TTAC has been working with our Best and Brightest to uncover the hidden investors behind Chrysler. We’ve made some headway. First, the name of Cerberus’ Chrysler funds: Cerberus CG Investor I LLC, Cerberus CG Investor II LLC, Cerberus CG Investor III LLC. The information came from Daimler [click here then search for “CG Investor”; it’s under structure of the transaction]. Searching for hits on the CG funds, we’ve unearthed Franklin Templeton Investments’ Mutual Recovery Fund. Here’s the money shot: the fund’s 2008 Annual Report. Scroll down to page 5 (their numbering), second footnote. And there it is. And now we can drill down to some interesting info…

Read More >

A TTAC Tipster writes:

According to one of my GM buddies, the May 1 pay cut is as follows: 10% for unclassified (executives); 7% for Levels 8 and 9 (managers, technical fellows, other senior folks); 3% for Level 7 and below. Levels 8 and 9 and unclassified enjoy the use of company vehicles. Last year, a lot of the Level 8s were forced to take demotions to Level 7: no pay cut, but they had to give up their company car, although they got some financial help in getting a new GM car.

All pay cuts are “temporary” and will be under reconsideration in December.

Read More >

When it comes to “why can’t U.S. car companies kill their dead brands?” TTAC has always pointed the finger straight at America’s 50-state patchwork of franchise laws. If GM killed, I dunno, Saab, every Saab dealer in these here United States would drag The General’s ass down to the local courthouse demanding—and receiving—reparations. Lest we forget, Oldsmobile’s termination cost GM a billion dollars back when a billion dollars was a lot of money. If, however, Chrysler, GM or Ford filed for Chapter 11, they could kill brands and dealers at will—without paying ex-dealers anything more than the cost of their inventory. And maybe not even that. Franchised dealers can see the writing on the wall, and they’re not happy. So they’re proactively legislating a new post-C11 deal for themselves—inflating the claims against the automakers’ assets, increasing the likelihood that the D2.8’s bondholders will file for same.

Read More >

Fourteen percent of GM’s global salaried workforce will lose their jobs by the end of the year, reports Automotive News [sub] as the General flails to slash costs. GM’s salaried ranks will drop from 73k to 63k by the time the current cuts are completed. 3,400 of GM’s 29,500 US salaried employees will lose their jobs by May 1, and remaining workers will see their pay cut by between three and ten percent. These cuts will bring GM’s salaried workforce to a lower level than the 65k-67k called for in their initial December 2 viability plan. DId we mention that these fine folks will be losing their jobs without any buyout offers, just as GM slashes its severance pay? Sometimes it doesn’t pay to be a salaryman.

Read More >

The New York Post reports that Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli “transferred a $3.8 million, four-bedroom, five-bath Los Angeles spread to his wife, Susan, on Jan. 17, 2008, according to deed records filed in Los Angeles County and recorded with the Assessor’s Office on Feb. 5, 2008.” There are only three possible reasons for this move: divorce, estate planning or a hedge (there’s that word again) against future legal action, when creditors come to call. Strangely, or not so strangely, Bob’s personal spinmeister is denying the facts of the matter. “A spokeswoman for Nardelli early today insisted the records were incorrect and no transfer took place.” The story gets curiouser and
curiouser . . . .

Read More >

The General Motors spin-off of Delphi which never really was, isn’t. Today’s Wall Street Journal [sub] has another “people involved in the negotiations”-sourced story claiming that these latest moves are all “part of a strategy to qualify for additional government loans”. Delphi has never really been an independent company from the start. The obvious reason of course is that GM provides the vast majority of Delphi’s business. But more than that, GM is on the hook for Delphi’s pension costs, has paid the price for voluntary separations at Delphi and has repeatedly been the source of bailout bucks for Delphi. Considering that “since 2005, GM has poured in $11.7 billion to help sustain the company,” they might as well just call it the Delphi Division. But how do federal bailout dollars get wrapped up in this mess?

Read More >

GM Car Czar Bob Lutz is calling it quits at the end of the year. Or, as they like to say in the “here’s your golden parachute; see you in Aruba” RenCen echelons, Maximum Bob “will transition to a new role effective April 1, 2009, as Vice Chairman and Senior Advisor.” In other words, we still have MB to kick around until the end of the year or the end of GM, whichever comes first. GM CEO Rick Wagoner was effusive about Lutz’ contribution to the total destruction of GM’s brands—in his own entirely reserved way. “Bob Lutz was already a legendary automotive product guy when he rejoined GM in 2001,” Wagoner’s statement says. “He’s added to that by leading the creation of a string of award-winning vehicles for GM during his time here. His 46 years of experience in the global automotive business have been invaluable to us.” Love that “car guy” stuff. Now, for some more accountant-friendly info . . .

Read More >

Last Thanksgiving, I took my step-daughter to the GM “Test Track” at Disney World. When we walked up to the heavy steel door, the ride was “temporarily closed” for “technical reasons.” We waited. The ride reopened twenty minutes later. We were cattle herded through a chain link channel, passing various displays designed to educate guests about automotive development: air bags, door longevity, etc. The ten-year-old displays were worn, dated and dusty. There was no branding anywhere; no mention of Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac, GMC, Saturn, Saab, Cadillac or HUMMER. When we got to the acoustic chamber, the ride broke. Not good: the chamber lacked ventilation. People started leaving the line after 20 minutes. Just before the ride, a short video (on a small TV) extolled the joys of ABS—for a Chevy Trailblazer.

