By on December 14, 2009

The 599-based P540 Superfast Aperta

As Ferrari leaves its traditional elegance aside in favor of expeditions to the limits of geek-gauche, few efforts by the Modena firm are as dismaying as its Special Projects one-offs. Jimmy Glickenhaus’s million-dollar Enzo-upgrade, the Pininfarina P4/5 set the pattern: one-off Ferraris must clearly signal that their owners have far more money than taste. Following in that bold tradition is this, the P540 Superfast Aperta, based on the 599 GTB. Though it looks like the buyer, Edward Walson, simply asked for a gold, targa-topped 599 with 250 GTO styling cues, the Aperta was actually inspired by the gold Fezza from Fellini’s Toby Dammit. Not that the pedigree keeps the Aperta from looking like a 1970s oil-sheik special. And considering this dismal re-working does such disservice to Ferrari’s best-looking car (plus the targa-top adds 50 lbs), it’s hard to see why they were so certain the project was “in keeping with the brand’s ideals,” as Autocar puts it. On the plus side, Walson gets the 540’s tooling to ensure uniqueness. Here’s hoping it stays as “unique” as it is “special.”.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

18 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture: Putting The “Special” In Special Projects Edition...”


  • avatar

    When I saw the photo, I was certain it was a Dodge Viper with a kit-car fascia. Jesus H God what a monstrosity.

  • avatar
    panzerfaust

    Back in the 70’s there were all sorts of awful attempts at making Corvettes look something like a Ferrari.  Now we have Ferrari’s being made to look like 70’s Vettes.  

  • avatar
    porschespeed

     it’s hard to see why they were so certain the project was “in keeping with the brand’s ideals,” as Autocar puts it.

     Giving people with more money than taste what they want at an exhorbitant profit. I fail to see how this could possibly be divergent from the brand’s ideals.
    Fugly? Sure. You outta see some of the crap that Porsche does.

  • avatar
    Bunter1

    The styling cues are not so much 250 GTO as 275 GTB/4 to my eye.

    Actually, though I’m not big on retro, but aside from the color I rather like it.

  • avatar
    midelectric

    I look forward to seeing this on bringatrailer.com in twenty years.

  • avatar
    jkross22

    It’s a CorLotarri.  Why in crap brown?

  • avatar
    mtymsi

    It does look the most like a 68-73 Vette. Hate both of the two tone colors but then again some people have all their taste in their mouths and in this case more money than brains.

  • avatar
    Boff

    I, for one, thought the Glickenhaus P4/5 was a massive improvement over the execrable Enzo. Anybody with me on this?

    • 0 avatar

      I’m with you. The P4/5 is an epic rebody from start to finish, for a real enthusiast, while this gold contraption is just the result of a rich guy w/too much money & no taste. The Enzo & F50 were not at all attractive, though the Enzo has quite a presence.

    • 0 avatar
      chuckR

      +1 on the P4/P5. Love it. It has curves.
      The gold thing in the picture? Nope. Don’t like gold and don’t like the shape, the details, the wheels, don’t like anything I can see in the picture. Even the grass in the background is kinda scraggy.
       

    • 0 avatar
      James2

      The Enzo is not execrable, imo. It’s not 308GTS-pretty, certainly, but it’s clearly a case of aerodynamics –as well as literally linking the road cars to the Scuderia’s– overruling anything Pininfarina might have suggested.

    • 0 avatar
      bunkie

      Absolutely. That was the car Ferrari should have made.

  • avatar
    FreedMike

    C’mon, guys, it ain’t THAT bad…

    • 0 avatar
      Ingvar

      Oh yes, it is. Good design is coherent. The Italians are master at that, especially the fluidity and clarity of line. What makes the 250 GTO so beautiful is that it seems to be carved out of solid muscle. It “fits”, and it flexes doing so. This car has no coherence anywhere, it seems to be designed by not two but three different persons not working together. There’s a front, a middle, and an end, and nothing fits together. Contemporary Ferrari front end, Chevrolet Corvette middle section, and the rear end from a Ferrari 275 GTB/4. The design doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t hold up together, it’s not a coherent “whole”. It looks like what a two-person Californian coachbuilder would make out of a Corvette and some glassfibre-mouldings.

  • avatar
    exnilo

    Front: Callaway Corvette
    Back: 67 and later Corvette

  • avatar
    Morea

    It is strange that working for the same corporation as Maserati and Alfa Romeo (who make some of the most beautiful berlinettas) Ferrari produces some of the ugliest designs.

    Is it because the horsepower wars have reached a zenith (at some 600+) so to compete you must do so on avant style alone?

  • avatar
    mikenem

    I like it, from this angle anyway.  Red would look best though

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber