Find Reviews by Make:
Yes, several 2009 Dodge products are more desirable than a pair of socks. Unless of course they’re really nice socks.
22 Comments on “Socks Please!...”
Read all comments
Yes, several 2009 Dodge products are more desirable than a pair of socks. Unless of course they’re really nice socks.
There really is nothing left in the tank over there, is there?
sox would last longer
1) The voice actor they use plays a serial killer on tv. You want your brand associated with a serial killer? Really?
2) I just rented a Dodge Avenger for 10 days. Drove like an early 90s sedan, engine clicked like a broken clock, and for a guy who is 5’8″, I could not get in and out without contorting my neck.
Awful all around.
Dexter endorses Dodge! I suppose you’d need a spacious boot to put all those bodies in there. Plus if you get leather seats, they’d wipe clean easily for all those blood stains.
So what are the two red stripes on the flag? Is that some new Dodge-not-a-Ram logo? Blech.
I have to admit it. I like the new “Dodge” branding with the two red stripes. One, it builds on the same basic font Dodge has used for the last 25 years so there’s a measure of marketing economy plus a heritage benefit. Two, it looks sporty — just the image they’re going for. But how long can Chrysler survive giving $1000 rebates away on their “best” cars?
BORING! Seriously, put something in there to keep your attention. They lost me after about three seconds.
I’d rather have sox.
I agree with Rod. Socks make a lovely holiday gift, and they now cost the same as a 2009 Dodge.
The lights are still on in Auburn Hills, but clearly no one’s home.
That was….just….pathetic.
Absolutely pathetic.
Wow.
Another horrible Chrysler spot. By God, they’re on a roll! How was this travesty approved? Why did they think that creepy VO actor was a good choice?
If you’ve ever opened up an Italian magazine, you’ll see what sells cars (or anything else). Naked women! Fiat, get on this.
Great, now I’ve got to go google image “Italian Car Ads.” ;)
Now I want to go and buy some socks.
Fiatsler should hire this guy to be in charge of advertising for Dodge:
Memo to Sergio: you need a new ad agency. Unless, er, that was a product of a new ad agency. In which case you need a new NEW ad agency.
P.S. I’m not up on my naval flags, but might that not be an “SOS” blowing in the wind?
W-o-w. Talk about aiming low. At least they got the right mood going by hiring a tired, depressed-sounding VO.
A pair of quality Thorlos socks:$14.00 A Dodge caravan:$28,000. Both are unsalable after 3 years, and worth virtually nothing. Sad.
Dear Dodge, Ram or whatever the @#$%$ your name is, enough with the lame-o re-branding powerpoints masquerading as TV spots, enough with the idiotic Jeep ads, enough of the deadly dull car and pickup ads; dump this agency and ask someone in the mailroom or a building custodian to write your copy for you they might actually have an original idea.
Anyone who seriously says they’d prefer a pair of socks over a Charger R/T, clearly has never driven a Charger R/T
Roberto,
No one is serious about socks over a Charger R/T. I’ve driven one, and it’s a blast. It’s just that the execution of Dodge marketing is so awful and self-destructive it’s hard not to satirize it — especially when commercials like that are made with our money!
That I understand. Thanks.
As much as my MANCARD says I so need to take a drive in one..
It couldnt be anything BUT the Daytona version. Wont be with the 2.7
It has to be the Charger DAYTONA in LIME GREEN.
But paying 35g+ for a Charger… thats a little ridiculous. Scratch that, paying any real money for a Chrysler is ridiculous.
Then again..
Wondering whats better, a pair of socks or a Chrysler is better..
Socks win everytime.