The Washington state Supreme Court on Friday rejected the motion filed on behalf of a traffic camera company to block a public vote on the use of automated ticketing machines. In a two-sentence order, the court refused to intervene in the scheduled November 2 election in the city of Mukilteo where residents had signed a petition forcing a red light camera and speed camera ban onto the ballot. The denial of a motion for an emergency injunction came a month after the Snohomish County Superior Court also declined to stand between the voters and the ballot box (view decision).
“I think even judges are getting sick and tired of out-of-state camera companies like ATS suing to block the voters from voting,” initiative co-sponsor Tim Eyman told TheNewspaper. “The courts are there to interpret the law after the election, not to stop voters from voting.”
A front group funded by American Traffic Solutions (ATS), the company that had the contract to issue photo tickets in Mukilteo, had filed the lawsuit and the appeal to the high court seeking expedited review. The order signed by Chief Justice Barbara A. Madsen stated that a majority of justices agreed to hear the case “in due course.” Because the ballots must go to print now, the hearing on the case will not occur until after the election.
“The reason we’ve cleared every hurdle put before us in our attempt to let the voters decide on those obnoxious red-light cameras and speed cameras is because the people are totally on our side,” Eyman said. “We have no doubt that the sleazeballs at ATS will pour big money, as they did for this front-group lawsuit, but it’s not gonna do any good.”
Eyman believes the supreme court agreed to hear the case because it wants to lay down a clear precedent allowing voters to have the final say to decide issues on statewide and local initiatives. Since this would be the first time any jurisdiction has voted on banning cameras in the state, Eyman thinks it could have a snowball effect, inspiring other cities to follow with the Washington chapter of the Campaign for Liberty and BanCams organizing the effort.
“What I’m most excited about is the pressure this local vote will have on Olympia — it’s now obvious that unless the legislature reins in this Big Brother, taxation-through-citation scam, the people are gonna do it for them,” Eyman said.
A copy of the order is available in a 30k PDF at the source link below.
Source: MCSG v. Mukilteo (Supreme Court of Washington, 9/10/2010)
[Courtesy:Thenewspaper.com]
It’s too bad they can’t come up with a “change lanes without signaling” camera or a “tailgaiting” camera… I’d be behind that 100%. Speeding and red lights, not so much.
There are tailgating cameras in Germany.
http://www.gettingaroundgermany.info/regeln.shtml
Unfortunately, there are also red light and speed cameras there.
Are the German cameras set up to catch and punish bad driving or are they just gotchas to raise money as in the US?
Yes, there are speed cameras in Germany (and throughout Europe), but from what I saw over there, the speed limits make more sense to begin with. A law that makes sense, is less likely to cause rebellion.
Most motorways in europe have a 130 km/h limit (about 81 mph), most secondary roads are 90 or 100 km/h and that’s on roads that are often narrower and twistier than we have here.
In the world of law, there are always gray areas that are not covered or do not fall into the “spirit” of the law. Police officers, prosecutors, and judges are responsible for delineating those gray areas.
Automated law enforcement takes away the role of a human in determining if the spirit of the law has been violated.
Until perfect laws without unintended consequences are written, automated law enforcement has no place in our society. Since fallible humans write our laws, I doubt such perfect laws will ever be written.
There are some jobs that a computer simply can not do.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/cerabino-traffic-camera-firm-stops-at-nothing-says-902093.html
Editorial on ATS calling CITIZEN VOTE TO BAN RLC “RACIST”!
This scamera vendor DOESN”T WANT A VOTE in BAYTOWN TX or Houston.
ATS claims it is “racist” to have a vote!
Quote: “Bet you never imagined that asking voters whether or not they want red-light surveillance cameras is racist.”
Speeding and red lights, not so much. Most secondary roads are 90 or 100 km/h and that’s on roads that are often narrower and twistier than we have here.
car insurance quotes