By on April 10, 2009

As budget deficits continue to soar at all levels of New York government, the state legislature on Tuesday approved a package of bills to provide relief through the use of red light cameras. The package of six bills extends new authority to use red light cameras to Buffalo, Nassau County, Rochester, Suffolk County and Yonkers. The legislature also gave the nod to New York City’s long-held desire to increase by half the number of automated ticketing machines already installed.

Each project is called a “demonstration program” that will produce detailed reports on an annual basis until the program expiration date of 2014. New York City began its demonstration project in 1994 and has never yet produced this report as required by law. Moreover, the city conceals the locations of cameras and allows no independent study of the effects on traffic safety.

The proposed expansions were approved in the state Assembly by a margin of around 100 to 35 and were adopted by the State Senate by a margin of about 54-8. The bills’ passage was made possible when state Assembly Transportation Committee Chairman, David Gantt (D-Rochester), converted from camera opponent to promoter of red light cameras.

This conversion happened last year after Sensys Traffic, a Swedish company interested in breaking into the US traffic camera market through the Albany firm CMA Consulting Services, paid $80,000 to Gantt’s former legislative counsel, Robert Scott Gaddy. The Buffalo News exposed the link after noticing that Gantt introduced legislation specifically designed to force local jurisdictions to use the technology offered by the client of his former employee.

Although Gantt’s legislation is now technology-neutral, it opens the door for Sensys to bid for the lucrative red light camera contracts throughout the state. After procedural approval in the state Assembly, the bills will become law with the signature of Governor David Paterson (D), an enthusiastic supporter of photo ticketing.

Independent studies of the use of red light cameras show that the devices tend to create an increase in the total number of injuries and accidents (view studies). On the other hand, New York City has cleared more than $75 million in net profit on its program. The text of the New York City and Rochester bills is available in a 100K PDF file at the source link below.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “New York Legislature Approves Massive Traffic Camera Expansion...”


  • avatar
    ZoomZoom

    This may be the perfect time for me to go back to school, get a law degree, pass the bar, and become an ambulance chaser.

    I’d actually enjoy going after state and local governemnts on behalf of my injured or greiving clients.

  • avatar
    GS650G

    Is this a surprise? In a state where taxes are not just raised but invented out of thin air?

  • avatar
    Lokki

    Well, New Yorkers – YOU VOTED for ’em…

  • avatar
    bluecon

    A free fall in state taxes so they need to find money some elseware.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123923448796803135.html

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    I never trust people who look over their glasses like that. I don’t know why. Maybe it’s that Sen. Levin guy that started it. They are going for some wise, intimidating authority image, but all I see is lying, cheating bastard whenever they do it.

  • avatar
    tedward

    Too pissed to comment appropriately. Why wasn’t a gj convened for the obvious quid pro quo?

    Has anyone tried to place a FOIA request concerning the NYC camera locations, yellow light durations and other associated info? I’ll look into it if there wasn’t a post I missed on that topic.

  • avatar
    menno

    “All for the safety of the public. Nothing to do with revenue generation whatsoever. Trust us.”

    -The New Yawk State Levelizers/Legislature (aka ‘legalized’ thieves)

  • avatar
    tedward

    November 3rd. I like Bloomberg but this should be a cancer on his re-election bid.

  • avatar

    The NYC bill has been re authorized about four times. Each time the “report” is put off, and the “demonstration project” continued.

    This was a compromise….there are no speed cams authorized, and they do have their advocates.

  • avatar
    rochskier

    This is exactly like the NYS Thruway toll booths that were only there “…until the state has paid off the debt…”.

    Yeah, right.

    Tell me another one.

  • avatar
    AlmightyPants

    Both my state Senator and Assemblywoman voted in favor of this trash. I was sure to give both of their offices phone calls as soon as I read the news in the paper this week. I know the state is deep in the red, but making dangerous intersections MORE dangerous by way of red light cameras is an awful idea. People are going to get seriously hurt and even die due to these cameras. It’s a damn shame.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber