Let’s start with this: Under no circumstances is a Lamborghini Gallardo “just an Audi R8”. The Gallardo was already old hat by the time the R8 arrived, having gone through three model years and one major revision. If anything, the R8 is a Gallardo, not the other way ’round.
Except it isn’t, which is both good and bad.
I’ve driven most variants of the Audi R8, starting from a 4.2 six-speed on the day that I met Murilee Martin for the first time all the way to the V10 Plus S-Tronic during last year’s R&T PCOTY. It would be an understatement to say that I’m fond of the model. There’s so much to admire: the aesthetically satisfying yet completely usable interior design, the superb amount of passengerr space compared to pretty much any other supercar, (including the Gallardo, which has a much lower roof) and the way it combines exotic-car looks with everyday practicality.
I was surprised at how often my single-serving students at the Xtreme Xperience mentioned Tony Stark and “Iron Man” as the reason they’d chosen to drive the R8. I never really thought of it as the “Iron Man” car. Apparently everybody else does. Not that the Audi doesn’t continue to look futuristic in its ninth year on the market. You can argue that it’s better-looking than the Gallardo. It’s certainly more noticeable on the street; through the miracle of fourteen thousand sales and a rather conservative shape, the baby Lamborghini no longer turns many heads.
Most people can comfortably wear a helmet in the R8. It’s not that difficult to park or maneuver at low speeds. The stereo and navigation are Audi-standard. Entry and exit is easier than in, say, a Viper (had to mention it for the sake of the B&B’s self-satisfaction!) and the seating position is also somewhat better than what you get in the Italians or the McLaren. If you had to cross the county in one of our Final Five, you’d take the Audi, no question about it. Even the climate control is luxury-car-spec, as I discovered when testing the original 4.2L cars during a Texas summer.
In isolation, the R8 feels rapid. There’s a brilliant noise from the 8250-rpm 4.2L V8, the R-tronic single-clutch automated manual doesn’t get confused on-track, and the acceleration seems more rapid than the 12.8-second quarter-mile time suggests. The front axle is always working, but it rarely works very hard. In wet conditions, it’s very confidence-inspiring and it can take full throttle in anything short of a full-on rainstorm.
Yet the modest tire size and significant stagger (235 in front, 285 in back) both make it easy to reach the R8 limits on-track and contribute to the Audi’s pace being noticeably lower than that of the other cars in this comparison. More so than any other car I drove that weekend, the R8 offers gentle, progressive, controllable understeer and very little sense of the heavy engine behind you. It’s the Cessna 172 of supercars: slow, stable, easy to get out of trouble. Dropping the tire stagger to 30mm or so, as I’ve done with my Porsche 993, would go a long way towards restoring the natural balance of the chassis, at the expense of predictability.
As the car with the oldest transmission technology in the group, the R8 has the worst automatic mode. For my students, I left the car in manual and shifted it for them. It was simply in the wrong gear at the wrong time otherwise. In manual mode, as noted above, it works fine, as long as your expectations are based on single-clutch hardware. This is not a Ferrari 458, which will handle repeated and random stabbing at brakes and throttle with instantaneous gearcharges perfectly chosen to maximize power or stability depending on one’s twist of the manettino. But it’s a bit better than the F430’s single-clutcher.
If you’re careful with the front tires, the R8 delivers a surprising amount of midcorner speed. It did, however, prove tricky in the turn known at Hallett as “The Bitch”. The Audi was simply more sensitive to low grip there than any of the other cars, likely because of the combination of narrow tires and significant rearward weight distribution of 44/56. (The Gallardo is usually quoted at 43/57 but I’d be surprised if the difference between the cars was a full percentage point.) Still, overall I’d say my students got more out of the R8 than they did out of anything but the GT-R.
So why fifth place? Well, it’s just this: The R8 looks like a supercar but it struggles to stay with V8 M3s and C6 Corvettes around a road course. The weight of 3,650 pounds or so is pretty considerable for the 415 horsepower on tap, particularly given the fact that torque peaks up at 4500rpm. It’s more show than go. If you choose the Audi R8 V10 Plus model, you’ll get a dual-clutch transmission and nearly a Gallardo’s worth of power — but the R8 V10 Plus doesn’t feel as light on its feet or as enthusiastic around a racetrack as the Gallardo LP-560. And in so doing, you’ll lose the V8 model’s characterful noises and real-world focus.
The best R8 to get is a six-speed manual 4.2V8 post-2012 model. If you get one of those, you’ll have all of Tony Stark’s style and daily usability to rival a Lexus ES350. You’ll just have to put on your turn signal when a real supercar appears. The next four cars in this test are on another level of performance entirely.
Summary: One hell of a Grand Touring car.
You said it would be your choice to drive across country, how much luggage would actually fit?
Exactly why I rated it higher and I wouldn’t feel like I was trying to compensate for my manhood if I had a Lambo for example.
Not much and therein lies the problem. It’s OK to be a GT or everyday super car if you have enough luggage space to make good on that proposition.
And on public streets, no need to move over for the other super cars. At any speed that would require you to move over, both you and the other driver are going straight to jail.
These cars are being ranked by their prowess on the track
“You’ll just have to turn on your turn signal when a real super air appears”. Nice. For the record, I’ve never driven this car. To me it seems a compromise in a world of finely tuned performance. Maybe this is secretly what some drivers want, but in this segment, I want to see that engaged, tactile experience. So far, I voted correctly :)
I wonder how the R8 4.2 compares to a Carrera S in the battle of everyday-usable-yet track-ready sports cars.
If you dont need AWD I feel like the Carrera is the much better car
600 lbs is a LOT, and the PDK is magic.
The Carrera does come in the 4S (AWD) variant also. I own one. My car is about .5 sec faster in the 0-60, but that’s only one piece of the equation.
Considering these are all street cars, this one sounds like the best of the bunch. If you want a dedicated track tool, Radical and Caterham can set you up.
It’s really disappointing that America doesn’t build an updated McLaren. I’d gladly take that over just about everything Italian under $500,000.
McLaren is British, and they do build new cars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_650S
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_P1
Please excuse the 12 year old of his lack of knowledge.
The R8 I drove was also a 4.2 auto. One of the nicest cars I’ve ever been in, but I’d never mention it if someone asked me about the fastest or most impressive cars I’ve experienced. Keep in mind I don’t get to drive exotics or anything, I’ve just been in much faster Porsches, Corvettes, Mustangs etc…
Jack, would it still have finished in last place if it had been a six-speed? I assume so because you’re focused more on performance than on the R-tronic’s shortcomings, but I can’t believe they sold a single R-tronic. Single clutch automated manuals just don’t work well.
No surprise really. It was always softer than the Lambo cousins and it is an old design with old, underpowered engines in today’s age.
Many of the B&B predicted this car would win and here it appears in last place. Interest note about the staggered tire setup. After tracking my 350Z I quickly learned that one of the reasons it understeers. I assumed any front engine, rear drive car would immediately go sideways but the narrow front tires give up first at corner entry causing the car to “push”. Of course throttle application can correct this but it goes to show just why the OEMs put wide tires out back.
FYI per my wife this is car to have not because of Iron Man, but because of Fifty Shades. The R8 is the panty dropper.
Of the twelve guesses, it only had two podium finishes: a first and a third.
Never have been able to get over that weird body panel behind the door. Major fail.
Next.
That, my friend, is a blade, not a body panel.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/audi-r8-car3.htm
You say major fail while the consensus over on most reviews of the car are positive concerning the Blade.
I like the blade. Functional too.
“I was surprised at how often my single-serving students at the Xtreme Xperience mentioned Tony Stark and “Iron Man” as the reason they’d chosen to drive the R8. I never really thought of it as the “Iron Man” car. Apparently everybody else does.”
I’m going to err on the side that you haven’t seen the Iron Man movies. Audi is a sponsor. They had Robert Downey Jr. drive an R8 and Gwyneth Paltrow drive…an RS6?…can’t remember.
Ironically(?), as Aucra is the car sponsor for the Averngers movies they stuffed RDJ in an NSX concept…which they chopped the roof off of [Picard facepalm].
In Captain America – the Winter Soldier, Chevy seems to be the sponsor. I sure wouldn’t mind having that Tahoe that Nick Fury is being pursued by the bad guys in. lol
Also saw some Impalas and at least one Silverado.
“I was surprised at how often my single-serving students at the Xtreme Xperience mentioned Tony Stark and “Iron Man” as the reason they’d chosen to drive the R8. I never really thought of it as the “Iron Man” car. Apparently everybody else does.”
I’m going to err on the side assuming you haven’t seen the Iron Man movies. Audi is a sponsor. Robert Downey Jr. drove the R8 in them.
Ironically(?), Acura is the sponsor for the Avengers movies and they hastely stuffed RDJ in an NSX concept.
Is Honda/Acura ever going to release the NSX??? They’ve been teasing us with this car for YEARS! Frankly, I think its release will pale against the BMW i8.
I’d put money on Ford selling the GT before Acura does the NSX.
All good things come to those who are patient and in this case, rich.
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/12/17/acura-nsx-confirmed-detroit-auto-show/
I really do think the R8 is the best all-rounder, and is in the same vein as the original NSX. You could actually use it every day if you wanted, and it wasn’t filled with exotic unobtanium to break the bank later.
The R8 looks especially brilliant to me in white.