You may recall that GM’s Marketing Maven spent forty-minutes or so “crapping” on GM’s current ads before jetting off to Montserrat. After sipping a Piña Colada and walking in the rain, Lutz returned to assure GM’s nervous ad agencies that the status remains quo. (Quel surprise!) Automotive News [sub] reports that the former Car Czar “has no immediate plans to review or fire the automaker’s advertising agencies even though he publicly criticized a recent Buick ad campaign.” Apparently, Maximum Bob declined to specify a deadline for the mad men to get their shit together. But he “acknowledged GM needs to move fast — within the next three to six months — to improve the public’s perception after it spent 39 days in federal bankruptcy protection.” Now why they’d have to go and mention that? Jeez. Anyway, three to six months is a pretty big window from which Leo Burnett and friends will not get defenestrated. And boy, do we have some primo Lutzisms after the jump.
If after strong senior management direction, the agency, for some reason, repeatedly fails to come up with a product where the customer says, “Yes! That’s exactly what I want” and fails to move the needle, then obviously you start reviewing the agency, Lutz said.
Exactly! Accountability is like tomorrow (or a frustrated male porn star/car reviewer): it never comes.
I will always give existing agencies a chance because as one agency head once told me in my career, “The way the American automobile companies deal with agencies is almost a system that prevents brilliant advertising,” Lutz said.
Almost? Whew! Dodge a bullet there, eh?
“I don’t want happy employees on the screen saying how much they enjoyed building the car,” Lutz says. “I want an interesting ad that’s memorable. I want people to have a positively changed perception after viewing the ad.”
Beats the hell out of those negatively changed perceptions.
Lutz is critical of the marketing and advertising process used by many large corporations — a process that he believes actually hinders creativity.
“It’s much like a sausage machine. Many people at the operating level check to make sure this message is here and ‘let’s not forget this piece and let’s not do that because this may offend this group of people,'” Lutz said.
So by the time senior management see a proposed ad, Lutz said it becomes “this highly sanitized product that is often devoid of any risk or breakthrough capability.”
Yeah! Those big corporations suck.
Your TTAC takeaway: Bob Lutz doesn’t “do” irony. And yet, and yet, the best part of this welcome addition to the Lutz oeuvre is actually the AN picture caption: “Lutz: Not afraid of making changes.”

RF is a frustrated male porn star? That goes a long way towards explaining his car reviews… Seems like putting a verbal loose cannon like Lutz in charge of the corporate message is a risk – entertaining, but risky!
Hmmm, what I get from Lutz’s statements is that we won’t soon see any of those Infiniti-type “water and rocks” ads, but we may see GM co-opt (and probably fumble) in some way the (in)famous Dodge “urinal” Super-Bowl add…
If after strong senior management direction…
So by the time senior management see a proposed ad…
These are the very steps that not just “hinder creativity” but kill it. And every hot-dog remark Lutz makes in public compounds the problem by de-motivating employees.
If Lutz wants creative ads , he should keep himself, Fritz, and the VPs completely out of the process.
If after strong senior management direction, the agency, for some reason, repeatedly fails to come up with a product where the customer says, “Yes! That’s exactly what I want” and fails to move the needle, then obviously you start reviewing the agency, Lutz said.
I thought the car companies were supposed to come up with a product that people want, not the ad agency. I guess I’ve had this wrong all along…
Gah! I see them in my nightmares.