Vehicle names are often lies. Take LTD, for example. Demon? No proof of possession, at least none that can be recognized by the Catholic Church.
Ferrari, on the other hand, has introduced a new Geneva-bound model that aptly sums up its purpose through its name: Superfast. Yes, the Ferrarri 812 Superfast is, unsurprisingly, just that.
As a successor to the F12 Berlinetta, the 812 Superfast needs to do things in a gutsier manner than the model that came before. It’s also the 70th anniversary of the first Ferrari-badged car, so it only made sense for the prancing pony to make this model its fastest and most powerful production offering to date.
Avoiding any form of forced induction, the 812 Superfast’s 5.5-liter V12 makes 790 horsepower and 530 lb-ft of torque. Yes, it’s a screamer, making peak power at a lofty 8,500 rpm. Maximum torque arrives at 7,000 rpm, though a driver can still capture 80 percent of that figure at engine speeds half that.
What is all of this caged energy good for? According to Ferrari, zero to 62 miles per hour should fly by in 2.9 seconds, with a top speed of somewhere above 211 mph as a target should anyone want to pursue it.
Weight distribution on this front-engined ride, which weighs less than 2,400 pounds when dry, falls 53 percent to the rear, 47 percent up front. A seven-speed dual-clutch transmission sends power to the rear wheels. Electric power steering makes its brand debut, and Ferrari promises an updated version of Slide Slip Control to preserve the Superfast after the happy customer peels out of the lot.
Price? There is no price, at least not yet. Ferrari will have all the details on this ultra-lux performer at its official unveiling next month at the Geneva Motor Show.
As for the name, not only is is applicable — it’s also historical. The moniker originated on a version of the 410 Superamerica that appeared in 1956. Later, the 1964-1966 500 Superfast carried the name to prominence.
[Images: Ferrari]
“***Avoiding any form of forced induction***, the 812 Superfast’s 5.5-liter V12 makes 790 horsepower and 530 lb-ft of torque.”
I’ll be in my bunk…
Just face the wall!
It is his love, it is his passion. It is his fault he didn’t lock the garage.
2400 pounds…wow that’s impressive.
Lightness doesn’t come cheap.
Being reported elsewhere at about 3400 lbs.
That does sound lots more realistic. Heck, still impressive. And much more useable than the kind of all out race prototype engineering required to get it anywhere near 2400.
If expensive exotica was my thing, this is the one I’d keep an eye out for. FR V12s with rear biased weight distribution, are just awesome road cars.
Wait, what? 2400 pounds? I find that pretty much impossible to believe. The F12 is around 3350 pounds dry. I think 3400 pounds is probably what you meant.
Superfast?
Is that in reference to the sexual compensatory mechanism that is this car?
^^^
I wish I could remember the name of the advertising firm from the movie, “Crazy People.”
Has a wee resemblance of a certain sports car GM makes, although I have no doubt the 812 does everything substantially better.
Including the warm fuzzy feeling I have right now.
It’s almost as though Ferrari’s design teams were shown a photo of the horrible styling abomination that is the C7* and were told “fix this.”
And they did.
*Great car. Looks like crap, though.
Go back and compare a 1960 Ferrari 250 GTO and a 1960 Corvette, then decide which is the copy.
Well its better then the Ferrari called “The Ferrari”. All I can gather from these silly names is Ferrari spends more engineering things then naming them. And I am pretty much OK with that.
Steph, Steph, Steph. Seems like your typing got “superfast”. A little excited? :-)
Usually, IMHO, TTAC >> Autoblog, but in this case, Autoblog got the specs right, and you fat-fingered ’em..
6.5l, not 5.5l. 3400 (3360) lbs, not 2400.
That’s a pretty nice refresh of the C7.
Wait, what?
Also, Matchbox.
Certainly good to see Ferrari build one last super powerful naturally aspirated coupe. Although for some reason, these wheels are giving me last generation CR-V vibes and I don’t like that
These improvements get less and less impressive with each iteration. Seems like they are making these updates faster and faster too, versus taking a platform and pushing it to its limit (the way they did with the 599). I’m still getting over the F12.
Oh now I get it, Lamborghini owns the “Superveloce” name…
Ok, 12 is related to cylinder number, but what does 8 stand for?
The power output is 800 cv (cheval vapeur). 1 hp is 1.014277726508357 cv.
Thx
I dunno, it looks like it was sculpted by cold, expensive computers rather than warm human hands like the Ferraris of yore. (probably because it was).
Now that we’re well over 50 years into the era of the mid-engine supercar — I count from the 1966 Lamborghini Miura — I’m finding it hard to warm up to the proportions of these cab backward designs.
Ferrari, with its need to accommodate the length of a V12 engine, has a bit more excuse than Corvette with its short V8, but even so the front seems too long and the rear overhang oddly short.
Pretty sure I wouldn’t kick an 812 out of bed though…
Well, it’s necessary for weight distribution. Put the engine forward, but not too much :-)