By on April 18, 2009

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

32 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture: Say Halo to My Little Friend Edition...”


  • avatar
    cpu

    1) Its got road sprayed tar on the bed.

    2) Its not parked in my driveway.

    cpu

  • avatar
    imag

    The oversized logo.

    The color.

    Other than that, it’s the coolest stock truck I think I’ve ever seen. Wouldn’t get one, but I respect the vehicle and owners who actually use it.

  • avatar
    AdamYYZ

    I saw this at the Toronto Auto Show, and I absolutely loved it. It fits my super-car criteria:

    1) Is overpriced
    2) Is not practical
    3) Is well engineered
    4) Is designed with child-like imagination
    5) I cant have it.

  • avatar
    paris-dakar

    I think the Grille is tacky. Like the Skid Plate, Flares and Ride Height. A more conventional Grille with some Driving Lights would be much more appropriate.

  • avatar
    Bimmer

    Other then color, I like it. Grill looks better then stock Grille. And it looks like Ford’s slogan ‘Built Ford tough’.

  • avatar

    I’m not usually given to appreciating these types of things – wildly impractical, poseur-mobiles. However, ding-dang, I’d get one if I had a couple million dollars. I know it was made for the Baja, but I reckon I could romp through some MN winters in that bad boy and have some good fun doing it.

    Now if they’ll only get to engineering a Ford Fiesta SVT Raptor that still gets 35+ mpg highway, they’ll have stolen my heart altogether.

  • avatar
    kkt

    The bed isn’t long enough. A pickup bed needs to be long enough to haul stuff. That looks like it would take a dufflebag and that’s about it.

  • avatar
    paris-dakar

    Now if they’ll only get to engineering a Ford Fiesta SVT Raptor that still gets 35+ mpg highway, they’ll have stolen my heart altogether.

    Ford sells a sweet Focus ST down in Mexico.

  • avatar
    "scarey"

    Is it the new…er…I mean…cancelled F-100 ?
    I give up. Looks very hot to me.

  • avatar
    ConspicuousLurker

    I guess the fact that the logo is matte and not chrome makes it ‘understated’ and ‘tasteful.’ :)

  • avatar
    don1967

    It is actually a 2010 Chery “Foro”, which is based on a photoshopped 2001 Mazda B4000. You can tell by the partial door handle on the front fender. But Congress will never notice.

  • avatar
    Blue387

    Well, they did something to the three-bar grille.

  • avatar
    paris-dakar

    I guess the fact that the logo is matte and not chrome makes it ‘understated’ and ‘tasteful.’ :)

    Matte? It looks like Mold In Color ABS with a Sandstone grain.

  • avatar
    Shogun

    If that is what Mr. Farago calls “small”, then his “big”…. must be ginormous. Really ginormous.

  • avatar
    ConejoZing

    Well… uh. That’s like one of the best sport trucks I’ve seen in ages. Uhm, is something wrong with it?? Perhaps the oversized lettering?

  • avatar
    skor

    I hate the color, it’s not orange enough. Check this F150 Lobo. Now that’s what I call orange.

    http://www.alsacorp.com/products/stylin/showcase/LOBO_F150/DSC01789_L.jpg

  • avatar

    My guess is that Ford will sell every Raptor they can build.

  • avatar

    I saw it in person at the auto show when it was in town. I hate to say it but I loved everything about it from the grille to the 80s style bed graphics, this thing is a big win.

  • avatar

    Got to check it out at the Houston Livestock show and Rodeo, and I can imagine this truck will sell pretty well. I reckon, even in this economy, a wild and crazy American super truck will sell in enough numbers to justify its existence.

    Ford needs to dump the SVT name, though. Or they need to kill off the SHO and anything with Shelby related. Too many hi-po brands and not enough justification for some of them: there’s a reason why BMW’s M series stands on its own two feet.

  • avatar
    P71_CrownVic

    What’s wrong with that picture??? Where to start.

    1. Horribly ugly. Even worse than the Focus, new F-150, and new Superduty combined.

    2. It can only tow 6K pounds.

    3. It has the anemic, boat anchor 5.4.

    4. It is about as practical as a hand with no fingers.

    5. It looks like it was attacked by a JC Whitney catalog.

    6. It is missing it’s mullet-wearing, tobacco chewing, haven’t showered in a week red neck owner.

  • avatar
    ajla

    The G8 ST would have been cooler.

  • avatar
    Kristjan Ambroz

    I’m usually not a fan but I have to say I really think it’s supremely fit for purpose for inner London use – the Brits for some reason decided that having speedbumps of various varieties every 20 metres is the way ahead. This has the suspension and track width to drive over most of them without noticing – making driving in London much more fun :)

    Many of the speedbumps, namely, do not run the whole width of the road but are just wide enough to catch out most cars on UK roads, while something of the width of the F150, if well positioned does not touch the speed bump at all. The SVT Raptor makes sure the ones that cannot be avoided are not much of an issue, either ;)

  • avatar
    jamie1

    I think this thing rocks. Absolutely do not care about tow capacity (buy the stock one with best in class towing if that matters), love the styling, love the color, am not interested in practicality (!!!), sounds amazing when it fires up, looks like it came out of a film set not a catalogue and will be driven by seriously cool, rich playboys with nothing better to do than tool around the desert.
    Overall, a sure-fire hot hit!
    Ford are on such a roll!!

  • avatar
    shaker

    The lettering in the grille should be mirrored to increase the “intimidation factor” at stop lights.

  • avatar
    Nicholas Weaver

    Its an attention grabbing halo truck that does NOT cost ford an arm-and-a-leg to tool up for, since although it would cost a fortune to build one as a modification of an F-150, its very easy to build as a modification to the F-150 on the line, as there is almost no new tooling.

    So if it sell, cool. If it just attract attention to the regular F-150? Cool.

    Flippin brilliant.

  • avatar
    davey49

    It’s awesome, the off road Shelby GT.
    “1. Horribly ugly. Even worse than the Focus, new F-150, and new Superduty combined.”
    The F150 and SD are gorgeous

    “2. It can only tow 6K pounds.”
    Desert trailer tow racing might be pretty cool, they’ll have to do something about it.

    “3. It has the anemic, boat anchor 5.4.”
    There’s a 6.2 coming.

    “5. It looks like it was attacked by a JC Whitney catalog.”
    Why do you think it’s so awesome?

  • avatar
    obbop

    Plastic add-ons around fenders are traps for dirt, mud, water, salt where it is used, etc.

    How long until the rust starts there.

    The same add-ons vibrate against the paint, rubbing through until corrosion inhibitors are worn away. Result, faster rusting.

    Last…..

    It’s built by Chevy. Why does it proclaim “Ford.”

    Something strange going on here.

    Unable to determine if the decal of Calvin washing down a Dodge is present upon the rear window.

    And, you just know, it likely takes hours to access under the dash unlike the era of “real” pick-ups when manly men able to turn a wrench shoved their heads underneath the accessible dash to repair any problems arising there.

    Today’s wimpified faux males must prefer pretty over function, I suppose.

    I must be a minority. Gimme’ the old-style interior where plastic did not make access to innards so hard to attain.

    Well, actually no surprise today’s wimpy wimp trucks are designed for emasculated males since the incessant indoctrination / brainwashing via the politically correct mob has been so successful in altering the pioneer spirit of yore into today’s faux male class that seems to be the norm.

    Ask a Marine Corps drill instructor who is nearing the end of his 30-year enlistment of the differences betwixt males of an earlier era and the precious snowflake tender dainty males so many (but not all) today’s males have devolved into.

    Grrrrrrrr………

  • avatar
    Dr. No

    Great looking truck. Of course, Aztek owners might disagree…

  • avatar
    P71_CrownVic

    Absolutely do not care about tow capacity (buy the stock one with best in class towing if that matters)

    Only ONE of the 56 possible F-150 combinations can tow what Ford supposedly says the F-150 can tow.

    And you MUST buy it with the heavy duty payload and towing package, which includes a stronger frame.

    The other 55 combinations have equal or worse towing and payload than the competitors.

  • avatar
    russification

    car is angled to the left, is copper in tone, has poor graphics on the rear.

    four wheels, your wrong? your strong? i give up….

    how bout that grill though

  • avatar
    bodyonframe

    Yeah, I think I would like a more conventional blue oval grill, but otherwise this is the most complete off road truck in a while (Power Wagon, ZR2? I’m sure I’m missing a few). The 6.2 should help it’s speed issues and probably increase the cost as well. Not that I can afford one as it is.

  • avatar
    Gunit

    I love it, and I usually only like old trucks.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber