Commentator David Dennis asks…

I hope I’m not changing the subject too much, but there’s one thing that’s really bugged me about TTAC: your dislike of “Maximum Bob” Lutz. I may have read too many buff books, but I’ve always instinctively liked the guy.

I can’t help but notice that Chrysler had a pretty good car lineup when Bob jumped ship for GM. Once Bob was gone, their new car lineup disintegrated into the awfulness that has them in their current pathetic condition.

And likewise, once Bob started at GM, GM cars started getting a lot better, to the point where TTAC and other reviewers noticed.

Is Bob Lutz a great man or an out of touch domestic automaker drone? It seems to me that he’s pretty good at product development, or at least at convincing companies to approve better and more adventurous ideas already percolating.

I know he makes some outrageous comments but sometimes there’s a lot of truth to them, too.

Thoughts?

D

To once again paraphrase an old Soviet joke, there are two ways Detroit can be turned around: the natural and the miraculous. The natural way is that the Archangel Michael and his bands of angels descend to earth and work 24 hours a day to save the city’s economy. The miraculous way is that the automakers do it themselves.

In the WTF dept., “Hyundai Motor India is planning to shift production of one of its premium models to Europe after a strike over unionization at its south India plant that led to the mass arrest of 750 protesters,” reports Financial Times.

The move reflects growing skepticism of international automakers about the political climate in what used to be one of the world’s most promising growth markets.

Read More >

The Motor Authority reveals that Cadillac has spiked the STS-V model for 2010. The high-performance variant of the brand’s slow-selling flagship (who knew?) joins the Impala SS, Cobalt SS and Pontiac G6 GXP in model heaven (purgatory?). The SS moniker will live in in the hearts and minds of students of Jewish persecution and fans of the new Chevrolet Camaro. As widely reported elsewhere, GM CEO Fritz Wagoner Clone Henderson specifically highlighted the fact that GM was NOT going to drop the Corvette from its shrinking roster of performance-oriented brands—I mean, products. This despite slow sales, a ruling Presidential Task Force on Autos that keeps mentioning the words “small” and “fuel efficient” (yes, I know), and the fact that the in-house fanzine “Corvette Quarterly” has published its last paean to pistonhead perfection, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.

Recent reports that GM won’t even let the fanboys drive their Volt mules in the all-important range-extending “generator mode” were troubling enough, but recent chatter from inside GM suggests that maybe Chevy should have simply designed the Volt as an electric-only vehicle. “It’s best utilized in urban vehicles,” GM Product chief Tom Stephens explains to Automotive News [sub]. “We have to consider what is the usage of the person buying the vehicle. For a commuter who drives 40 miles a day and takes it shopping on weekend, it’s the perfect application.” Yes, and a Hummer is the perfect vehicle for those who want to practice counterinsurgency tactics on the weekends, but the market doesn’t necessarily reflect that, does it? No, it’s image über alles at GM. Is it any surprise then to learn (via GM-volt.com) that the Volt was originally imagined by Bob Lutz as an EV-only city car?

Read More >

China’s new car sales come roaring back. After a strong first quarter, China’s passenger car sales, including minivans, rocketed up a whopping 44.5 percent in April from a year earlier. Shen me? (Excuse me?)

Read More >

Detroit apologists—who sincerely believe that GM was headed for turnaround town when gas prices ascended and the worldwide economic tsunami hit—will take pleasure in the fact that Toyota reckons it’ll spill $8.6 billion worth of red ink on the corporate carpet. No doubt, the Japanese automaker is “struggling” to cope with the loss of one million units from their worldwide balance sheet. During the January to March Japanese fourth quarter, the formerly unassailable automaker got assailed but good, losing $6.9 billion. As we’ve reported previously, the US and Japanese markets are ToMoCo’s big hole, switching from huge profits to equally enormous losses without much of anything in between. As Automotive News [sub] reports, the head of the ailing automaker had  a completely different response to the news of his employer’s sinking fortunes than, say, anyone who works for GM. [GM cheat sheet: the secret word is “accountability”.] “Of course the external environment doesn’t help,” Toyota president Katsuaki Watanabe told reporters. “But we were lacking in the scope and speed of dealing with various problems and issues, and for that I am sorry.” So . . . now what?

Read More >

Nante hazukashi! (How embarrassing!) Japanese car manufacturers show very bad manners and use red ink in their books.

Fuji Heavy, makers of Subaru, posted its first net loss in 15 years in the fiscal year ended March, the Nikkei [sub] says. Resposible? The usual suspects: Sluggish consumption, tighter conditions, a drop in vehicle sales in all major markets, and the yen’s rise.

Fuji Heavy posted a net loss of ¥69.93 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, sharply down from a net profit of ¥18.48 billion a year earlier. Says the Nikkei: “For this fiscal year, Fuji Heavy, in which Toyota Motor Corp. owns a 16 percent stake, projects a net loss of ¥55 billion, operating loss of ¥35 billion and sales of ¥1.320 trillion, with auto demand likely to remain stagnant and the yen strong.”

So the United States finally gets the Nissan Cube, a funky, cool box. From initial impressions, it provides a unique and entertaining driving experience. Meanwhile, here in Western Europe, we get the Nissan Note, a Micra front-ended, Renault Modus-derived piece of crap. To say that I longed for a basic Ford Focus after driving this from Trier all the way to Maastricht, down to Luxembourg, and then back to Trier says a lot. The Note made me angry, so angry in fact that I actually contemplated sabotaging the thing so Sixt Car Rental would replace it. But then I realized they’d probably hand me the keys to yet another sour Note.

Read More >

Didn’t this just happen a short year ago? Or was it all a dream?

Most folks don’t know a Pontiac Torrent from a Joe Torre. Those of you immersed in the labyrinth of automobilia know that the former is a glorified shitbox. But everybody else? Not so much. By the same token, there are some excellent cars that don’t appear on the new car buyer’s radar. Terrific vehicles that get lost in the shuffle of pointless new names and missing marketing campaigns. As Buickman will tell you (and tell you and tell you), there are an awful lot of excellent cars that don’t get the attention they deserve and therefore don’t sell. And when they do sell, they depreciate alarmingly. Even when the chips are down, or especially when the chips are down, used car buyers are far more conservative than their new car counterparts. Unfamiliarity breeds contempt.

Read More >

Tom Blumer, in the WSJ, says, “Non-TARP Lenders Aren’t Making Up the Stories of White House Pressure,” citing conversations with anonymous Non-TARPies. According to these former holdouts, still masked and anonymous due to fear of reprisal, government officials went to the mats to pressure bondholders into compliance. Seeing as the group has dwindled from twenty to five since Obama called the group “hedge fund holdouts,” these tactics seem to have been highly effective. GM bondholders, pay attention (if you aren’t already).

Read More >

The Wall Street Journal has got its mitts on a document detailing Fiat’s plans for world automotive domination and can reveal that the name for Sergio Marchionne’s plan is “Project Phoenix.” The plan reportedly calls for Fiat to take over Opel, Vauxhall, Saab and GM’s South African operations in addition to the Chrysler brands. Fiat would spin off this new auto empire into a new entity which would also include the Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Lancia brands, but not Ferrari and Maserati. Fiat would also close GM Europe’s plant in Luton, UK, and cease operations in Graz, Austria. The payoff? Annual savings of around €1.4 billion from 2015 onwards, according to Fiat’s estimates. The downside? A high chance of epic failure.

As Top Gear puts it, “the HS250h is a rebodied, higher-performance Prius. It’s made for the US market, and was introduced at the Detroit show in January. It is hideous in profile . . . luckily, we won’t be getting it.” They say “luckily” because their version will be an Audi A3/BMW 1 series-fighting compact hatchback. But why make two? In fact why is Lexus competing for the European market at all? Lexus Europe boss Andy Pfeiffenberger offers a confused roadmap. “Our hybrid saloons are going up against the V8 diesels in Europe. In future we need to compete against the four-cylinder diesels. So we will enter new sectors with low-displacement hybrids. The C-premium segment is the fastest growing segment and we must be in it.” Huh?