By on May 6, 2009

Toxicroach: “Only thing today was the identities of the [nine] non-TARP bondholders, and I’m a few hours behind the curve on that (download pdf here). As far as I can tell, [non-TARPies attorney] Uzzi thus far hasn’t filed any exhibits to prove Chrysler is worth more than the $2 billion. Uzzi still has a chance to object, so it might be coming up soon. And not a moment too soon.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

6 Comments on “Today’s Chrysler Court Docs: Non-TARPies Revealed...”


  • avatar
    lw

    OMG.. THIS IS GREAT!

    http://www.theonion.com/content/video/autoworkers_compete_to_keep_jobs?utm_source=b-section

    Here is who we should be doing things… Everyone that gets a bailout becomes a reality show!

  • avatar
    NBK-Boston

    As far as I can tell [non-TARPies attorney] Uzzi far hasn’t filed any exhibits to prove Chrysler is worth more than the $2 billion.

    And that really is the crux of the matter.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    “Uzzi far hasn’t filed any exhibits to prove Chrysler is worth more than the $2 billion.”

    Good luck with that!

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    If only they had failed 10 years ago, I could have gotten them $10B by simply putting out a confusing press release about plans to expand the company using the internet.

    Oh well, timing is everything.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    “As far as I can tell [non-TARPies attorney] Uzzi far hasn’t filed any exhibits to prove Chrysler is worth more than the $2 billion.”

    I should think that the burden of proof would lie with the proponent. How can anyone reach a value opinion without due diligence, which the opponents attorneys and experts have not been in position to perform. Isn’t that reason to hold full hearings, after discovery?

  • avatar
    AnalogKid

    I should think that the burden of proof would lie with the proponent.

    Sorry, that’s incorrect.

    How can anyone reach a value opinion without due diligence, which the opponents attorneys and experts have not been in position to perform.

    Do you really think that the non-TARP bondholders failed to obtain a value opinion prior to purchasing Chrysler debt?

    Both sides have their own ideas of what it’s all worth. The question is, who’s right? The fact that no evidence has yet been offered to dispute Chrysler’s valuation is telling, no?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber