By on November 22, 2010

If you love data almost as much as you love cars, you’re in for a real treat. The EPA has issued a report [PDF here] on the last 35 years of light-duty vehicle efficiency trends, and it’s jam-packed full of fun graphs detailing the evolution of America’s car market. For example, the fuel-efficiency record of the major US-market players is laid bare in one particularly compelling collection of graphs (above). More detail on by-manufacturer efficiency over the last three years can be found here. Other fun graphs: production breakdowns by vehicle size and type, a comparison of performance and efficiency by vehicle type, and a distribution of vehicles by weight for 1975, 1988 and 2010 (weights dropped from ’75 to ’88, and are now back to nearly 1975  levels). You can also check out production share by weight to find out that the sub-2,750 lb died sometime after the year 2000. You can even see the breakdown of FWD-RWD-AWD  by vehicle type and pinpoint the moment that Subaru started making an impact on the market. All told, it’s an automotive data-gasm that will leave you a lot better informed about the state of the US market. And the perfect opportunity to make sweeping generalizations about the American car market. Enjoy!

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

5 Comments on “Chart(s) Of The Day: EPA Breaks Down 35 Years Of Automotive Trends...”


  • avatar
    Steinweg

    Does anyone else find it strange that vehicle safety standards have pushed weights up (I know other features have contributed), but that driver licensing has gotten no more rigorous, and you can still drive a motorcycle or an open-topped car on public highways? Does the average vehicle really need to be 4,000 lbs safe? Bring on the carbon fibre, if that’s how it’s got to be, but I never understood why motorcycles are A-OK while thin pillars that enhance outward vision are evil.

    • 0 avatar
      psarhjinian

      I don’t think safety really is responsible, or at least is responsible for the increase in mass.
       
      Weight went up as we were able to make larger cars that still had good mileage and power.  The “natural state” of the North American car is big and heavy, and we’re just returning to that, thanks to engine efficiency.  There are plenty of very safe small cars, but people aren’t buying them now that you can get a big car without having to suffer with a emissions-strangled powerplant.

  • avatar
    SVX pearlie

    Interesting notes on the first graph: Subaru is the only OEM for which the Car & “Truck” mpg ratings are virtually identical.

    Also, fun to remember gas prices over same time period… Fact: cheap gas = lower mpg.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber