By on November 9, 2010

This summer I had the pleasure of touring Volkswagen’s advanced research lab at an industrial park near Stanford University. VW is developing a number of advanced technologies at this Silicon Valley facility, including its autonomous driving systems and electric battery packs. But in one corner of the lab, VW techs have a driving simulator set up with cameras aimed at the driver’s face. Using these cameras, VW developers measure driver attention and focus, testing just how much the latest Google Maps-based navigation system distracts drivers, and whether a car could offer features designed to keep the driver’s attention on the road.

These are doubtless worthy goals, but this ad for the Hyundai Sonata Turbo made me wonder whether VW pays much attention to changes in facial features based on changes in performance. Surely the kick of a turbo at full boost focuses the driver away from the gadgets and gizmos that VW (and every other automaker) is trying to integrate into its vehicles, and reconnects them with the original automotive “killer app”: a compelling driving experience. Technology, it seems, is being used simply to integrate more technology while minimizing distraction. When will car companies start using that technology to assist their vehicles in providing a more engaging, emotionally-rewarding driving experience?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “The Face Of Turbo...”


  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    When will car companies start using that technology to assist their vehicles in providing a more engaging, emotionally-rewarding driving experience?
     
    They already do, and do it often, but you never hear about it because people don’t notice it and, thusly, don’t complain.  It certainly doesn’t garner the kind of ludditie whinging that afflicts every modern car review (and it’s associated commentary!) because people rarely say something nice, but don’t hesitate to complain.
     
    I do a lot of technology rollouts (IT, not automotive) and, generally, a good rollout is one where you hear crickets chirping.  People are inherently conservative, reactionary and change-averse: if you add technology and get no pushback, you’ve done a good job.

    • 0 avatar
      redliner

      I think that improving the driving experience with technology is difficult to do because the automobile, in its most basic form, is a collection of mechanical systems. It’s true that the machine can be improved by using technology to control it more precisely, but to truly improve the driving experience, you have to improve the machine. Adding i-drive doesn’t make the machine more exiting.

  • avatar
    stryker1

    I like how, at the end of that ad, the voice-over says “From Hyundai” like he can’t believe what he’s reading.
    “Really? Hyudai?”

  • avatar
    carguy

    “When will car companies start using that technology to assist their vehicles in providing a more engaging, emotionally-rewarding driving experience?”
     
    Because the majority of consumers clearly don’t rate that high on their list of priorities. Auto enthusiasts are unfortunately a small minority of the car buying population.

  • avatar
    don1967

    “When will car companies start using that technology to assist their vehicles in providing a more engaging, emotionally-rewarding driving experience?”
     
    Is it possible that we are just spoiled?    I mean, we’ve got Toyota Camrys that can pin grandma to the back seat better than the Bandit’s Trans Am ever could, and Dodge Hemis whose blat-blat-blat exhaust note alone could distract Bo Duke away from cousin Daisy.   Heck, even an el-strippo Ford Focus handles like a roller coaster compared to a Ford Mustang of 40 years ago. I’d say we’re doing okay.

  • avatar
    rpn453

    If people wanted “a more engaging, emotionally-rewarding driving experience”, they’d buy more manual transmissions and less Camrys.

  • avatar
    Zykotec

    If you ever get a chance, try test driving a Smart Roadster. I have , once, and allthough it went out of production quite fast (I guess the people who bought it as a design accessory was really let down when it turned out to be a sportscar), it really was a car designed purely for driving pleasure, give or take a few accessories. (it has AC, auto/flappy paddle gearbox power windows and leather, but still weighs only 780 kg’s (around 1600lbs) The only downside of the car is the transmission, but it can be chipped to shift faster. Other than that, Caterham continues to upgrade their cars with new technology all the time, even if their not really street legal in all countries.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber