By on December 18, 2010

This weekend’s homage to the car’s electrification, celebrating deliveries of the Leaf and the Volt to normal civilians, in addition to a whole fleet of electric THINK cars delivered to the State of Indiana, would be incomplete without mentioning that EVs can be a menace to society. These things are so quiet – that they creep up on you – just like that.

To protect society from being unduly menaced,  the U.S. House of Representatives passed S. 841, the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act, which would require the U.S. Department of Transportation to set standards for alert sounds in electric or hybrid vehicles. The U.S. Senate last week unanimously passed the bill, cnet reports. The bill now goes to the White House for approval from President Obama. Who won’t refuse to sign such a honking bill.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

14 Comments on “EVs Get A Big Honking Bill...”


  • avatar
    HerrKaLeun

    I’m sure people will selling parts that make the EV sound like a V8.
    It is a good idea in general. My concern is that pedestrians talk in their cell phone while not looking on the street…. it must be very loud to get today’s pedestrians attention.
    To be hones, when i cross the street i never hear the car close to me, I see it. but today’s IC are so quite that they have to be very close to be audible in normal traffic. With this, every car should have one if one is serious.
     
    But again, besides ears, we have eyes but refuse to use them when crossing a street.

    • 0 avatar
      Steve65

      It’s a stupid idea, and an even stupider law. On par with the (straight faced serious) proposals to pad lampposts and other sidewalk structures to protect mindless cellphone talkers/texters from injury when they carelessly wandered into them.

  • avatar
    Robert.Walter

    I second my earlier nomination for George Jetson sounds…

    • 0 avatar
      Russycle

      Make mine a Star Wars TIE fighter please.  For everyone who thinks this is a stupid bill, spend some time riding a bicycle in a pedestrian infested area.  You’d be amazed how many people will step off the curb right in front of you without so much as glancing up and down the street.  Of course, one could make an argument in favor of culling the herd…

    • 0 avatar
      daga

      I was going to echo the ‘dumb law’ comment, but I agree – TIE fighter sounds would be awesome!

  • avatar
    Daanii2

    Reminds me of the red flag laws more than a hundred years ago. Same kind of thing. Just as stupid.

    • 0 avatar
      charly

      Those red flag laws weren’t stupid. A average automobil on the road wasn’t the horseless carriage we imagine but a locomotive on iron wheels without brakes. To state that the stopping distance was a problem is a vast understatement

  • avatar
    brandloyalty

    Maybe if people start looking before they step into the street, they’ll also stop stepping out in front of cyclists.

  • avatar
    AaronH

    And maybe they can give “free” ice cream to the emotionally weak Amerikans as well.

  • avatar
    mikey

    We, as humans are gifted with a wonderfull pair of eyes. WTF is so hard about using them. I worked around electric, and almost silent lift trucks, driven by guys with an obstructed view.

    Nine out of ten lift accidents, were somebody not using thier god given eyes.

  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    Should be a boon for the clowns that currently sell fake blow-off-valve speaker systems to Civic ricers….
     
    Seriously though, I’ve surprised a few people in car parks with a GS450h.

  • avatar
    Ion

    I’m suprised people are so up in arms about this law being passed. The general idea is so that people who are visualy impared can tell when an EV is coming. Hell, most cross walks around me beep for similar purposes.

    • 0 avatar
      Daanii2

      “I’m suprised people are so up in arms about this law being passed.”

      I’m not opposed to this law because I want to see blind people picked off by passing cars while crossing the road. But at some point you need to weigh the cost against the benefit. In this case there is a large cost in terms of money and unwanted sound balanced against a very speculative benefit.

      Regulations like this don’t help.

    • 0 avatar
      Ion

      The actuall occupants of the car are unlikely to hear the sound ommitted with the windows up due to modern sound deadening and insulation.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber