Automotive News [sub] provides “tantalizing hints” (source?) about which six vehicles “could be” built in Chrysler factories and sold in Chrysler dealerships under their Italian brand names. At the U.S. taxpayer’s expense. [NB: Count the above Panda Jeep twice for two different engine permutations (1.2 and 1.4-liter) in the new Chrysler tradition.]
• Fiat 500 minicar: Big hit, retro hatch, possible Mini [ED: MINI] fighter
• Alfa Romeo MiTo: Stylish 3-door hatchback
• Alfa Romeo Milano: Compact sedan, will replace current Alfa 147
• Alfa Romeo Giulia: Sleek mid-size sedan, will replace current Alfa Romeo 159
• Alfa Romeo compact SUV: Compact utility vehicle hinges on Alfa Romeo’s re-entry into U.S.
Many of our Best and Brightest have flagged the fact that cold weather may ding the Chevrolet’s gas/electric Hail Mary Volt’s performance. And now we have anecdotal, real world evidence for the challenge. Underneath an innocuous headline, “Fusion Hybrid Game-Changer for Ford,” a WardsAuto scribe gives us the 411 on the difference between the vehicle’s heavily advertised EPA number (38.5 mpg combined) and its cold weather efficiency. Byron Pope reveals, “The best we can squeeze out of the Fusion Hybrid is a combined 33 mpg (7.1 L/100 km). In all fairness, our seat time came in the midst of a brutal Michigan winter cold snap. Running the heater at nearly full blast most of the time siphons power from the battery causing the car to rely more often on its gasoline engine.” And that’s because using the heater changes the way the Fusion hybrid’s power-train works . . .
We’ve been hearing a lot recently about GM bondholders’ unwillingness to take the haircut offered by The General—a precondition for federal loans. Ha! Got you! It was supposed to be a precondition. Uncle Sam blew through the first deadline as if that check box didn’t even exist. As the The Presidential Task Force on Automobiles (PTFOA) prepares to dish-up a second helping from the bailout buffet, GM bondholders are tooling-up for next week’s PR war. The “unofficial committee’s” letter to the PTFOA [full text via Reuters] kicks off with the Cerberus defense: ” . . . many of these bonds are owned by average citizens, who purchased them to support their own retirement and college expenses and other critical needs.” As we said when Chrysler’s owners assumed this position, bullshit. As the letter acknowledges, 80 percent of this debt is held by institutions. Meanwhile . . .
OK, we’re ready to start implementing our plan B for TTAC’s survival. I’ll be touching base with our Best and Brightest in the next couple of days to discuss a meta plan to generate income—for the site AND its writers—without walling off content. Meanwhile, here’s our first bit of real (i.e., non-CAFE Press) swag: a framed GM certificate. At $149.99 ($25 kickback for us), it’s not cheap. But I want to position TTAC swag at the top end of the market: quality, price no object. Our agreement with the certificate provider includes one line of text at the bottom (“cut-out in bottom mat, size 3/4″ × 5″ to 7″ for lettering insert”). So what message should we include? We could go Latin: veritas vos liberabit (the truth will set you free), veritatem dies aperit (time discloses the truth), vincit omnia veritas (the truth conquers all). Or perhaps an appropriate quote: “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (George Santayana); “History shows you don’t know what the future brings” (GM CEO Rick Wagoner); “Generally, cars were not built to sit on dealer lots. It encourages the wrong kind of behavior in the whole system” (also Wagoner). Ideas?
The Wall Street Journal reports that the concord between Italy’s Fiat and China’s Chery has fallen apart, a victim of the global auto industry meltdown. Chery spokesman Jin Yibo was not in a word-mincing mood. “The global situation is totally different from before. We have had to adjust our strategy accordingly . . . It definitely won’t happen this year.” Hey! Isn’t that the same Chery that had signed a highly-touted deal to produce a small car for Chrysler? (That was then going to be built by Nissan?) Yup. So, Chrysler can’t work with Chery to bring cars to the US. Fiat can’t work with Chery to build cars in China. But Chrysler can work with Fiat to build Fiats in the US. Makes sense. But then I’m pretending to be a Chrysler executive or a member of the Presidential Task Force on Autos (PTFOA). And while we’re on that subject, next week the PTFOA will begin floating trial balloons advertising the next seating at the multi-billion dollar bailout buffet. So a quick refresher on the bureaucrats that constitute the august body in whose hands Chrysler and GM’s fate rests. [NB: Steve Rattner joined Ron Bloom after the commission was formed.]
The sale of its automobiles on the prices of 2008 g., which will be prolonged from March 23 to April 30. Thus, [UAZ] attempts to get rid of the overstock of storages. The average sum of reduction is 25 thousand rubles. With its calculation the price on UAZ Of patriot with the gasoline engine in the assembly Of classic will be 440 thousand rubles, and ” [Patriot]” in the complete assembly with the Diesel engine Of iveco it will manage to buyer into 595 thousand rubles. The buyers of the automobile UAZ Of hunter with the gasoline engine can save 20 thousand rubles, and with the diesel – 24 thousand rubles. Let us recall, since February 16 plant works three days in the week, this graph will be preserved until August 1. If until this time situation with sales does not change to the best side, company will be is forced to begin the releases of personnel, since according to the Russian legislation the reduced operating mode can be introduced in enterprise maximum for six months. It previously communicated that in 2009. ” [UAZ]” it plans to let out 53 thousand [vsedorozhnikov], which to 26,7% is less than in the past year, when were assembled 72,3 thousand automobiles. P.S. [Interestno] will influence this the prices of Ukrainian dealers.
Today’s the day that the embargo on Camaro reviews ends. First, as a taxpayer, a big thank you to all the automotive publications and websites that abided by the terms of GM’s proscription. You’ve helped my corporate beneficiary concentrate its marketing firepower for maximum effect. Second, I want to re-iterate my suspicion—based on historical precedent—that all Camaros tested were “ringers” (specially built and prepared versions). And third, I’d like to point out that Detroit News carmudgeon Scott Burgess and I share something: we both hate people. OK, I hate the lies that people tell and Scott hates anyone who hates Detroit. I’ve said time and again that the number of people who actually care enough to hate Detroit is statistically irrelevant. But Scott’s world is constantly under imaginary assault from people who vilify the cars he loves. Which, needless to say, includes the new Camaro. Althoughly, strangely, Scott doesn’t bless with his 100 percent seal of approval. In fact, reading between the lines, the new Camaro’s not even a 90 percent car. First the ho-sannahs . . .
As today’s post on Barack Obama’s Model T vs. SUV comparison indicates, there’s a lot of auto-related misinformation swirling around the court of public opinion. Seeing as you are the autoblogosphere’s Best and Brightest, it’s time to bust some myths. (Or at least engage in some of the usual punch-ups.) What are the automotive myths that simply won’t die? Our Ronnie Schreiber correctly flagged ye olde 100 mpg carburetor, which pairs nicely with the “GM killed the electric car” conspiracy. On the other side of that equation, PCH101 routinely confronts the idea that Japan manipulated its currency to kick Motown’s ass. There’s also this idea out there, somewhere, that a Chinese automaker is just itching to invade the U.S. market and kick some D2.8/Toyondissan ass with ridiculously inexpensive products. My [least] favorite myth: GM is the blameless victim of a bad economy. What auto-related mishegos stick in your craw?
President Obama recently received major car guy demerits when he proclaimed that America invented the automobile. Even if you give Obama a mulligan, someone on his staff should have fact-checked the jingoistic assertion—especially after President Kennedy told Germany he was a jelly donut (ein Berliner). But President Obama’s most recent gaffe reveals darker demagoguery, highlighting his Messianic mission to mold motorcars to his green dreams. The AP reports,
Obama, touring a California electric car plant on Thursday, said, ‘The 1908 Model T — think about this — the 1908 Model T earned better gas mileage than the typical SUV in 2008… Think about that: 100 years later, and we’re getting worse gas mileage, not better, on SUVs.’
There’s a lot of talk about Cerberus’ favorite automotive and sub-prime housing lender—sorry “bank” relocating to Charlotte, North Carolina, where CEO Al de Molina hangs his hat and, presumably, shelters a chunk of his $11.6M annual compensation. Hey, see it from Big Al’s perspective: Congress’ desire to kill the corporate jet market in the name of populism means GMAC’s main man can’t commute to Motown in a Gulfstream anymore. Or see it from Charlotte’s perspective: they’re happy to lure the $6 billion federal bailout queen with a $4.49M grant. WHAT? Not even a “loan”? Wow. Desperate times, eh? Anyway, Detroit’s loss could be your gain. Here’s how [via WCNC.com]:
Friends — I’m sorry for the mass email — as some of you know, I recently joined Steve Rattner and Ron Bloom on the President’s Auto Task Force. While the work before us constitutes an extraordinary challenge, Eva and I are excited to be able to give back in this way at this time.
I’m writing because our primary challenge right now is that the work is complicated and massive, and our team is quite small. We are looking to add people with the following sets of experience:
Although it’s not exactly the riddle of the Sphinx (answer: man), many of our Best and Brightest have wondered why GM can’t make a decent car interior. Even before GM Car Czar Bob Lutz assumed the throne (since abdicated), the American automaker has admitted that they need to step up their game within its vehicles. And yet, in the main, the fit and finish of GM interiors still doesn’t make the grade. Obviously, there’s a whole host of contributing factors—from supplier contracts to union work rules. A GM insider recently contacted TTAC to provide an important piece of that particular puzzle. Agent X reveals one of the main reasons GM’s interiors failed to match the competition: the executives didn’t know there was a problem. Still don’t. Here’s why . . .
I think it’s important to realize that the Detroit bailout is no longer an ideological battle. At the beginning of this $40 b-b-b-billion boondoggle (and counting), Motown-fed politicians defended the bailout by screaming “jobs! jobs! jobs!” even though the automakers themselves were screaming no such thing (aware as they no doubt were that those jobs! jobs! jobs! were doomed! doomed! doomed!). Now, you hear very little regarding “saving the middle class.” In fact, the rhetoric claiming we need to shell out for the domestics because “we must protect America’s industrial base” has also gone away. Now, Detroit’s new New Deal rests on a green platform (i.e., EVs), and depends entirely on “viability.” In other words, getting our freaking money back. Only not.
Recent Comments