Find Reviews by Make:
Latest Car Reviews view all
Latest Product Reviews view all
Recent Comments
- Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
- theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
- A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
- Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
- Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...
Car Reviews By Make view all
New Car Research
Who We Are
- Tim Healey
Managing Editor - Matt Posky
News and Social Media Contributor - Timothy Cain
Sales Analyst - Murilee Martin
Junkyard Finds Author - Matthew Guy
Contributor - Chris Tonn
Contributor
- Adam Tonge
- Bozi Tatarevic
- Corey Lewis
- Jo Borras
- Mark Baruth
- Ronnie Schreiber
Radar proof? I’m guessing if you can afford the car, you can afford the points.
Cars will probably never be Radar Proof. You need radar absorbant paint as well as radar reflecting angles to pull thatoff. Those wheels would EASILY make that car radar visible. You’d have to cover em up.
the f-117a nighthawk is long retired
That’s what they want you to think
No, the Nighthawk is long gone. Wasn’t stealthy enough for modern Soviet radar systems. Hell, the Serbs knocked one down, and damaged others.
The real question is what has replaced it. I mean, those trillions of missing defense dollars went somewhere.
I think I’ll paint my Alfa GTV-6 matte black… Same effect kinda!?!
Looks like what Batman would drive.
Also reminds me a bit of this.
http://www.uncrate.com/men/cars/exotic/lamborghini-reventon/
I’ll take mine in lime green with white wheels please.
What! it only comes in black? Never mind then.
is that Hank Reardon behind the wheel?
That’s a slick promo pick.
The car should be flat black though (contrary to an earlier post, no it isn’t: it’s shiny compared to the F-117… or the Lambo Reventon for that matter. Actually the Reventon would have looked better in this pic.)
The license plate will give it the proper RADAR signature …
In reality, the plane is about 5 times the size of the car. Just peep the pilot’s head size in the picture.
I don’t think all that cladding is going to make it go faster. Maybe one of those big wings from a tuner Civic Si?
Unless those facets actually defeat radar (don’t hold your breath), that car is a ridiculous abomination. All form before function, and the form is very questionable. It looks like it was designed by a 10 year old, or possibly homer simpson or batman.
Or Homer Simpson _AS_ Batman.
Guess I’m the only one here that thinks it’s hot. Yes, it’d be a quick joke in 5 years (delorean anyone?) but for now, hot.
Yes, I did want to be batman when I grew up.
That’s good of you.
It took me awhile to admit to myself that I really like the Lamborghini Reventon. The adult in me thought it absolutely ridiculous, esp considering its 1Million Euro price for the same mechanical package as a Murcielago… but… let that 14-year old boy speak up, mix in the fact that only 20 are built ever, and add in that one-of-a-kind interior, and I LOVE IT.
We never had this conversation.
BTW, I also think Batman would have gone for the Reventon instead of this thing.
http://tinyurl.com/yjmkgpb
http://tinyurl.com/yh8lnby
Slavche, Darth Vader called, he wants his car back.