Read More >

As regular readers know, The Truth About Cars is working hard to try to find out who owns Chrysler—now that [ex] President Bush has provided $3b worth of no to low-interest loans to the technically bankrupt automaker. And now that this selfsame beneficiary of our government’s largess is looking for another $4b loan. And the rest. In our pursuit of this information, we are aided by members of our Best and Brightest who also believe that we should know exactly whom we are subsidizing. Are they the “retirees, teachers, municipal workers and ordinary citizens” that Cerberus claims? Or are the 100 or so unnamed investors members of hedge funds, perhaps from abroad?

Read More >

G’day! The Sydney Morning Herald is first up with news that Ford will have to stump-up $4b for a 2008 pension shortfall. “The collapsing stock market left the fund with a $4.1 billion deficit for its projected obligations, after 2007’s $3 billion surplus, Ford said in its fourth-quarter financial results. That may force an infusion of money starting next year, according to the viability plan filed with Congress in December.”

Read More >

If you’re familiar with Delphi—a former GM division with the words “bankrupt since October 10, 2005” over the door—then you’ll know that they’re a not-so-hidden cancer on GM cancerous corpse. Even as The General seeks to survive with a federal IV stuck in its metaphorical artery, it continues to peel off just enough cash—now your cash—to keep the parts maker making parts. For vehicles no one’s buying; but that’s how the industry doesn’t roll these days. So, some bad news from the oracle then. First, GM’s told their pals at the SEC (accounting scandal forgotten) that they’re accelerating a $50m payment to Delphi. [NB: Delphi had asked GM for a $100m hurry-up.] Can you say running on fumes? Delphi can. “The Company believes the amendment and accelerated GM support will enable it to preserve available liquidity given the difficult economic environment, particularly in the global automotive industry,” Delphi said in a filing with their pals over at the federal bankruptcy court. Judge Robert Drain, no less. And the cutbacks keep on happening!

Read More >

Not buyers of Dodge Vipers per se. Some 127 of them found their way to a Dodge dealer in January, a 74 percent gain from last year’s total. Of course, that may have a little something to do with the fact that A) Dodge dealers are dealing as if their life depends on it (which it does) and B) the chances of buying a new Viper are decreasing by the minute. Especially since Chrysler revealed that it wants to sell the model as a brand to . . . someone. Oh how we laughed! Well, not Autoblog obviously, despite having reported that American tuner Saleen was a suitor (after having reported that Saleen’s busy going belly-up). I mention this not because I’ve been dying to put the boot in to Autoblog ever since my reader-inspired vow of fraternity, but because it raises the obvious question. Is Chrysler lying when it told the MSM that it has three companies interested in buying its Viper tooling and trademarks? (Setting aside the question of whether or not Cerberus has already mortgaged these “assets.”) Here’s AB’s take:

Read More >

Think about it. That’s AFTER the U.S. Treasury Department “invested” $6b of your hard-earned tax dollars into the failing auto and mortgage finance company. “Auto sales are in freefall,” Fifth Third Asset’s Mirko Mikelic told Bloomberg. The Michigan money manager (whose company holds a big chunk of GMAC debt) says the bailout “may keep them around at least until they need to restructure.” Confused. May . . . at least . . . until? Bottom line: GMAC’s Q4 new vehicle financing fell from last year’s $13.4b to ’08’s $2.7b. Despite Uncle Sam’s cash infusion and fire sale pricing and lowered FICO score loan eligibility, what’s the bet that the needle doesn’t budge on that number? Meanwhile, Rescap, GMAC’s mortgage unit, famous for its easy credit home loans, is also dying a death. On this subject, Mr. Mikelic leaves the sugar coating on the shelf. “Their mortgage business is basically closed.” With house sales going nowhere slowly, GMAC has a new strategy, related to their free pass bank status.

Read More >

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. WAS is being filed from Tokyo this week.

Here they come: China’s SAIC will sell its homegrown cars to Spain, UK, and Israel beginning in 2010, Gasgoo reports. Some of the cars will come directly from SAIC’s assembly plants in Shanghai and Nanjing, while others will come from the company’s UK assembly plants, which SAIC acquired from Rover. The UK will get domesticated Chinese. All cars will comply with EU Euro-5 emission standards.

Germany down 14 percent in January: Not quite 19 percent as feared yesterday, but close. Germany sold 14 percent fewer cars in January 2009 than in January 2007, Automobilwoche [sub] reports. If you are looking for a statistical savior: Adjusted for buying days, the drop is only 8 percent. All eyes on the clunker culling money, €2.5K. It was introduced 1/27, too late to save the first week of the year.

Sania rejects Porsche, Porsche happy: Much to the relief of Porsche, Sweden’s truckmaker, Scania, rejected a bid Porsche had to make after taking over VW, the Wall Street Journal [sub] writes.

Read More >

The Freep reports on the analysis of JP Morgan’s Eric Selle and Atiba Edwards, who argue that GM bondholders could emerge from negotiations with a 20 percent stake in the world’s second-largest automaker. GM must outline a strategy to eliminate two-thirds of its $35b in unsecured debt by February 17. “We expect a bond exchange will settle around 35% of par with an equity component representing 20% of GM’s equity,” write Selle and Edwards. But the JP Morgan analysts warn that the “threat of bankruptcy will have to return in order for GM to achieve the required restructuring goals.” What, again?

Read More >