By on March 18, 2009

We knew, but we still weren’t ready for this.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

22 Comments on “The Challengerdämmerung...”


  • avatar
    Areitu

    Is that the concept car?

  • avatar

    I saw this on autoblog yesterday and I still can’t believe they are trashing it like that. I know that you can’t sell it because of the legalities of it not being street legal, but surely there are better options.

  • avatar
    puppyknuckles

    Oh my goodness.

  • avatar
    segfault

    They could have sold it at Barrett-Jackson, just like GM did with their preproduction junk vehicles.

  • avatar
    Seth L

    That’s just disrespectful.
    Ford has whole museum of their concepts and one-offs. I can’t imagine how bad the engineers and assembly line guys feel.

    Could Chryco get even more dead-to-me?

  • avatar
    Samuel L. Bronkowitz

    A couple of blogs are reporting that Mopar Performance has stepped in to rescue the car and give it the serious tuner treatment.

  • avatar

    At least give that bad boy to Obama after you get your bailout billions, Chrysler.

  • avatar
    rohman

    Allegorical.

  • avatar
    peoplewatching04

    Is it at all worthwhile to point out that Chrysler is disposing of this vehicle by having it towed away by a Ford?

  • avatar
    Stingray

    @Samuel L. Bronkowitz

    Tuner treatment is very bloody serious indeed…

    I vote for 50HP NAAAAAAWWWWWWZZZ stickers to start.

  • avatar
    windswords

    Look again, it’s a Ram. Anyway, Autoblog said it wasn’t scrapped. It can never be street legal.

  • avatar
    ajla

    Is it at all worthwhile to point out that Chrysler is disposing of this vehicle by having it towed away by a Ford?

    That’s a Ram. The wheel style and long badge behind the front tire give it away.

  • avatar
    Pig_Iron

    Mules, prototypes, and pre-production vehicles are considered “non-salable” an so are customarily destructive tested, or scrapped. Yes, it’s a shame sometimes.

    The PT prototypes had better fit-up than the production machine. Production constraints don’t allow for a lot fine work, so no disrespect to the plant.

    Sometimes scrapping is the right thing to do, like 1st gen Sebring convertible prototype I drove. It was beautiful to look at, but it handled like a rubber raft – no exaggeration.

  • avatar

    STOP THAT TRUCK !!!!

    (Chrysler finally solved the LX line’s rear visibility problems)

  • avatar
    matthewsimmons

    That is a depressing site to see.

  • avatar
    pleiter

    Interestingly, if you Google 8A150014 you get nothing but a few Chinese hits; no image hits.

  • avatar
    James2

    Yeah, what about putting it in some kind of museum? Maybe Cerberus doesn’t want to ante the $$$ it would take to maintain it.

  • avatar
    Accords

    This picture was first at Jalopnik and people over there were raving..

    Heck I was foaming at the mouth…

    But autoblog isnt as good as jalopnik, and TTAC trumps then both.. with an actual explanation.

    I think..
    This might just make it. And Im sure there are a coupla hundred tho mules running around with these bodies.

    But our leader FARAGO could probably tell us what the story is on this beauty.

  • avatar
    NickR

    If that driver is smart he will divert that car to somewhere secret and ‘reveal’ it in a few years. The regular Challenger, not sure how much it will appreciate…but a one of one convertible?

    BTW, that’s not Sublime.

  • avatar
    Greg Locock

    “That’s just disrespectful. Ford has whole museum of their concepts and one-offs. I can’t imagine how bad the engineers and assembly line guys feel.”

    Concept cars aren’t built on the assembly line. They are usually put together by the Styling Studio, or else subbed out to a prototyping shop. Either way the parent companies engineers rarely feel much connection to concept cars, they are pretty things to amuse the journalists and teenagers, and have little bearing on the real product (cough, Volt, cough).

  • avatar
    Edmond Dantes

    Some of you may have seen this on Autoblog, but you didn’t read the comments. It’s not being scrapped.

  • avatar
    NickR

    Funny how times change. I remember a few years back readig a Mopar mag about a guy restoring a ’70 (I think) Roadrunner serial 000001. It was the car used in the ads and press shoots (using lens filters to change the colour from white to yellow in some instances). When all was said and done, it was sold to the general public. Imagine the dumb-ass lawsuits now?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber