bring their labor costs in line with the transplants’ (by February 17 no less). So the UAW is carrying the football; they can nuke GM’s call on the public purse simply by striking. “I can’t see that a strike would serve any benefit right now,” analyst Aaron Bragman of IHS Global Insight told the News. “It sounds like maybe some Republican union-busting language got in there, which would not surprise me.” And it sounds to me like Aaron, and perhaps the Treasury Department, got it exactly backwards. Will the UAW strike GM? No, but they could. And when it comes to negotiations, potential power is as real as it gets.

By on January 8, 2009

I’ve been watching the Hispanic-flavored “Operation Repo” series on truTV. All I can say is, man, obesity sucks. And if you need proof that carmakers have been selling too much car to too little brain, here it is. (Sweet G37 BTW.) For months, I’ve been telling my MSM contacts that repos are so bad that the collection agencies can’t keep up. In some cases, banks are not calling the repo man– to avoid the cost of recycling the cars and taking the hit to their bottom line. In other words, the headline figure above– representing a mere 12 percent rise of repos over 2007’s stat– could well be the tip of the iceberg. Tom Webb disagrees. Speaking with Automotive News [sub], the economist for auction giant Manheim says the worst is over. “[Repos] will certainly be up in first half of this year, and with the labor market deteriorating so substantially, it might be up quite a bit and might offset the decline I expect in the second half of the year. We won’t have a 12 percent increase, but I would expect something in terms of less than a 5 percent increase.” So “only” 1,753,500 repos for ’09, then. Even if that’s true, with new vehicles flooding the market, and used vehicles flooding the market, and repo vehicles flooding the market, prices are headed down. And if prices are headed down, residuals are in the crapper. And if everyone’s backwards on their existing loans, they’re not going to trade in for a new vehicle. You see where this is going? Nowhere.

By on January 8, 2009

Yesterday we posed the question, “Which uber sedan would you buy?” And while the responses were (predictably) great, they were all over the map. And that’s OK, as I couldn’t even decide on a car in the question. Though in fairness, I think I’d have to go with the Pontiac G8 GXP. It’s got all the power and the right color collar for my druthers. But you know… a Phaeton may also be the car for me. But today we’re talking convertibles. Well, not just regular convertibles (sorry Sebring), but SUPER CONVERTIBLES! Though I’m sure one of you is going to say that his Toyota Solara is the best damn convertible ever and that’s fine. We’re just not going to listen. Are there rules? Like, would a Corvette Convertible qualify as super? Can it go 0-60 mph in 4.3 seconds? Yes? Than yes, it’s super. What about a Lexus SC430? No, that’s not super. Why? Because I say so. Not sure if the droptop you have in mind qualifies? I’ll let you know. Moving on — uber-vert would I choose? Hmmm. Well, the first car that pops to mind is a DB9 Volante (that’s rich person talk for “no roof”). But… no. I said uber! Right, so that has to mean that I mean the Mercedes-McLaren SLR 722 Speedster. No top, no windscreen, 650 hp and 200+ mph top speed. That’s mega double uber, right? But then I’d be that guy. The guy that bought a McMerc SLR with no windshield for half a million dollars. So, no. Oh, I got it — and really the only correct answer. And that answer is a Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 Spider. Yup that’s the one… as long as you don’t mention the Murcielago Convertible. Crap, this is hard. But definitely a Lambo. I think. You?

By on January 8, 2009

You can sort of understand why Nissan decided to pull out of the Detroit Auto Show, er North American International Auto Show. For carmakers, these are the worst of times and the worst of times. But The New York Times reports that Nissan went on to strong-arm their Detroit area dealers into staying home as well. The locals had come up with a plan to staff a Nissan show presence on their own dime. Corporate’s stated reason for weaseling-out back of NAIAS in November: they had “no major new products to show.” And furthermore “the current economic conditions will impact the shows’ marketing effectiveness.” Nissan used those same reasons to back out of the Chicago Auto Show. But wait, it gets stranger. Nissan spokesdude Brian Bockman said that Chicago is back on after corporate “worked with our Chicago-area dealers and came up with a good creative solution that we could maintain a presence while still having an eye toward the challenging market out there.” One function of these regional auto shows: get potential customers out looking at the goods and falling in love. In fact, Nissan’s Detroit area dealers are pretty chapped about missing the shot at their traditional post auto show sales up-tick. The question is: why it is great for the Chicago dealers to put on a presence, but not OK for Detroit’s already challenged Nissan dealers to do the same? Could it be that Nissan corporate a stick it to all things Detroit agenda? Does Chicago’s home town status for the new President-elect have something to do with this? Damn strange. Any Nissan insiders care to share the real story?

By on January 8, 2009

To: [Delphi] Kokomo Site Employees
From: Mike Moran, Facility Manager, Kokomo Operations
Subject: Modification of Housekeeping Services to Improve Kokomo Site
Competitiveness

Modification of Housekeeping Services to Improve Kokomo Site Competitiveness
January 8, 2009

After detailed efforts to analyze and confront the housekeeping costs at the
Kokomo site, local management and the UAW have jointly established a plan to
significantly improve the site’s competitive position in the area of
custodial service costs. The resulting plan establishes a smaller group of
housekeeping personnel focused on core activities. Cost savings will be
immediate and will be achieved through productivity improvements and
reduction in the housekeeping work load.

The following elements are key components of the operating plan that will
affect all employees as soon as Monday, January 12:

* Consistent with the closure of Plant 9, Plant 10 and ITC, and in line with
the site population, several restrooms will be closed. Notices will be
placed on the doors of the restrooms that will be closed and the locations
for alternate options will be posted

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber