By on August 24, 2010

Kobi writes:

I need a car for under $15,000, manual trans, RWD or non-transverse/non-haldex all wheel drive. I hate transverse/fwd. I hate automatics. I have owned a Nissan SE-R, Acura Integra, Honda Prelude and now I have a last generation Toyota MR-Spyder that I don’t want to abuse during the winter again. I got a last generation Isuzu Trooper for my wife, little baby and dogs — but she complains about the mileage. So I want to get a winter-ish car that I’ll enjoy too, that is safe (!) for the baby, and has room for two dogs. This car is in addition to the MR and the Trooper.

I like reliability, I like convertibles as well – love the sun. If the Toyota Solara convertible were rwd or longitudinal awd with a manual tranny that would be my dream car. If Toyota made a 5-series like station wagon with RWD – that would be a close second. I like reliability. I love cars, but it pisses me off to have to throw parts at something.

I have been thinking 05 Legacy GT wagon – big sunroof. A little scared about the first model year jinx, and some (although few) reports of reliability/expensive repairs. Or maybe go really, really budget and see if I can find an unabused Legend or Integra GSR sedan? I’ve made a list – having already ruled out BMW for the nonsense with maintenance that I can’t suffer.

IS300

Pro: Toyota, RWD, manual yes

Con: everywhere, wagon auto only- swap from sedan, small interior

G35 Sedan

Pro: RWD, manual yes, high hp

Con: everywhere, cheap interior, ugly 1st generation body

Acura TSX

Pro: manual yes, Honda engine, nice interior, like a big Prelude?

Con: transverse fwd

Infiniti M45, 2003-2004

Pro: classic shape, relatively rare, v8, high hp, RWD

Con: auto only – possibly swap likely difficult

Sajeev answers:

The Infiniti M45 has a classic shape?  That’s gotta be a first in the history of the Internet. Anyway, I don’t see you hating transverse powertrains, considering all the wrong-wheel drive cars you’ve owned. And the ones you’re considering.  And as far as BMW nonsense in the reliability department, I see Subarus being just as troublesome. And maybe even harder to diagnose and repair for multiple reasons.

Get over transverse powertrains, or get a used Mustang GT droptop driven by an older, somewhat hoon-averse, person. Oh wait, you want safety, so kiss your droptop dreams goodbye!  Judging by your current and past vehicles, you like cheap and cheerful: none of the cars on your list fit the bill.  Why consider snobby, near luxury cars? I’d recommend a Honda Civic or Mazda 3. Even better, their zippier versions at the top of the range: the Si and the MazdaSpeed.

Steve Answers:

You have a terminal case of the What-if’s. In the corporate world we call it paralysis by analysis, but the big point is this. You’re just gazing at your navel for way too long and creating friction out of fiction. Haldex AWD systems are fine these days. Transverse powertrains are fine. Heck, just getting FWD and a good set of snow tires is absolutely fine.

I can’t recommend a car because you simply have the automotive preferences of Cybil. You want a Solara? Fine, drive one. You want a Subaru Legacy wagon? They are insanely overpriced (as are the Toyondas and BMW’s you mentioned). But if that’s what floats your boat so be it. The only real direction I can give you is… don’t be a snob. The prior owner of the vehicle is going to have a much greater impact on your long-term satisfaction than the corporate emblem on the hood. I just don’t know any wagons with convertible tops, AWD, and a stickshift for $15k.

The Toyota MR-S you drive will likely outlast whatever your desire du jour is. I would just get it some good snow tires. A detail. Catch up on the maintenance… and drive the wheels off of it. For $15k you can enjoy some amazing vacations and still drive a great car when you get back from leisureland.

Need help with a car buying conundrum? Email your particulars to mehta@ttac.com, and let TTAC’s collective wisdom make the decision easier… or possibly much, much harder.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

73 Comments on “New Or Used?: The 15K Wonder Car Edition...”


  • avatar
    ash78

    Jeep Wrangler 4-door

    Convertible
    Easy to drive/maneuver
    Fairly reliable and simple
    Kid/dog-proof
    She’s coming from a Trooper, so it’ll drive like a sports car ;)
    (and if she had a Trooper, a major downsizing could be culture shock for her)
    Very good value retention in later years

    EDIT: Have these been on the market long enough to hit $15K? If not, it’s gotta be close…

  • avatar
    gsnfan

    If you already have a fun car, why not get a Mazda 5 with a stick? Sure, they’re FWD, but they are more fun than a minivan. They are great for kids (sliding door and 3 rows of seats) and get mileage in the low to mid 20s.

    • 0 avatar
      Russycle

      I agree, the 5 is a fun ride for what it is and practical. You have the Toy when you want to hoon, so why get get another RWD convertible? Figure out what you really want from this third car, then narrow down your choices.

  • avatar
    Quentin

    My brother drives an 05 Outback XT and my best friend drives an 05 LGT sedan. Both vehicles are quite reliable and I would definitely recommend them. Good luck finding a 5MT LGT wagon, though. I had originally looked for one when I sold my GTI but they are all modded or high mileage.

    Why not an Impreza WRX wagon/hatch w/ stick? If you look hard enough, you’ll find an unmolested model. If you aren’t looking for something particularly sporty, a Forester or non-turbo Legacy wagon is pretty easy to find. The IS300 is a good option, but just plan on getting the sedan. I’m a hatch/wagon guy like you, but finding a Sport Cross is near impossible and you’d have to drive an auto.

    I’m in a similar situation just opposite. I am looking for something fun, RWD, reliable, and under $15k. So far I’ve driven an 08 Miata MX-5 Sport 6MT (great handling) and an 06 Honda S2000 (OMG, what an engine!) If I can be patient, I’ll wait until next year when the Toyota FT-86 (FR-S) comes out, though. No need to buy a car and turn around and resell it when I can’t resist the FR-S.

  • avatar
    itsgotvtakyo

    GS-R! GS-R! GS-R! Inexpensive, reliable, tons of quality modifications to improve the driving experience if that’s your thing and it will depreciate less than anything else on your list. You’ll have a harder time finding a four door but the good news is that they’re not quite as popular with the “tuner scene” and, as a result, your chances of finding a virgin are better than they are with the 3dr variant. Good luck.

    • 0 avatar
      Areitu

      How are GS-Rs on insurance rates relative to other sport compacts in it’s class? I’ve tinkered with the idea of picking one up.

    • 0 avatar
      itsgotvtakyo

      I’m 26, have two other cars on the policy, have collision on all three and fire/theft on the Civic and Integra and have had a clean record for the past five years. The Integra works out to about 140/mo but I have provisions in the policy protecting the extensive modifications. Depending on the car you bought and the coverage you chose I can’t imagine it would be more than what I’m paying, assuming you have a relatively clean record. Probably quite a bit less if you opt for standard coverage.

  • avatar
    Educator(of teachers)Dan

    I have seen some old, non-modified Subaru wagons with low miles, but they’re almost all from very snowy areas of the country and were driven by little old ladies who wanted the 4speed auto. Sorry. If you look really high and low you MIGHT find a base Impreza wagon from the first generation or so that fits the bill. That’s a big MIGHT.

    If you could get over your FWD averse-ness I’d suggest looking for a stick shift V6 Mazda6 hatch or wagon. I know, pretty dang rare, but seek and ye shall find.

  • avatar
    mountainman_66

    a winterish car? where do you live? New York City, Montana or the UP of Michigan. It makes a difference. What kind of dogs? Paris Hilton tea cups or English Mastiffs? You want a “safe” car….well its 2010, so even 7 year old used cars are relativley safe, given their respective weights and girth. You have a young child and made mention of a transmission swap on an Infiniti M35….? Are you made of money? The 3 or 4 grand that a PROFESSIONAL swap might cost would be better served spent on your kid’s education or something else more meaningful. Your post is all over the place. Its easy to day dream and “what if” , and if its only a paper exercise thats fine…but to really expect to find what you want in the real world for 15k is a bit much.

  • avatar
    RGS920

    “I just don’t know any wagons with convertible tops, AWD, and a stickshift for $15k.”

    Awsome.

  • avatar
    forraymond

    Thank you for making this feature a regular item on your site. The responses that I got were quite helpful. I hope other readers will take advantage of your knowledge.

  • avatar
    dwford

    I’ll bite:

    Cadillac CTS-V – RWD, stick, big V8
    Dodge Magnum AWD – no stick, but good in snow

  • avatar
    lawmonkey

    Nissan is pushing the, shall we say, “quirky” Murano convertible in the next model year or two. Save the transmission, you might be the target audience. Start saving, in a few years this beauty could be yours…

  • avatar
    ajla

    I’d say screw the manual transmission and get the ’03-’04 M45. I love those things.

    Assuming you won’t accept that, and even though you don’t seem too into domestic cars, I’d take a look at the first-gen Cadillac CTS 3.6L.

    There is also a manual-transmission Lincoln LS V6, but good looking finding one of those.

  • avatar
    EChid

    Two things to point out:

    In terms of safety? The Trooper is one of the most unsafe vehicles you could put your kids in. Consumer Reports found them to be one of the most at risk vehicles for flipping.

    In terms of winterish? RWD is aweful in winter. Period. AWD or FWD.

    And I repeat, get your kids out of that Trooper, please.

    • 0 avatar
      Charles T

      Correction: RWD is only as awful as the tires of the car. From personal experience, a heavy overpowered RWD car can tame a Boston winter if it has the right tires. How about an Infiniti FX35? It’s a bit tall for a dog and not quite as roomy as a wagon, but it’s RWD and longitudinal, and also available in AWD. Also, if you really must have a manual, it shares a platform with the G35, so you can go bankrupt tilting at that windmill.

    • 0 avatar
      mcs

      From personal experience, a heavy overpowered RWD car can tame a Boston winter if it has the right tires

      +1 Actually, in some parts of Boston RWD has an advantage. I live in a hilly area and some of them are steep enough to cause most of the vehicles weight to shift the rear. On a front wheel drive you lose traction really quick. On a RWD it just digs in more.

      I have a couple of FWD cars with Blizzaks, if the steeper approach to my neighborhood hasn’t been plowed and sanded, I have to make a 5 mile detour. On the other hand, my BMWs have no problem climbing the same hill under the same conditions.

    • 0 avatar
      Gardiner Westbound

      I live in the snow belt.

      In my experience a rear wheel drive (RWD) car with heavy lug snow tires on the rear is excellent in deep, wet snow especially on hilly roads. Only 4WD or AWD with winter tires, Blizzaks in my case, is superior.

      I also have a front wheel drive car with top of the line Yokohama winter tires on all four wheels. It’s good on ice, but three inches of wet snow will bog it down.

  • avatar
    twotone

    What about Audi? Want a sedan — get a A4/S4. Want a convertible — get a TT. Want a wagon — get an Avant. Or, Subaru WRX, or Mitsubishi Evo. I’ve lived in Colorado for 34 years and have driven RWD BMWs for most of that time. I always have four real winter tires mounted on extra rims and change over when there is actual snow on the ground (don’t run winter tires on dry pavement). Personally, I’d go for something fun to drive (e.g. Miata) and the cheapest POS AWD for winter (Subaru, RAV4, CRV, Kia Sorento, etc.) driving.

    Twotone

  • avatar
    Cole Trickle

    Yeah, I am going to say rob a bank and get the ctsv wagon. Makes more sense than any if those tranny swaps.

  • avatar
    SV

    First thing that came to my mind after reading the first sentence of your letter was the Lexus IS300. It’s a great car, essentially a Japanese copy of the E36 3-series (and just as good except with peerless reliability). While a manual trans shouldn’t be hard to come across, the wagon will be near-impossible to find; they’re absurdly rare. The first-gen G is good too, roomier, but the reliability record isn’t quite as spotless (still good though) and from what I understand it doesn’t handle as well as the Lexus. Either one would be a good choice.

    I think an 05 or 06 Legacy wagon might be the best bet practicality-wise, and Subaru reliability leaves little to be desired (first-year problems shouldn’t be an issue). Personally I would just nix the Trooper and spend a little extra on a newer, lower-mileage Legacy or Outback.

  • avatar
    NulloModo

    You say you had FWD cars with transverse engines, but three of the cars you mentioned that you’ve previously purchased are all FWD with transverse engines, were they all that bad?

    If you want a RWD convertible with a stick and good reliability for under $15K, go with a Mustang convertible. With the top down you can put four moderate sized or less adults in one (though keep it limited to shorter trips for the back seat passengers), they have good safety scores, are reliable (plus parts are prentiful and cheap if you do need something done), and have tons of aftermarket upgrade potential if you crave more speed.

    You should be able to find a ’05 – ’07 Mustang Convertible under your price range, depending on miles, V6 vs GT and equipment.

    • 0 avatar
      SherbornSean

      NulloModo,
      It really is time you had your own column here, no?

    • 0 avatar
      mikey

      @ NulloModo.. I know its off topic, but gott’a I ask ya. Is there such a thing as a V8 non GT, Mustang convert? While were here,what is a”Pony Package”?

    • 0 avatar
      itsgotvtakyo

      @mikey
      1)no
      2)available on v6 mustangs, fog lights in a “corraled” mustang grill, 17″ rims, suspension tweaks, some badges, tape stripe and, if memory serves, some years got ABS and traction control included, others did not.

    • 0 avatar
      Educator(of teachers)Dan

      Depending on the generation of Mustang were talking about there were LX 5.0s that were not GTs and there was a “GT delete” package that would remove the spoiler and GT badges. So it sort of comes down to, what makes a “GT” a “GT?” Personally I’d love all the go fast goodies with none of the flash.

    • 0 avatar
      NulloModo

      Ack, I should proof-read my posts. That first sentence should have read “You say you hate FWD cars…”

      Mikey – itsgotavtakyo pretty much answered it all, but yeah, GT = V8 for any recent Mustang. As for the Pony package, it has meant different things during different model years, but for the most part, it’s an appearance package with some extra equipment. For 2011 for example it gives you 18″ polished wheels, pony side badges, different floor mats with pony graphics, automatic headlights, a different grill, foglights, a rear spoiler, and an optional lower tape stripe. I’d say it’s worth it overall, it usually doesn’t cost much and it dresses up the car pretty nicely. As far back as I can remember, the Pony Package is V6 only.

      A quick way to tell what you are dealing with in many modern Mustangs is the badging – for the current and previous body styles at least, if it has a Pony badge on the front fender, it’s a V6. If it has a GT or 5.0 badge, it’s a V8, if it has no badge, it is likely a V6, but it could also be a Bullitt or other special edition that came factory debadged. Up until this current year the V6 models didn’t come standard with dual exhaust, although there may have been a package that added it here or there. There are so many different special editions and variants of the Mustang it can be hard to keep it all straight, although as a last resort you can always pop the hood.

      EDIT:

      Dan – heh, sort of a post flurry and things overlapped. The ’08 and ’09 Bullitt edition might be what you are looking for. It came from the factory with cold air intake, 3.73 gears, strut tower brace, H pipe exhaust with bigger tips and glass packs, retuned suspension and brakes, and removed the majority of the factory badging. It had a custom ‘Bullitt’ trunklid badge, but nothing on the sides, and a blacked out grill.

    • 0 avatar
      itsgotvtakyo

      Dan is correct if we’re going back to fox bodies. I was assuming mikey was referring to the 05+ car, which I believe is the only gen that offered a v6 pony package but correct me if I’m wrong. What gen was the GT delete option available on? I know there was a GT spoiler delete option available for the 05+ car but it left the badges, and the rest of the car, unchanged. It’s been three years since I was in the business and the minutiae started to fade the second I walked out.

    • 0 avatar
      Educator(of teachers)Dan

      Dang I thought the GT delete did more than get rid of the spoiler, although I guess the right adhesive remover would do that. But that would be dishonest, like getting an Impala SS and removing all the SS clues to make it look like Grandma’s grocery getter, sneaking up on ricers and blowing their doors off. Thank goodness I’m far too honest to ever think of doing anything like that. (fingers crossed)

    • 0 avatar
      Revver

      Winter. Car.

      I’ve conducted Closed-Course tests and have verified that if you even whisper the word “snow” at a passing Mustang, it will leap off the road and find the nearest ditch.

      True story.

    • 0 avatar
      mikey

      Thanks for the info guys…I envy “Kobi”. Keeping three cars on the road is beyond my financial means.

      Personally, I like the gently used Mustang drop top idea. As far as winter goes, four steelies/four good winter tires,and some winter driving skills,will get you through.

  • avatar
    pleiter

    1st gen. Solara (99-01). Qualitatively, a surprising number had the 3.0 V-6 with a 5-speed manny tranny, it seems like Toyota was trying to make amends for discontinuing the Supra. Scads available used 2 years ago. No doubt way below the budget, hence prime winter beater material. 1MZ-FE is common up through 06 since you seem to like swaps, you could swap the miles off the engine. FWD=winter beater unless you like to drive backwards like ‘Mater.

  • avatar
    SherbornSean

    I’m sorry to be the one to have to tell you this, but its time to grow up. You already have your car, plus a winter beater in the trooper for when your precious is too special to go out in the cold.

    It’s time to man-up and buy a vehicle for your wife and kid. She’s not the one who wants a turbo, RWD, manual coupe — you are, and it’s time to let that go.

    You seem confused between whether you want snobby or dependable. So I’ll give you 2 choices to help you get started. If you want snobby, look at a 5 year old Volvo XC70 with about 60K miles on the clock. It will take good care of your family for the next decade, just be sure to change the transmission fluid (right, Steve?)

    If you want dependable, look at a 3 year old CR-V with the new design. The EX-L model has leather and you can probably get a CPO one in a color the little woman likes.

    Sorry to be so cold. PS: If you are planning on more than 2 kids, you might as well get the minivan now. Either way, you’ll learn to appreciate those Sunday drives in May and October in the MR-S.

    • 0 avatar

      Wow. Thanks.

      I listed the cars I’ve had and others I like as information to motivate suggestions.

      In statistics we call it inference.

      Apparently some of you don’t actually drive. Then you’d know that a 21 year old 4runner (my last car) can be more fun to drive than 10 year old Prelude. I realize that Honda makes a fantastic product – witness the S2000 and NSX when liberated from the fwd transverse platforms they’ve perfected.

      As for the Trooper: my wife actually knows how to drive. Looking for a rwd large inexpensive reliable (mine had a replacement (gm I know) V6 at 90k) *manual transmission* suv? I was – I found the Trooper and enjoy it for what it is.

      Also – no I’m not rich. I’m just lucky enough to still be working (thanks america) and I really, really love cars.

      And for those gentle souls who actually gave me some useful information: for sure I hadn’t though of the CTS-V until someone reminded me – good call; thanks for the info on subarus – I just don’t know their product well.

      Thanks TTAC. Remember – let jalopnik be jalopnik (no dis I like Jalopnik but wouldn’t ask that forum a serious question): down with fanbois, up with information.

    • 0 avatar
      itsgotvtakyo

      “Apparently some of you don’t actually drive. Then you’d know that a 21 year old 4runner (my last car) can be more fun to drive than 10 year old Prelude.”

      Dude your enthusiast stock just took a dump. You’re on the receiving end of a lot of great advice from some very knowledgeable people and you say something like this? Apparently you don’t actually drive if you honestly believe this. Having owned both a 4runner (great truck if you ignore the popped head gasket) and a Prelude SH (one of, if not the best handling fwd car in the world) I can call shenanigans.

  • avatar
    th009

    A convertible RWD/AWD winter car with a manual gearbox, and room for a baby seat and two dogs?

    Uh huh.

  • avatar
    TokyoPlumber

    Given that Kobi already has an Isuzu Trooper he probably doesn’t want another SUV. That said, a 2007 Suzuki Grand Vitara would meet all his requirements:

    – less than $15,000
    – longitudinal 2.7L V6
    – 5 speed manual transmission available
    – rear wheel drive or all wheel drive versions available
    – safe for the baby and plenty of room for the dogs
    – good reliability record (2007 is the second year for the Mark II Grand Vitara)

    Although the Grand Vitara is an SUV it will get better fuel economy than the Trooper (ie, much better on the highway and somewhat better in the city). The Suzuki, however, does not have the cachet or sportiness of the IS300, GS35, M45 or TSX. Typically, though, when you are buying to budget and have very specific criteria you’re going to have to make some compromise.

  • avatar
    obbop

    “my wife, little baby and dogs”

    A perfect candidate for the demographic you have been forced into, even though you may be dragged into it screaming and writhing with your fingernails digging into your past life……..

    appears to be time for a mini-van-type conveyance.

    And it is something you can reside in if the economy continues its relentless slide into oblivion and the ruling class attains their oligarchy.

  • avatar
    itsgotvtakyo

    Although it’s very dependent on your proximity to a Suzuki dealer, checking out an SX4 Crossover might not be a waste of time. AWD with a stick, good fuel economy for an AWD vehicle and encouraging reliability reports from True Delta. The styling doesn’t do anything for me but there’s a lot of functional space for such a small vehicle and you’re getting 2010 safety features and a very strong new car warranty for very close to what you’re thinking about spending on a used car. It’s not the most inspired driver’s car but it gets less credit than it deserves. A friend bought one as a cheap four season commuter and has been fairly happy with it. Resale is absolutely atrocious so plan on driving it into the ground but other than that it might be worth a thought.

  • avatar
    Areitu

    Sounds like you’re looking for a used Audi cabriolet.

    But it’s not a wagon, sooo….

  • avatar
    jmo

    Sanjeev and Steve,

    God – you’re both morons. He obviously wants a TTAC Unicorn! The 300bhp, 1.8L V-6 diesel, rwd, 6MT, pather based, Ford Mondeo SVT, 4-door wagon cabriolet that they sell new for $12,995 and you can get CPO off lease for 6,995.

    • 0 avatar
      PeriSoft

      Ok, so, I’m curious about this. You say you want safe – with a !, no less – but then demand a non-transverse engine and many other things. So which is it? The safest used car for the money is probably a Saab, with the newest-gen platforms well within your price range. A same vintage volvo is as safe but is more money; same with a brand new Camry, say. But the safest car you can get for your money won’t have your laundry list of other priorities.

      So, which is it? You compromise on safety to get your non-transverse engine… Something happens and your baby’s hurt or worse; do you say, “maybe it was the car, but at least it’s the right drivetrain”?

      I don’t get it. It’s your child. You care about safety, you get the safest car you can get. You’re not just living for you anympre.

    • 0 avatar
      PeriSoft

      Above to the original questioner, obviously. And this after a re-read: you care about safety at all and you put your kid in a freaking isuzu trooper? What the hell is wrong with you? Are you deluded, or ignorant, or just that selfish?… I can’t even conceive of how you can have the foresight to understand that safety is an issue with cars and then put your baby in an old, ill-handling, badly built poster child for automotive recklessness. Yikes.

    • 0 avatar
      NulloModo

      To his credit, the Isuzu Trooper isn’t nearly as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Yes, it may be a bit tippy, as all tall boxy SUVs can be, but that can be almost entirely mitigated by how it is driven.

      The biggest cause of SUV rollovers is sudden and severe turning one direction and then the next with no time for the vehicle to balance in between. If you know the vehicle’s tendencies and can keep your head in an emergency situation a Trooper isn’t an inherently unsafe vehicle.

    • 0 avatar
      jaje

      Tippy is an understatement. Trust me – after having students in defensive driving clinics (which I volunteer at) bring in their narrow wheelbase SUVs (Bronco II, Explorer 2 door Sport, Trooper, etc.) Getting one of those up on two wheels is frightening (others have had them flip / roll). B/c of this SCCA and Tire Rack now ban these vehicles from their safety clinics – just too dangerous to make any sudden turns > 45mph.

      I do agree with the advice to let it settle – it takes a well trained driver to settle them when they get tippy at high speeds – and in that emergency situation you will not have that space or time to settle the car from the initial sudden turn.

  • avatar
    Toyondai92

    LEGEND! LEGEND! LEGEND! Put a RL’s C35 with the Legend’s C32 Type II cams to alleviate the BHG issues, and do the swap to a six-speed GS sedan. Good to go. Or…

    Buy an old Crown Victoria Police Interceptor for $500. Rebuild the motor for some power (blower?) and bolt a Cobra’s T-56 behind it. Repaint it and put a Marauder/LX Sport interior in it. You now have an ultra-safe and ultra-reliable sedan that will burn its tires all day long, and at the end of the day hold your entire family and ten bodies in the trunk. Or you could just start with a Marauder and put up with the automatic.

  • avatar
    J Walter Weatherman

    Second generation Nissan Xterra:

    -RWD/4WD
    -available 6MT
    -powerful V6 (265 hp, 285 ft-lbs)
    -reliable
    -under $15,000 for a non-abused 3-4 year old model
    -fits the wife, kid and dogs
    -simple, easy-to-clean interior good for kid and dogs
    -safe

    Sell the Trooper, get the wife the Xterra (that he can still have fun driving occasionally), and still have $ left over for a convertible that does not have so many compromises…

    • 0 avatar
      rehposolihp

      You know, I think you are onto something Weatherman…. except you did it wrong and chose the wrong vehicle accordingly.

      Sell the wife, baby and dogs, buy a BMW M coupe convertible.

      Problems solved right?

      Oh – and move somewhere not cold.

  • avatar

    Maybe an old Toyota Cressida wagon from the mid 80s with a Supra 5spd gearbox swap plus a set of snow tires :)

  • avatar
    Buckshot

    Audi A6 Quattro Avant
    BMW 5-series Touring
    Jaguar X-type Estate
    MB E-series T
    Subaru Legacy Kombi
    VW Passat Variant 4-motion
    Volvo V70 AWD

  • avatar
    bschiek

    Kobi forgot to mention that this vehicle must also pull his 12,000 pound travel trailer and get 30 mpg while doing so…

  • avatar
    stationwagon

    Mercury Grand Marquis, Cheap, RWD, big, reliable. It doesn’t have a manual transmission, but you can deal with it.

  • avatar
    tedward

    “Haldex AWD systems are fine these days.”

    I’ve gotta disagree with this. Mechanically there should be nothing wrong with the Haldex systems on market, but they are setup to be heavily front biased (new 9-5 aside). I guess the rationale is to provide the same handling characteristics of a fwd sedan so as not to ruffle feathers with buyers, but I don’t know any fwd sedan buyers that could positively identify the handling characteristics of a strictly fwd setup. To top it off, they still send power rearwards when the cards are on the table, and on loose surfaces this is very apparent. Predictable and adjustable they are not.

    Now, there are companies that can chip your Haldex. There’s no reason with the torque split shouldn’t be 10/90 instead of 90/10, but it will nuke your warranty if the dealer notices (if they noticed at all they were abusing your car btw). As far as I’m aware there aren’t any reliability downsides to this conversion, but I’ve never done it so I’d welcome correction if this does open up a can of worms.

  • avatar
    jaje

    Saabaru 9-2x Aero (a nicely reskinned WRX Wagon). It will give you the high performance, reliability, and space inside all for a bargain price. However it won’t be comfortable when fully loaded. If you do plan on trips in it – buy a small carrier top type enclosed two wheel trailer to load up. By doing this it leaves ample room in the car for all the passengers to comfortably travel.

    If you really want something with some space inside especially for dogs. Check out the Honda Element. It gets similar mileage as the WRX but with inside space galore and quite flexible and easy to clean out. It is also a great tailgating vehicle with pickup rear end and easy to access doors.

  • avatar
    mazder3

    How about a 90’s Buick Roadmaster wagon? It’s rear wheel drive, has Vista windows and modern engines and trannies are easily swapped. Or you could go the Red Green route and make a full length moonroof using just a storm door and a sawzall.

  • avatar
    italianstallion

    Sell the unsafe Trooper and spend just a little more to get what you want:

    $21K will get you into a Subaru Forester 2.5X Premium 5MT. The sunroof is GIANT. Your convertible 4WD 5MT wagon awaits.

  • avatar
    Mr. Spacely

    I’ll second the XTerra. Also, that this guy needs to grow up.

    I haven’t seen it mentioned yet, but a 2009 or 2010 Ford Escape XLS Manual can be had for 15-16k.

    These have just-barely-passable interiors, but car-like handling for the old lady, decent space for the kid, and they are quite durable.

    Only 178 horses, though.

  • avatar

    He has one convertible, and “loves the sun”, but if this is a “winter car” he doesn’t want a 2nd convertible. What about an older Lexus GS300? Safe, roomy enough, RWD and you might even find a manual version. An older E320 with a stick would work as well, but you’d have a German car out of warranty. Not sure you can find a decent CTS at this price. The reality is this, your desire for RWD and a manual (almost certainly German and high mileage at $16k) is completely at odds with the desire for a reliable, low maintenance car. You know this yourself in considering an old Acura, and the cars you’ve had before. Get the TSX.

    If you could handle an automatic, I’d sell you my Tribeca…I sent in a note in for advice on replacing it. Perhaps I’ll be flogged on these pages as well in days to come.

  • avatar
    rfmac

    I had a 2003 MR2 and would caution you about it. I loved driving the car; it was wonderfully responsive and I never tired of the looks. But the top leaked terribly in the rain and was a challenge to drive in less than ideal conditions. Also, it was not nearly as well made as the 2000 Celica GTS it replaced. (That was an excellent car in every way.)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber