By on September 20, 2010

Having applied for a trademark on the phrase “range anxiety,” GM seemed to have wedded itself to the idea that all-electric cars are fundamentally compromised in their ability to inspire consumers. But with its range-extended Volt costing $8k more than its prime competitor, the Nissan Leaf, GM appears to be backing away from that position as the International Business Times reports that The General will begin testing EV versions of the Chevy Cruze/Daewoo Lacetti Premiere in Korea. According to the report,

The Cruze EV is equipped with a 31-kWh battery that generates maximum power of 150 kW. On specific test schedules conducted by LG Chemicals, the demonstration vehicles may achieve a range of up to 160 km (100 miles).  The vehicles can go from 0 to 100 km/h (60 miles per hour) in 8.2 seconds with a maximum speed of 165 km/h (102.5 miles per hour).

The Cruze EV will be tested as part of a demonstration fleet, so don’t hold out for a Chevrolet EV anytime soon. Reports that GM has “redeemed” itself after “killing the electric car” may yet prove to be premature.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

17 Comments on “GM’s EV-Only Volt-Face...”


  • avatar
    wgmleslie

    Edward, well done.  It’s not often I see a good Latin pun!

  • avatar
    Daanii2

    Having copyrighted the phrase “range anxiety”

    Not copyright. GM applied for a trademark for the phrase. Normally, I would say no way would the USPTO register the trademark. But with Government Motors, who knows.

  • avatar
    gslippy

    The Volt’s primary competitor in the beginning will be the gasoline Cruze, not the Leaf.  An EV Cruze would definitely compete with the Leaf, but it looks to be a couple years late.

    • 0 avatar
      charly

      Volt’s primary competitors will be other $40k cars. The choice of the buyer will be between a Volt and a $40k Volvo or BMW. Not a Cruze

    • 0 avatar
      Bancho

      @charly:
      Are you seriously suggesting that the Volt will be cross shopped against BMW and Volvo? What evidence, price aside, even remotely suggests this?

    • 0 avatar
      charly

      Don’t you think price is an important factor? It is the reason why the Phaeton is out of my list of cars i want to buy and instead i’m looking at a Golf

    • 0 avatar
      Bancho

      @charly:
      No, I disagree and your explanation is flawed. You’re using to wildly differently priced cars to back your argument.
       
      You said you’re looking at a Golf (very nice, I just got my wife a 2010) but you could buy a Chevy Cruze instead. Why aren’t you considering one (hypothetically since it’s not in showrooms yet). If your argument holds water then it should be on your shortlist as well since their prices should be roughly similar.
       
      The Volt will appeal to a specific set of people. It’s not the sort of car you just lump in against similarly priced cars. The people likely to consider it will be looking at the Fisker Karma, Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf and Prius PHEV.

    • 0 avatar
      charly

      The average $40k Volvo buyer isn’t really a likely BMW buyer. A $40k car competes with other $40k cars, no with $20k cars. It is also marketed as a $40k car if you look at the trim. The inside is of a $40k car that tries to look like a $40k car and not a cheap version of a $100k car (that is why it doesn’t have fake wood) or an expensive version of a $20k car
       
       
       
      ps. I’m in Europe. The Golf was more an example of a “middle of the road” car than what is really on my shopping list and the Cruze is out as it has the wrong badge as Chevrolet (korea) says i’m to poor to buy the real thing

  • avatar
    Daanii2

    The Nissan Leaf is nothing special. Just a gasoline car converted to electric. Like thousands of people are already driving, having built their own. Ford will have one soon — an all-electric Ford Focus. Tesla has its electrified Lotus Elise.
     
    Similarly, an electric Chevy Cruze would be easy for GM to build. And would be nothing special.
     
    The Chevy Volt, though, is a new concept. Unlike an electric car, it can replace a gasoline car, not just supplement it. It will be interesting to see how the Volt does in the market.

  • avatar
    GarbageMotorsCo.

    Once again, GM is proving a leader of nothing and a follower of many.

  • avatar
    joeaverage

    It appears that GM may STILL not have their heart into building an electric car. I’ll seriously consider shopping elsewhere if that becomes more clear. 

  • avatar

    Well, in the meantime, AMP Electric Vehicles can convert an Equinox for you, if you have a spare $50,000. Might as well buy a Volt and save the cash.

  • avatar
    GarbageMotorsCo.

    Oh no!

    Range anxiety!!!

  • avatar
    seabrjim

    And, as of Sept. 21 2010, you still cant buy a volt anyway.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber