By on February 17, 2011

Automotive News [sub] reports that Global Vehicles, a firm with a contract to distribute Mahindra pickup trucks in the US, has dropped its lawsuit in US court in an apparent attempt to rescue its distribution deal. The contract between Mahindra and GV called for British arbitration of disputes, and apparently the British arbitration panel required that all claims be handled through it rather than in US courts. The dropped suit would have required Mahindra to press forward with its US launch regardless of pending arbitration. Mahindra, meanwhile, has said it is looking outside of its deal with GV for a US distributor, so it’s not clear if GV’s olive branch will even make a difference.

Meanwhile, Mahindra has not yet commented on the recent 19/21 MPG EPA rating earned by its truck, which has long been hyped as being capable of achieving 30 MPG on diesel fuel. GV’s John Perez says the matter is for the manufacturer to address, but, he tells AN [sub]:

The discrepancy may be a matter of which truck was tested. Mahindra plans to introduce two versions of the truck: a two-door, two-wheel-drive version, and a four-door, four-wheel-drive version. The four-door version with an automatic transmission gets 40 percent worse fuel economy than the two-door, Perez said. Mahindra provided the four-door version to the EPA for the initial fuel economy rating.
In a comment today to Automotive News, Perez maintained that the two-door truck will live up to its promised fuel economy in the 30-mpg range.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “Mahindra Distributor Drops US Lawsuit, Defends 30 MPG Claim...”


  • avatar
    obbop

    Import it but name it “Mothra.”
     
    The obvious advertising tag line would be:
    Floats like a moth but stings akin to a bee.”
    The masses would just HAVE to own one!!!!! Or two.  More?
    The clamor for the critter would assuredly be immense.
    Who says that advertising doesn’t sell.
    Using herd/hordes of scantily-clad bodacious babes would also assist sales.
    Heck, toss one of ’em in the back seat or cargo space, whatever would assure maximum sales!!!!!!!!!
     
    Ain’t capitalism grand?

  • avatar
    GS650G

    22 Inch rims an option?

  • avatar
    Ironghost

    That’s if it ever shows up.

  • avatar

    A Sneak Peak? Someone needs to smack their ad copy writers upside the head.
    Hey, Mahindra: In this context, it’s spelled “peek.” That’s what’s wrong with that picture.

  • avatar
    eggsalad

    The car blogosphere (and I hate that word) needs to get together and send a joint memo to both Mahindra and GV Autos:
     
    Dear sirs:
    We have been following this saga for more years than we can count. Until you have a viable vehicle ACTUALLY FOR SALE IN THE USA, will will not write another post about you.
     
    Seriously, this drama is long stale.

  • avatar
    brettc

    These guys are never going to get their $hit together. So that means that I’m looking at Ford for an updated 1985 diesel Ranger. I can dream.

  • avatar
    indi500fan

    The mileage explanation seems pretty sketchy.
    Hard to imagine that kind of improvement comparing the 2 versions.
    It’s still the same basic powertrain, no?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber